Maurice Purify - Should He Stay or Should He Go?
Maurice Purify is set to settle his court issues tomorrow. He has two major incidents and he's going to settle all charges tomorrow in a plea arrangement after which Bill Callahan gets his turn to settle his issues with Purify.
So... here's the quandary. Do you:
- Kick Maurice Purify off the team for screwing up twice in five weeks. There is no place at Nebraska for him.
- Suspend him two games (Nevada and Wake Forest) and bring him back for the USC game.
The first is the easiest. Dismiss the kid, be rid of him and never let him wear Husker Red again. It's easiest for alumni like me. We can then take the moral high ground and look down upon other programs who don't dismiss troubled athletes but instead punish them by having them clean up the stadium after home games.
Unfortunately, I don't think it does much to further the growth of a young man and that's ultimately what's at stake here - what kind of young men are we building at Nebraska? Someone who accepts responsibility, recognizes what they've done wrong, and goes forward being a better person, or do we just want to get rid of them and save ourselves more potential embarrassment.
The second is more difficult. The coach immediately gets blamed for having a 'win at all costs' attitude. Alumni and fans get crap from co-workers, non-Husker relatives (that's what you get for marrying outside the Nation), or people you don't know sending you emails. And God help everyone if the kid screws up again. Then it's "You're an Idiot" time all over again, but squared.
Without knowing the outcome of the charges (although I'll guess he pleads "No contest"), I say suspend him a couple games and then bring him back for USC. Suspending him a couple games accomplishes a few things. It guarantees that he won't make any All-American, Big 12 conference, or post-season awards, so it serves as a punishment for screwing up. And it allows for enough time to pass to see if he's going to come around and get his head straight. If he does, he can play. If he doesn't, he's gone with no reservations.
After all these years and knowing what we know about Lawrence Phillips, I'm still convinced that Tom Osborne made the right decision in suspending Phillips and letting him later join the team. Osborne took the chance that Phillips would get through counseling and became a better human being. We all know that it didn't work out that way, but that isn't because the head coach didn't try to help him or give him another chance. It was because Phillips continued to make very bad choices throughout the rest of his life.
So, what to do? Is it better to give Maurice Purify another chance? Or dismiss him from the team?
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think an appropriate punishment...
...would require that he remain suspended for the USC game. But I am somewhat biased.
It's not like he shot anyone, after all. (Is that setting the bar too low?)
Why the two extremes?
I don't know if I call a 2 game suspension sufficient, and I think dismissal is a little harsh. Where's the middle ground?
Simple...Suspend Purify for the entire 2007 season. Purify has a redshirt year. Send everyone a message that this is not acceptable with a strong punishment, but one that keeps him in the program and gives him a chance to redeem himself. The NFL doesn't want guys who repeatedly screw up, so it's really in Purify's best interest to make him sit out 2007 and earn his way back on the team.
three games
I'm gonna suggest three games and a zero-tolerance policy going forward. Make Mo miss the one guaranteed opportunity he'll have to showcase his talent on a national stage (i.e. the USC game), but don't cut him off from the stabilizing influence of the team and coaching staff. If I were BC, I'd also make it clear that Mo had best not mess up again, at risk of losing his position on the team.
Some of the things other programs are having to deal with this off-season kind of put Mo's malfeasance in perspective. Seems to me he doesn't deserve a season suspension, but he can't be let off either. Suspending him through the USC game seems a severe enough punishment and should put to rest any accusations of favoritism by BC & Co.
But that's just my take.
as expected
Purify pleads "no contest" to all charges, gets a probation and a fine.
Part of the ruling is that he cannot consume any alchohol. As a college student, maybe they should tell him he can't breathe too hard either.
I'd guess I was about right on the outcome. Two game suspension, zero tolerance, back for the USC game.
fine
Well, BC hasn't indicated yet what Mo's punishment will be. I still think three games is more appropriate, but it's clear he'll be back with the team at some point this season.
What I'm wondering is how a student-athlete like Mo is supposed to pay a $1250 fine. His gameday per diem won't cover that. And as a D-1 football player, he's not allowed to work during the school year. Where do these players who get in trouble make the money to pay these fines?

by 





















