Since you obviously believe that OSU has no business playing in the title game yet Va Tech does, and you primarily base your argument on strength of schedule, I thought it would be appropriate to compare the resumes of the two teams.

OSU
Quality wins (those against teams with 8+ wins):
at Penn State (8-4), at Michigan (8-4), vs. Wisconsin (9-3)
Loss(es):
vs. Illinois (9-3)
non-conference schedule:
Akron (4-8), Kent St. (3-9), Washington (4-9), YSU (1-AA)

Va Tech
Quality wins:
at Virginia (9-3), at Clemson (9-3), vs. BC (10-2)
Loss(es):
vs. BC, at LSU (48-7)
non-conference schedule:
LSU (11-2), Ohio (6-6), E. Carolina (7-5), William & Mary (1-AA)

These schedules actually look pretty similar when placed side-by-side.  Three quality wins each, and I would argue that PSU, Michigan, and Wisconsin are better than Virginia, Clemson, and BC.  No bad losses on either side, as LSU and Illinois are BCS teams, whereas BC was 10-2; however, it is worth noting that Va Tech couldn't even stay on the field with LSU, losing by over 40 points.  Va Tech played a tougher out of conference schedule, but when you throw out the LSU game in which Va Tech was handed its shirts and thus should not be given much credit, the non-conference schedules are not extremely different (note, in particular, that you rip OSU for playing 1-AA YSU, but you're seemingly ok with Va Tech playing 1-AA William & Mary).

In short, your post in which you rip OSU seems to be driven more by some anti-OSU or anti-Big Ten animosity (indeed, you claim that the Big Ten is the worst of the BCS conferences, and while I agree it is a down year by Big Ten standards, it is still better, top to bottom, than the Big East or the ACC).  

Finally, I'll note that Va Tech getting into the BCS title game wouldn't exactly be fair to the fans or to LSU.  Indeed, LSU already clearly proved that they're better than Va Tech, beating them by 41 points.  Why should they have to waste everyone's time by again dismantling Va Tech?

There are other conference rankings out there besides Sagarin's that have the Big Ten ahead of the ACC (e.g., Marsee's).  So I think it's hardly a given that the Big Ten is the worst conference, contrary to what you may believe.

You cannot support your Va Tech non-conference argument by solely looking to the opponents' win-loss record.  Doing so entirely ignores the fact that OSU was 4-0 against non-conference foes, while Va Tech was 3-1.  By your logic, if OSU had played two teams with great records, say Hawaii and Kansas in the non-conference and had lost to them both, OSU would deserve to go to the NC game over Va Tech simply b/c they played better non-conference opponents, notwithstanding the fact that OSU would've then gone 2-2 in such games whereas Va Tech went 3-1.  Your reference to non-conference opponents' winning percentage would be a lot more convincing if OSU and Va Tech had the same record against non-conference opponents.  Unfortunately, they do not.

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on the Big Ten best vs. Clemson and Virginia argument.  Clemson has beaten absolutely no one of significance this year (check their schedule), and Virginia lost to NC State and Wyoming.  Wisconsin would beat both teams by several touchdowns, and I'd take PSU and Michigan (and maybe even Michigan State) to beat them both as well.

Look, if you want to say that OSU doesn't deserve to play in the NC game because they lost in November, I'll totally agree with you.  However, every team has a flaw this year.  LSU also lost in November, and they did so to an unranked team (not to mention losing to another unranked team earlier in the season).  It seems that you've bought into the popular yet lazy-thinker's argument that the Big Ten is weak and so OSU shouldn't make it to the title game.  However, taking the time to actually compare their schedule to the other candidates shows that such popular thinking doesn't withstand scrutiny.

Just a question and a few observations, to which I'll hope you respond, and then I'll let it go (although I do enjoy debating college football with fans of teams from other conferences).

1. Assume WVU beat Pitt this past weekend.  Would you have had as much of a problem with WVU in the NC game that you apparently have with OSU being there?  I'm just wondering, because I haven't seen nearly the backlash in your rankings against WVU that you have against OSU, even though WVU's strength of schedule is ranked 47th whereas OSU's is ranked 48th.

2. You claim that you'd have no problem with Oklahoma in the NC game.  Yet its strength of schedule is 39th.  Again, OSU's is 48th, so Oklahoma's is better, but it's not so much better so as to justify your outrage directed at OSU and the supposed weak Big Ten while simultaneously claiming that OU deserves a spot in the title game.  

3. I don't remember whether I saw it here, but there are a lot of people claiming that USC deserved a title shot, and their strength of schedule is 80th.  

In short, I think it's kind of funny that so many people are ripping OSU for having a supposedly weak schedule when theirs is head and shoulders above that of USC, practically the same as WVU's (about whose schedule I have heard no complaints), and in the same ballpark as Oklahoma's.