Nebraska vs. Wisconsin: About the Running Backs
Quarterbacks always get the brightest spotlight. It's true again this week as much of the talk around the Nebraska - Wisconsin game has been centered on Taylor Martinez and Russell Wilson. It's not surprising, given that Wilson has been responsible for 1,244 of Wisconsin's 2,129 yards while Martinez has racked up 1,068 of 1,756 yards for Nebraska.
But let's forget the quarterbacks for a moment.
Wisconsin and Nebraska share an identity as being rush-first teams. That won't change this weekend, as both teams will no doubt try to establish the run and control the line of scrimmage. That's where the running backs are crucial. While Nebraska has a lot of potential, Wisconsin has some proven talent.
Husker fans are plenty familiar with Rex Burkhead (formerly "Superman", now known as "Sexy Rexy" here at Corn Nation). Burkhead is coming off his best performance this season, amassing 170 yards against Wyoming on only 15 carries for a 11.3 yard average and two touchdowns. So far this season Burkhead has had 63 carries for 423 yards, seven touchdowns, and an average of 6.7 yards per carry. That's not bad considering Burkhead has faced his share of defenses stacked against the run.
Other than that, Nebraska's three freshmen running backs; Aaron Green, Braylon Heard, and Ameer Abdullah, have carried the ball a total of 37 times for 190 yards. Like I said, a lot of potential.
Before I get into the specifics about the Badger running backs, consider this tidbit, taken directly from Wisconsin's game notes for media:
Wisconsin is one of eight teams in the country to have not lost a fumble this sea- son. The last time a UW running back fumbled was James White against San Jose State in the second game of last season. Since then, Badger running backs have carried the ball 607 times, caught 51 passes and returned 28 kickoffs (686 total touches) without putting the ball on the turf (not just fumbles LOST, they have not fumbled at all).
Egad.
Wisconsin has two primary running backs, junior Montee Ball and sophomore James White. Wisconsin is the only school in the nation to return a pair of running backs that gained at least 900 yards last season - Ball finishing 2010 at 996 yards, while White gained 1,052.
While they're listed side-by-side on the depth chart, Ball can be considered the starter. Ball lost weight since last season, down to 210 from 236, and it doesn't appear to have affected his ability to hit the line and break tackles. He's a more complete back than White, but that may be due to having more experience as much as anything else. Ball has great vision, and with the loss of weight, has more speed than last season.
White should be considered more of a speed back, the type you want to get to the edge (as if you won't be hearing that cliché 23 million times this season). He was the 2010 Big Ten Freshman of the Year. Last season Wisconsin used misdirection plays to get White into position where he had to beat only one or two tacklers to break away on long gains. Where Ball might use power to beat defenders, White has some shifty moves going for him - a stutter step and burst and he's left the defender grabbing at air.
Both backs are seeing more passes thrown their way as Wisconsin has moved away (at least for this season while Wilson is around) from a tendency to force a rushing game to being content to throw the ball to soften up opposing defenses.
Husker fans might take some heart in Oregon State's performance against the Wisconsin rushing attack earlier this season. In the first quarter against the Beavers, the Badgers managed only three yards on the ground, largely accomplished because Oregon State's defense sold out against the run. Unfortunately (just when you were feeling better...), Wisconsin simply adjusted to pass more, something last year's Badger team may not have done. They would have chosen to keep smashing the ball at the defense and hope to catch them off-guard with play action. (It should be noted that Wisconsin finished the game with 208 yards rushing and two touchdowns as Oregon State wore down as the game went on.)
The obvious question is - how is Nebraska going to defend against the Wisconsin ground game?
In a word, discipline. Nebraska's defensive line will play gap defense, meaning they'll fill the gaps and not allow holes for the running backs to run through. That will be a tough challenge against a hefty Badger offensive line, the third heaviest in the country and larger than all but three NFL defensive lines. Blackshirt linebackers will need discipline to not get sucked inside so that a player like White doesn't get outside on misdirection plays.
Key to watch - does Bo Pelini go with a traditional 4-3 against Wisconsin, hoping three linebackers will stymy the Badgers running game?
I'm guessing he doesn't, but goes back to the 4-2-5 "peso" type formation he used so often last year against Big 12 offenses. More speed to match more speed.
That's the difference Russell Wilson has brought to Wisconsin.
Didn't I say to forget the quarterbacks for a bit?
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
There's Gotta be More
I have to believe there is more to our defense than we have seen so far this season. Maybe that is the optimistic Husker fan in me to think that. Having all our players healthy finally and with as big of a game as this is, there has to be more right?
I Bleed Husker Red!!!
Yeah, The Pelinis Are Going To Break Out the Awesome Sauce
They have stashed away and spread it all over the team boo-boos. Sarcasm aside, I hear you; this is NOT the defense we expected or have come to expect under the Pelini’s.
"Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?"
by UltimaRatioRegum on Sep 28, 2011 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Should be an interesting game
However, I do expect NU’s secondary to get burned multiple times, those times being a deciding factor in the game.
Nebraska just hasn’t evolved quite as far as Wisconsin has – I expect next year to be far different, however. Let’s just hope for a good game this time around.
Agree
I don’t think our offense or defense are experienced and/or disciplined enough to go on the road and beat a very well disciplined team in a hostile environment. I’d be surprised to see a win this week to say the least.
Look me up on youtube sometime...if you're really bored.
You
Don’t think….. Leave it at that. Maybe you are just trying to be objective(realistic), but I really don’t get you fans that have no faith in our program. Run down our team if it makes you feel better, but if the Huskers win this one, you have no right to celebrate with those of us with “wear rose colored glasses”.
by SONOFLY on Sep 29, 2011 1:45 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Yeah, I don't get this.
So if you don’t think your team is going to win, you’re not allowed to celebrate if they do? I’m not crazy about being told how to feel, and I’m guessing Billgrip isn’t, either.
by Cheeseandcorn on Sep 29, 2011 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Apparently you're only a fan if you believe we're the 1995 Cornhuskers every week.
"I did dumb things." - Tim Beck, Nebraska's new OC
by Salt Creek and Stadium on Sep 29, 2011 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Awwwwww :(
I’m sorry I told you how to “feel”, but all the negativity after going 4-0, scoring 43 points per game while watching our offense mature just baffles my mind. Our D is now suspect? Because we haven’t goose egged anyone yet? All this fear from our fan base ,It’s kind of embarrassing. Could we lose this game? Sure, but it’s way too close to call, so why not support a victorious prognostication instead of draping all over the team you claim to root for.
by SONOFLY on Sep 29, 2011 10:07 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I just saw the word 'speed' in combination with Wisconsin.
I had to double check that. Let’s be clear that its White, Toon and maybe Ball that have the speed for the Badgers offense. Wilson has about the speed of Zac Lee. Honestly though, they don’t need to be fast.
Like you said, Wisconsin’s major edge is the sheer efficiency and business-like demeanor of their offense. They do not make mistakes. None. They will rip holes open in the opposing defensive lines and take their five or six yards a play. Wisconsin has no problem with grinding out a drive from endzone to endzone.
Paul Chyrst is perfectly willing to move down the field short yards at a time. (Except against TCU; I’m taking that as more or less a huge “in the moment” brain fart.) He’s not going to be cute or toy with things that aren’t working.
Nebraska knows they have to bring their A+ game to sneak out a win.
It won’t be the night atmosphere at Camp Randall, or the big pressure of our inaugural Big Ten game, or even the #7 versus #8 billing of the game that kills Nebraska.
It’ll be the cold-hearted efficiency of the Badger offense.
If we take advantage of their average defense too much and don’t establish long, clock-killing drives, we’re just setting up our defense to get ground up and spit out by the machine.
"I did dumb things." - Tim Beck, Nebraska's new OC
by Salt Creek and Stadium on Sep 28, 2011 3:24 PM CDT reply actions
However
I read Bielema (sp?) comment that they don’t rotate offensive lineman. I dig that! Because, we’ve been rotating d-lineman all season. We should be able to outlast their physical intensity through four quarters. So long as our guys don’t mind-f*ck themselves.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Sep 29, 2011 12:26 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Well, to be honest, when you have five concrete blocks, it can be very difficult to get them to run to the sideline.
"I did dumb things." - Tim Beck, Nebraska's new OC
by Salt Creek and Stadium on Sep 29, 2011 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
But
concrete ages, cracks, and breaks.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Sep 29, 2011 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions
As long as it lasts four seasons, Wisconsin can replace it.
"I did dumb things." - Tim Beck, Nebraska's new OC
by Salt Creek and Stadium on Sep 29, 2011 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah
Don’t take advantage of their avg D, that would only lead to points, & then our poor D will have to go on the field.?! Time of possession won’t mean didly cuz we will score early, often & lightning fast. Our D is in great shape, they are rotating 8 guys on our D line, they will outlast Wiscy’s fat slow O line.
by SONOFLY on Sep 29, 2011 1:54 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Dude - calm down.
Why are you dragging Wisconsin down? Considering the problems our defense has had so far, I’d say it’d be in their benefit to have more time to digest what Wisconsin was doing so they can make adjustments on the fly. Having to go back on the field because of three-and-outs or quick scores isn’t going to stop a shootout or a blowout.
I can get behind rooting for our team and believing they can win every game. I’m on record as thinking we’ll win on Saturday.
But you’ve gotta stop reading the SEC propaganda. I’d rather Nebraska play and beat the best, and Wisconsin right now is our toughest opponent yet. And unless Nebraska can plug the gaps made by the “fat” offensive linemen, well, they’re going to have a tough time stopping Wisconsin’s running game. They love them some iso plays.
Nebraska is going to have their fight their way through the Big Ten this season. That’s what makes this season fun.
"I did dumb things." - Tim Beck, Nebraska's new OC
by Salt Creek and Stadium on Sep 29, 2011 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions
We
Shall see. I think it’s widely accepted as fact that Wiscy’s Oline is big & slow, so I’m not dragging them anywhere. Dude, look back to the beginning of last season, all the armchair experts were crying about the sky falling because we didn’t cream SDS. That is exactly what we are seeing now, & I know the Pelini bros will step up this Sat. Think about who you would rather be on the field longer, the turnover twins(O) or the Pelini D. If we score fast & easy, their O will get tired before ours, & will make mistakes late in the game. I think it’s hilarious that we were dragging our O down early in the season & now we decide to do the same to our D. Why is it ok to drag our boys down but not the opponent? Gusfraba & GBR!
by SONOFLY on Sep 29, 2011 4:47 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
good luck Huskers!
This Sooner fan is pulling for you.
by IBleedCrimsonandCream on Sep 29, 2011 5:22 AM CDT via iPhone app reply actions 1 recs
If our
defense doesn’t step it up this week it could get ugly. Wisky’s defense isn’t known for being great either but in a shoot out I would bet on Wisconsin. They remind me of the Husker teams of the mid 90’s. Sheer brute force and power. They don’t pass cause they don’t have to. I think Crick has to live up to or surpass his preseason hype for us to have a chance.
Except they do pass.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Only because they have a QB who can throw the ball.
Usually their passing attack is limited to ten or so play action passes a game. Which is why Toon and their other receivers are really meant to be blocking receivers rather than possession receivers. (And their low career numbers accent this point.)
If you follow Navy or Georgia Tech, you’ll see the same thing with their triple-option attacks. They both have QBs who can throw the ball and so they’re relying less on running this season.
(Ricky Dobbs led that revolution at Navy, and Niumatalolo liked it so much he went out and got himself a passing option QB, rather than the traditional scrambling QB.)
So look for Wisconsin to return to their rush-rush-rush-punting ways next season.
"I did dumb things." - Tim Beck, Nebraska's new OC
by Salt Creek and Stadium on Sep 29, 2011 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, I was just talking about this year.
This Wisconsin team is a bit different than what we are used to seeing. He’s averaging over 250 yards passing per game, isn’t he?
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Some crazy high number.
Nick Toon is going to have a career season purely because they actually have a passing QB.
"I did dumb things." - Tim Beck, Nebraska's new OC
by Salt Creek and Stadium on Sep 30, 2011 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions
That
may be true but they have him this year and have been using him and the recievers effectively. So to say they don’t have a good passing game isn’t correct. I am not saying they will light it up but they are very comparable to Tommie Frazier and Brook Berringer. Not enough attempts to be considered real good or get noticed but the attempts they get are very affective. And with the way our secondary has been playing lately we had better hope Bo and Carl can spread some magic dust on them Saturday.
Oh ya
maybe we could get some quick lessons on ball security while we are at Madison!!!!!!!!

by 



























