Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

Television Broadcasts Still Unknown for Nebraska / Chattanooga Game (UPDATED!)

It's now officially a game week as the Nebraska-Chattanooga game is now less than a week away. Nowever, if you look at the official schedule at Huskers.com and BigTen.org, television broadcast details are still unknown. All we know is the 2:30 p.m. game time.

Well, that's not all we know.  Earlier this week, Kevin Kugler of Omaha radio station KOZN-1620 AM stated that he had been assigned by the Big Ten Network to call this Saturday's game and that former Husker Ahman Green would also be part of the telecast.

So why hasn't Nebraska, the Big Ten, or BTN announced the broadcast yet?  CN contacted BTN for an update last week, and we have yet to receive a response.

Update to this story:

Monday 8/29 2 p.m. 

A search of BTN's "GameFinder" service shows the Chattanooga at Nebraska game will be available on Cox cable channel 233.  However, Cox is moving BTN to channel 80 this week. Sean Callahan of Rivals reports via Twitter that he hopes to get an official statement from Cox later this afternoon.

Monday 8/29 2:45 p.m.

BTN has released their "BTN 101" feature which finally announces that BTN will broadcast the Chattanooga and Fresno State games.  Cox Cable is listed as a provider as is Time Warner, Dish Network, and DirecTV.  Use "Game Finder" to find the channel on your system.  Cox Cable customers should double check with Cox as Cox is moving BTN to new channels.

Star-divide

Since all we can do is speculate, it appears that there still are issues preventing BTN from broadcasting the game. Back in July, it was reported that the BTN was still negotiating with Cable One (Norfolk), Charter (Kearney), Cox (Omaha), and Time Warner (Lincoln, Columbus) to reach an "in-state" agreement like BTN has with cable operators in other states with Big Ten schools. On average, BTN charges providers in Big Ten territory an average of 88 cents a subscriber, but only five cents a subscriber elsewhere. If these cable systems failed to reach an in-state agreement with BTN, those cable systems would not be carrying the game.

Since then, the Nebraska athletic department has announced agreements with Cable One, Charter, and Time WarnerCox Cable did move BTN to a basic package that requires a digital converter, but apparently has not met the Big Ten's requirements for carrying Nebraska games.  And that appears to be the sticking point that is holding up the formal announcement of the BTN broadcast of the Nebraska/Chattanooga game.

Here's what I think is going to happen:  Unless Cox comes to a revised agreement with BTN this week, the Nebraska/Chattanooga game will be televised on one of the BTN's alternate channels and will be blacked out on Cox Cable. Customers on DirecTV, Dish Network, Time Warner Cable, Cable One, Charter, and CenturyLink TeleChoice will have the game.  The game will be produced by BTN, though it may not be branded as BTN. That so that cable companies inside of Nebraska (i.e. Cox) with pre-existing agreements with BTN can't claim rights to the Husker game. This situation isn't without precedence:  Cox previously has had disagreements with other broadcasters and Husker telecasts have been in jeopardy.

Time Warner has announced that the Nebraska-Chattanooga game will be available to their Nebraska customers, so you can be assured that the game will be televised.  If you have a satellite dish, DirecTV and Dish Network will have the game as well.  I would expect that if you are outside of Nebraska and have BTN, you'll be able to watch the game, probably on one of the BTN "Alternate Channels".  If you live inside of Nebraska, you probably should contact your cable operator to get a status update. Be careful if you are told that the game will be on BTN, because it probably won't be.  BTN is scheduled to show the Illinois/Arkansas State game at 2:30 p.m. Saturday, and any cable operators that haven recently updated their agreements with the Big Ten Network will be showing that game instead of the Husker game.

Sounds confusing? It sure is, and hopefully this gets resolved sooner rather than later. Based on past precedence, this could go all the way to later in the week as the real negotiations may not occur until the last minute.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This is BS. There’s nearly a million in the Omaha-Lincoln corridor and the stadium capacity is 85,000ish. The demand’s there.

My dad has Time Warner. He’ll get it. I have Cox. The only thing they’re efficient at is billing.

by efficiency on Aug 28, 2011 2:44 PM CDT reply actions  

RE COX

and KETV’s pulling the fact they want more money from cox for the signal.

by Andrew J Wees on Aug 28, 2011 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

On Friday's USA Today, the Chattanooga game is listed on the BTN

2:30 start. What’s funny is that the same paper doesn’t list the Fresno game on TV.

Google's homepage celebrates too much shit.

by meatybob on Aug 28, 2011 3:24 PM CDT reply actions  

BS

Charter has it on expanded digital same thing as cox.

by Andrew J Wees on Aug 28, 2011 4:55 PM CDT reply actions  

Here's the sticking point:

Last year, in the eight state Big Ten region, BTN charged an average of 88 cents a subscriber. Outside those eight states, BTN charges an average of five cents a subscriber.

The Big Ten wants cable companies to play something closer to 88 cents instead of five cents.

by Husker Mike on Aug 28, 2011 5:44 PM CDT reply actions  

So, it's Cox's fault they don't want to pay a 1600% increase in fees?

I understand they will have a higher demand now that the Huskers are a member of the B1G Ten. But that’s an insane increase. Even going from 0.05 to 0.50 a subscriber (900% increase) is a sizable jump.

I’m actually on the side of Cox in this case. ‘Cause I know if they cave, I’ll get yet another increase in my bill. (well…I’ll expect that anyway…it is Cox afterall)

by Wolvie on Aug 28, 2011 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not assigning blame to anybody here...

On the macro level, I think it’s insane what some of these cable networks charge. They bid for this programming using our money.

That being said, I think it’s a bit hypocritical for Cox to push back here when they’ve always heavily promoted those pay-per-view broadcasts in the past. And as you point out, Cox is going to jack up your rates again whether they agree to this or not.

And I need to make one thing clear: I think Cox is the sticking point here. I don’t know that for sure. I’m making that assumption because I cannot find any announcement that Cox and BTN have reached an agreement, and that’s the only reason why we don’t have any official announcement on broadcast arrangements for the first two games.

by Husker Mike on Aug 28, 2011 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess I didn't mean you directly, but like the post immediately below yours says

…if Cox screws this up…

I don’t see many, if any, messages about how BTN could screw this up, or BTN overcharging. Only that Cox is going to screw it up by not signing an agreement.

And, I don’t know why an agreement with Cox matters at all. Granted 1) I’m not a lawyer, and 2) Even if I was I haven’t seen the current contract Cox has with BTN. But, BTN is already carried by Cox. They already have a contract. What the terms are, when that contract expires, I haven’t heard. But BTN is going to broadcast the game, and it shouldn’t matter whether Cox has signed an agreement or not.

Frankly, if they don’t have a valid agreement anymore (it’s expired, or is no longer valid because of the shift in conference by the University), then BTN will broadcast the game and Cox will no longer be able show BTN. If the contract is still in effect until some date in the future, then BTN will broadcast the game and it should (better be) on Cox as well.

I’ll never see the day, but I still want to wake up to a world where I have control over what specific channels I have access too. Don’t tell me ala-carte can’t work. Then it’ll be up to ME if I want to pay 0.88/month for the BTN.

by Wolvie on Aug 28, 2011 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

There is a lot of subtlety here...

The game WILL be televised. Cox Cable does have an agreement with BTN. But unless Cox agrees to a new agreement with BTN (and I have seen nothing to suggest they have), Cox will only be showing the Illinois/Arkansas State game on Saturday afternoon. Meanwhile Time Warner, CenturyLink, DirecTV, and Dish Network (among others) will have the Nebraska/Chattanooga game as well.

As for ala carte, I’d love to have that to. But BTN in that world will probably be $3 a month, not 88 cents, because some people will not subscribe to BTN. Likewise, ESPN will be $10 a month.

by Husker Mike on Aug 29, 2011 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

0.05 to 0.88

the stick is that cox payed 0.05 to broadcast when we was outside of the BT realm…now we are part of that family they want the 0.88 cents that all other BT broadcatings pay!

by red rod on Aug 29, 2011 6:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Other options

What are other options as a Cox subscriber if Cox screws this up? Is the game streamed anywhere?

by David Schmitz on Aug 28, 2011 7:37 PM CDT reply actions  

None legally...

The Big Ten Network is launching BTN2Go… but it’s only available to customers of “participating providers”. So if Cox drops the ball, BTN2Go won’t help you either.

I’ve had good luck with ChannelSurfing last season, though that’s not exactly legal. The Department of Justice confiscated their main domain names last year, so it may be difficult to find. Your best bet if Cox blows this is to head to a sports bar with a dish.

And take heart. At least you aren’t a Longhorn fan who’s scrambling to find ANYBODY who carries LHN.

by Husker Mike on Aug 28, 2011 9:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just remember

Just because it’s illegal for them to stream it to you doesn’t mean it’s illegal for you to watch. That’s how I justified it last year, anyway. :)

by Cheeseandcorn on Aug 28, 2011 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

hey

kudos to Mike for following this whole situation, huh????

Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by Jon Johnston on Aug 28, 2011 11:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Agreed.

I’ve been increasingly concerned about being able to watch our opening game, so I’ve been checking in on the BTN site, and some site that lists all of the college football game’s air times.

On the latter site, they had listed our game as scheduled to be shown at 5:00 p.m. CST, which had me going crazy. I checked it again a few minutes ago, and it’s now listed for 2:30.

That said, I haven’t checked the BTN schedule again.

But, after now having to pay for BTN, and all of the hype on sites like this and others about how “we’ll never have to go the PPV route again”, the CHANCE of this game being tape-delayed is pissing me off to no end.

They're 18 to 22...how perfect were you at that age?
The Power of Red begins with the Passion of Walk-Ons.

by redvalley on Aug 29, 2011 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

ChannelSurfing updated their website and picked up a European domain. Everything still works like a charm. I’m not endorsing the site. But I’m not, not endorsing it either. Unfortunately, Illinois/Arkansas State is the standard channel game, so for us transplants in Iowa, we either need the alternate channels or have to go to a bar.

Chicken Coop, here I come.

by the_EDJ on Aug 29, 2011 12:29 AM CDT reply actions  

For what it's worth...

We went through this whole ordeal on a similar level a few years ago when the BTN began. I can remember looking at television information as late as the Thursday before and thinking my cable provider would not carry BTN. When it came time for kickoff, it all worked out one way or another so hopefully you guys won’t have anything to worry about come Saturday. Good luck and welcome to the Big Ten.

There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you.
- Woody Hayes

Twitter: NormConquest

by Culp's Freaking Hill on Aug 29, 2011 7:32 AM CDT reply actions  

I suspect we'll see midnight deals made.

No way a cable company in Nebraska is going to deny their customers a Nebraska game on TV.

They’ll lose their customers to DirectTV in a heartbeat.

We have five "National Championships"? Can we try and win the conference first?

by Salt Creek and Stadium on Aug 29, 2011 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

BTN Multiple Channels on Game Day

I’ve never really watched the BTN before so I’m in the dark of how it works but I do get it in St. Louis, MO through Charter. I only have one channel number of BTN but they often broadcast multiple games at once. My question is should there be additional BTN channel numbers during these simultaneous broadcasts of games or do they air games by region? Sorry if this is a dumb question but I’m trying to learn the BTN system.

by huskerforlife15 on Aug 29, 2011 10:58 AM CDT reply actions  

I have Charter up here in Wisconsin.

Their Sports View Plus package has the alternate BTN channels in the 300s (as well as all of the other sports networks like CBS Sports and ESPNU). Their standard digital package doesn’t include the alternate BTN channels.

Also once BTN2GO.com launches, you’ll be able to watch any live BTN stream on there. (Bypassing the need to pay $10/month for Sports View Plus).

We have five "National Championships"? Can we try and win the conference first?

by Salt Creek and Stadium on Aug 29, 2011 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the info!

I guess I need to look into upgrading my Charter package. Thanks for the info!

by huskerforlife15 on Aug 29, 2011 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Welcome!

We have five "National Championships"? Can we try and win the conference first?

by Salt Creek and Stadium on Aug 29, 2011 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

RE: Cox

I asked Cox about the Husker games, and this was their reply to my inquiry:

Thank you for your inquiry. Cox is committed to providing the best customer service possible.

 

The Big Ten Network is talking with all of the cable companies in Nebraska about carriage of the Big Ten Network, including all of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Husker) football games. Cox has been talking with the Big Ten Network about the University of Nebraska’s July 1st entry into the Big Ten conference. To date, the discussions have been favorable. Cox will continue to carry the Big Ten Network programming and we expect that to include the University of Nebraska games.

 

We currently carry the Big Ten Network on our Sports and Information Tier. It is located on channels 233 and 1233. We also have overflow channels 615, 616, 617 and 618.

 

At this time we know of no changes that will be made to our current lineup. If there are changes, there will be an announcement so that our customers are aware. Again we do plan to carry all of the Husker games this year.

 

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to let us know.

 

 

 

Thank you for choosing Cox Communications as Your Friend in the Digital Age!

by nickski on Aug 29, 2011 2:08 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CN needs your tips! Inform us with an email to: cornnation - at - gmail.com. Better yet, join the CN community and create a fanpost or fanshot!

FanPosts

SHOP THE CORN NATION STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Stanford Donor renames Offensive Coordinator Position
More Texa$$ Arrogance
Irish payout to Weis keeps piling up
Call me anal retentive, but this is NOT how Nebraska Baseball should make it to ESPiN. The best...
Building for the B1G. Recent aerial photo of Memorial Stadium expansion and Haymarket arena construction from HuskerMax.com.
Adam Carriker writes NEW blog, "Draft Day" on ProInterviews
Alfonzo Dennard bond set at $5000
Brook Berringer, 16 Years On....RIP, #18.

From our friends at HuskerMax.com.
Athletic Department Announces Two Options for Redeeming Spring Game Tickets
Adam Carriker writes about the Off-Season on Pro Interviews

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

Photo_6_small Jon Johnston

Rc_icon_small Husker Mike

Editors

Hobbes2_small JLew

Bern_hat_small Brian Speers

Mel-gibson-braveheart-photograph-c1010192231_small Billgrip

Sword_011_small Aaron Musfeldt

Rickysmith_small Ricky Smith

Al_bundy_vs_chobot_small Andy Ketterson

Authors

Cornguy_small Cobby

Sb22_small William Grubb

Pelini_small AdamTheTitan