Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Now They've Screwed Spurs, UEFA Willing To Review Rule

It is not nearly as bad as it seems for the Big 12...

So it’s been tough for the little dogs of the Big 12, and it looks to be getting harder with the departure of TA&M.  Don’t slit your wrists – it isn’t as bad as it seems.

 Take a breath and count your blessings.

TA&M was a UT wannabe – that’s why they left.  It wasn’t about money (they were getting about as much from the Big 12 as they will from the SEC).  It wasn’t about the LHN (it still exists).  It wasn’t about UT demands (they favored TA&M as well).  It was because they wanted to be Texas, but the state populous wasn’t going to let them.  Let TA&M fight with the Mississippi’s to see who stays out of the SEC west cellar – you are better off without another Texas.

 

Texas wants to be with you.  They really do.  Sure, they are loud and can be a bully – they deserve every insult you sling their way.  They are also giving up a sizable chunk of change to stay with you, gave up an offer of millions to stay, and that has to count for something.  Without them you might be lumped in with the mid majors.

 

Oklahoma says they want to stay with you.  They don’t seem to mind the Texas demands since they also help the Sooners, they are making SECish money in an easier conference, and they don’t have your anxieties as they know they could take their brand to 4 other majors.

 

The Buffs weren’t much of a loss and are now running their own kind.  Nebraska may have hurt the prestige but in the end, your shared revenue went up after they left – it worked out well for all.

 

You just sold about 40 games for $90 Million a year… and those are the games after someone else chooses the best 20.  You are making ACCish money, and when the next contract is renewed in a few years, you will be very close to SECish money (and about ½ will be making the same or more than the SEC).

 

So put the gun down and the razors back in the medicine cabinet - once you take a breath and put your anxieties aside, you can see you are in a stronger position than given credit.  The ones you hate are actually helping.  The adversity has made you richer and better off.

Star-divide

Even if they leave, you aren’t dead.

You still have that most cherished and sought after carrot – you have BCS AQ status.  Let them all leave for greener pastures as you collect an exit fee to soften the landing, then invite the best of the mid majors.

 

Your teams know the requirements to keep BCS AQ status.  They don’t have to be stellar.  As long as you look more like a major than a mid major, you are still in.  You just need to be a little better than the MWC, and reasonably close to the Big East.  This shouldn’t be difficult since you would be taking the best the MWC has to offer.

 

 

Consider Contraction.

As long as you have Texas, it’s a valid option.  After all, it isn’t how much money your conference makes, it is how much money each program makes.

 

If you lose 1 program, offer the networks 10% off their contract for 10% fewer games.  If you lose 2, offer 20% off for 20% fewer games.  It is a good deal for most – programs that leave were probably pocketing more than the average because of unbalanced revenue sharing.  ESPN is in the sweet part of their contract – the latter half where you are undervalued – they don’t want to break the deal.  Fox might gripe if Oklahoma leaves, otherwise they really just wanted Texas and an expanded presence in major college football.

 

Unfortunately, Texas and OU may not buy into contraction.  They are getting above the average, so contraction might cut their revenue.  Texas is also hunting buddies with ESPN and might work together to hose you (outlined below).  It bites, but it is still better than if they weren’t around.

 

Try to avoid more from Texas.

Your biggest issues can be traced to being small.  You just don’t cover much of the country or very many homes.  You need a larger area, not more of the same area.

 

Unfortunately, ESPN Texas may force this because it would be beneficial to ESPN the LHN to have another Texas team in the league.  Maybe someone in the state would actually want ESPN9 the LHN if they showed 2 home teams facing off rather than a scrimmage with a scrub.  It bites, but it is still better than if they weren’t around.

 

 

If Texas and ESPN allows, you can try the Big East.

What you consider table scraps is pretty good money to them.  They will be leery, so you will want to skip past that Beebe guy and just send Texas to assure them they are in the conference for the long haul.

 

Forget the basketball schools.  Basketball isn’t going to add to your shared revenue.  Peruse the revenue sheets and you will see the BCS revenue alone is worth almost as much or more to you than the entire BB post season.  In most broadcast contracts, BB is almost a 2nd thought to NCAAF games, just a little something to sweeten the pie.

 

Don’t go further than you need.  The Big East football just isn’t worth it.  You will spend more on travel costs than you will keep in your broadcast contracts.

 

Forget Cincinnati.  In Ohio, the fan base equation is:

tOSU fan base  +  Cincinnati fan base  =  tOSU fan base.

 

Louisville looks tempting but you need football fans in large numbers.  Aside from little fan base interest in NCAAF, they are splitting less than 4.5 million people between 2 programs – that’s not much bigger than the state of Oklahoma.  You can find better.

 

South Florida looks better.  Sure, they are the 4th fan favorite in their state, but it’s a large state and a huge campus which equates to lots of alumni.  I think you can get a lot of passing interest – USF isn’t a hated rival by other teams in the state, so some home state yahoos might tune in just to root for a home team.

 

Pitt is a good option.  They are the 2nd program in a populous state with a decent (though underperforming) football team.

 

 

There are a couple of good options closer to home and you don’t have to stay in Texas to find them.

 

BYU brings a lot of baggage which has effectively kept them out of the majors.  They have funny beliefs and some weird requirements, but they are really nice people.  They don’t care as much about money – they regard their players as ambassadors.  They want exposure, and boy would they love for a chance to be in a BCS game or at least a bowl someone watches.

 

They have their own network as well as their own broadcast contract with ESPN, but ESPN will probably be glad to move the contract to the Big 12, and your broadcast structure works well for their network.

 

They bring a lot to the table.  They are nearby.  They are 1 of 2 teams in a small state, but they have a good size following nationwide including a lot of western states without a major football program.  They have a decent size athletic budget that would compare to the majors if they had the shared revenue.  They have had success for a while.  They might be the most major ready mid-major if you go back more than a few years… and if you don’t mind the baggage.

 

Air Force Academy usually isn’t a good team.  I wouldn’t say they have a large dedicated following or bring a big in state audience, but they are an academy.  People love to watch the academies, even when they suck, even if they cheat a little when the refs aren’t looking, because they are all servicemen who may soon be in combat, and that alone is worth pausing the channel changer for a few possessions.

 

Boise has had a lot of success on the field, but doesn’t bring a large fan base (I noted above you need to increase the head count).  They are the closest thing the mid majors have to a brand program, but they could be forgotten with 2 consecutive bad years.  If you have problems keeping your BCS AQ status, give them a call, otherwise they aren’t the answer to your main problems.

 

 

Then again, Texas and ESPN will be calling the shots, and you might get saddled with another team from Texas, so just keep reminding yourself you are better off with them than without them.

Poll
Reading this made me feel...
Like I am being conned - not buying any of it
8 votes
Like slitting my wrist - I feel more depressed than before
3 votes
Like I need a new hobby - making fun of the Big 12 won't be the same
10 votes
Like giving someone a hug - I am so relieved
0 votes
Like everything is going to be all right
1 votes
I don't read past the headlines and polls - I just troll the comments
5 votes

27 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost created by a registered user of Corn Nation.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

So much of the “big 12 ain’t so bad..what’s the problem” haven’t read the LHN/ESPN contract or seen how it’s going to be used.

Ultimately if you want to watch OU-Missouri Softball..you will have to do it on the LHN and pay UT for the privialge. Or if you want to watch Tech and New Mexico football game…you will have to pay UT for that too. (and by pay, I mean eyeballs and cable subscriptions and ad dollars all lead back to UT eventually)

That simply is an unworkable set up.

by Redhawk on Aug 14, 2011 10:52 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Considering it unworkable is irrelevant...

…unless you have the ability to affect change.

ESPN owns all broadcast rights of the SEC compared to a portion of the Big 12.
ESPN can choose to air TA&M games on ESPN the LHN.
From an ESPN business standpoint, this might be very desirable for the body bag games and sports other than football involving teams from Texas.
TA&M may have given more games to the LHN, not less, while removing any negotiating power they had with Texas or ESPN.

The direct answer to concerns about the LHN would be a conference with fewer ties to ESPN – the PAC or the Big Ten (the Big East hasn’t checked in). This is an option known to be available to 4 programs at most – TA&M., TT, OU, Okie Lite.

The better option is a negotiated settlement. While this is available to all, only the 4 programs above have any known leverage with ESPN via a threat to move to the Big Ten or PAC. You don’t need to ask for a lot, just restrictions on non-UT contests shown on the LHN. This option is lost if the programs leave the Big 12.

A legal or legislative action might be available, but I would be surprised. ESPN likely has a tight contract, legislative action might be deemed illegal. This would be best left as a last resort option for the 5 programs with no other options.

Even in your examples, there are benefits to the other Big 12 members.
If you can get the LHN to show sports like softball across a populous state, the exposure can help with recruiting.

by ProveIt on Aug 14, 2011 10:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just feel

that the big XII is gonna implode in under 3 years. Sure that is talk about bringing in other teams,but really,who would want to go into what is basically a one team conference? (and by that i mean who is driving,not who is winning,since OU basically owns texas) Oh,and i got a reaaaaallly good laugh when i read somewhere that the big XII might go after ND. My god,the expansion of two ego’s the size of Notre Dame’s and Texas in one conference would cause the sun to supernova

by Omahusker on Aug 15, 2011 12:16 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

How about...
Sure that is talk about bringing in other teams,but really,who would want to go into what is basically a one team conference?

With OU, they are not a 1 team conference.
Every mid major would jump at the chance to join an FBS conference.
With OU and Texas, you can add most of the Big East to the potential list – their shared revenue is dismal.

by ProveIt on Aug 16, 2011 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

It is that bad for the Big12.

They are in danger of losing most of their perennial powerhouse programs and key collegiate insitutions in the league – only to be replaced with who? School from non BCS conferences, most likely.

If it’s “not that bad”, it’s because it’s worse than whatever “not that bad” is.

by SteveW0720 on Aug 15, 2011 1:07 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Being in danger is relative...

All but 3 majors are in danger of losing their top teams. Nothing specific to the Big 12 here.
All those remaining in the Big 12 already turned down offers. TA&M is the only one to have expressed regrets at turning them down.
I am not confident you would expect this from the ACC or east big dogs.

Who says they need to be replaced? In looking at revenue per program, contraction isn’t a bad financial idea. If they need replacements, 4 are listed that could be expected to have interest and contribute at least their share of revenue.

I am not convinced OU administrators have as much a beef with Texas as the others. They have benefited from what other gripe about. Moving won’t eliminate other beefs (like the LHN)… and let’s not forget they are interested in their own program network. Having 20% or more of your teams among the top 10 franchises in NCAAF bodes well for the Big 12’s future.

You are starting with the assumption of instability the predicting downfall.
But if almost all of the teams wither want to be in the Big 12, or have to be in the Big 12 because of lack of interest, the instability doesn’t exist.

by ProveIt on Aug 16, 2011 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CN needs your tips! Inform us with an email to: cornnation - at - gmail.com. Better yet, join the CN community and create a fanpost or fanshot!

FanPosts

SHOP THE CORN NATION STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Stanford Donor renames Offensive Coordinator Position
More Texa$$ Arrogance
Irish payout to Weis keeps piling up
Call me anal retentive, but this is NOT how Nebraska Baseball should make it to ESPiN. The best...
Building for the B1G. Recent aerial photo of Memorial Stadium expansion and Haymarket arena construction from HuskerMax.com.
Adam Carriker writes NEW blog, "Draft Day" on ProInterviews
Alfonzo Dennard bond set at $5000
Brook Berringer, 16 Years On....RIP, #18.

From our friends at HuskerMax.com.
Athletic Department Announces Two Options for Redeeming Spring Game Tickets
Adam Carriker writes about the Off-Season on Pro Interviews

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

Photo_6_small Jon Johnston

Rc_icon_small Husker Mike

Editors

Hobbes2_small JLew

Bern_hat_small Brian Speers

Mel-gibson-braveheart-photograph-c1010192231_small Billgrip

Sword_011_small Aaron Musfeldt

Rickysmith_small Ricky Smith

Al_bundy_vs_chobot_small Andy Ketterson

Authors

Cornguy_small Cobby

Sb22_small William Grubb

Pelini_small AdamTheTitan