Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yankees Deny Rumors That Team Is For Sale

Will Nebraska's New Offense Take The Big Ten By Storm? Previewing The No-Huddle

Rumors came out during spring about Nebraska moving to a no-huddle offense. Shawn Watson had found a new job at Louisville and Tim Beck had taken over the offense. Beck had to do something to jump start them. People were starting to believe that Nebraska couldn't consistently score 30 points a game anymore against average to above average teams.

In trying to figure out what the Husker's might do, people try to brainstorm some ideas. The thought process became:

1) Bo knows defense.

2) Because he knows defense, Bo also knows what kind of offense gives him the most trouble, which led to

3) The possibility of Nebraska implementing a no-huddle attack. Speculation then ensued that Nebraska would implement a system similar to Oregon or Oklahoma.

Of course, there is no perfect offensive system. If there was, everyone would run it. Systems have to be designed around the players available and players must be recruited to run specific systems. The clip below is Oregon running their offense versus Stanford last year. You'll also noticed a strategy implemented by Stanford (and other teams) to try and slow down Oregon.

 

Star-divide

So what exactly is a "no-huddle" offense? It simply means that after a play is run, the offense gets to the line of scrimmage as quickly as possible. The offense could be a spread-em-out Texas Tech style or it could be an old fashion Nebraska power running game. It's all about getting to the line of scrimmage quickly after the play ends. There are many advantages to doing this. Some include:

If the defense isn't ready, you can catch them out of position and get big yardage or they can get a penalty for encroachment, etc.

It becomes harder to substitute players in-between plays. The offense knows when it can substitute, but the defense has to guess.  Plays can be run towards either side of the field, but plays that end closer to the offense's sideline can allow the offense to sneak in a substitute because the ball will be lined up closer to their side. This is a good way to wear the defense down.

If you line up with a lot of time on the play clock you can see how the defense lines up and potentially call a different play. Attack them where they aren't. Audible to a weakness.

There can also be some disadvantages to the no-huddle as well. If you suck at it and go 3-and-out, you just give the ball back to the opposing team quicker. If they are good, they can put more points up on the board.

If you are not conditioned for it, it will be less effective. If you are a defender on a team that runs the no-huddle, and your offense goes 3-and-out, your time resting on the bench is less than it would be for a traditional offense that goes 3-and-out.

So what does Bo have planned? Well, we probably won't know everything about the new offense until mid-to-late October. Some clues have come out from some of the players, though. Back in spring, the coaches kept stressing the word "physical" (but they stress that every spring). The players were saying that the playbook was about 50-50 run/pass.

The word from players is that the system is no-huddle, for the most part, and designed to adjust on the fly to opposing defenses. Quarterback Taylor Martinez said it's 50-50 run-pass.

There was also talk of more shotgun formations.

Sophomore quarterback Taylor Martinez – speaking to the media for the first time since November – confirmed the Huskers will use a version of a no-huddle offense that just happens to be similar to the attack Martinez ran at Corona (Calif.) Centennial High School. There, Martinez primarily operated out of the shotgun and threw swiftly to his receivers, sometimes within a second of receiving the snap.

With Taylor's speed, I think it's safe to say that the zone read isn't going anywhere. It may not be the bread-and-butter, but it's still going to be in the play book. You're going to see a lot of looks from the offense. Skill players will line up all over the field to keep the defense guessing. The spring game show us a lot of the fullback and some old fashioned power running, so it will be interesting to see how Beck does this. We don't want our opponents to see us line up in the shotgun and expect pass and also line up in the "I" and expect a run all the time.

I think the biggest concern I have right now is Beck's plan to use hand signals to send in the plays. During spring, the players talked about having to learn all of these signals and how long it's taking to do so. This doesn't sound like something that they can just change up every week for a different opponent. So after four games, our conference foes could use the game tape to see what the hand signals mean. Not sure that's a great idea, but we will see how it goes.

Junior tight end Kyler Reed said NU will use hand signals to call plays from the sideline. Wide receivers will no longer shuttle the plays in and out, and Nebraska will rarely form a traditional huddle. The offensive tempo, Reed, said, will vary on the situation.

"It doesn't have to be high tempo," Reed said. "It can. It can be like a huddle tempo, too, where we just kinda wander up to the line and get the signal. Or it can be fast. We have to learn the hand signals."

This past week, the guys at the Lincoln Journal Star interviewed some of the players at the Big Ten meetings and where able to piece together some more information regarding the new offense.

 

 

All-in-all it should be exciting to see what Nebraska's no-huddle ends up looking like. I, for one, would love to see a power running game molded into our no huddle. Toss in a serious passing threat, and it could be unbeatable. Not sure it's ever been done before, either. What do you think Nebraska's no-huddle should look like and are you excited for it?

 

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Here's the thing...

Introducing the no-huddle will have little to no-effect on Nebraska’s effectiveness on offense, simply because B1G defenses are used to seeing no-huddle, fast attack offenses at this point (see: Northwestern pretty much since 2000, Michigan under RichRod, Purdue at various points since about 1998, etc.).

The no-huddle system has some advantages in terms of limiting opposing teams from substituting, but you also have a number of short drives/short times of possession that don’t allow your defense to rest — you’ll note, the three teams I mentioned above rarely have had commanding defenses, in no small part because to have a great, top-tier defense, your offense needs to sustain drives and hold onto the ball (allowing your defense to rest). Plus, you need to REALLY trust your QB in this system, to play calm, collected, mistake-free football — I respect the hell out Taylor Martinez’s god-given talent, but do you really think he’s “there” yet in terms of having complete and calm command of the offense?

by Chadnudj on Aug 1, 2011 9:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Well, the Sooners had top notch defenses while running the no-huddle

Probably more an issue of depth, which Neb should have as well, esp. on the dline.

On if Martinez can actually pull it off, I dunno, we’ll see.

Google's homepage celebrates too much shit.

by meatybob on Aug 2, 2011 7:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

It might work...

Regardless of evidence, this is all about relative effectiveness. For the past two years, we have fielded championship-level defense. With the exception of Oklahoma State last year, and Washington for a quarter in the Holiday Bowl, we have been lights out. This isn’t to say we would have won the title, but our defense was good enough to get us there IF we had a semblance of a real offense… we didn’t.

We lost to aTm last year because we couldn’t get into field goal range. I don’t care what the officials did. Scoring 6 points was unacceptable. So long as our offense can be slightly more effective than last year, I do think we’re in a good position. It doesn’t hurt that I do feel like our skill players are going to be great. Burkhead is a beast, Martinez has a first step like no one else, and Kinnie can catch the ball. We have some great TEs (Kyler Reed is a name to remember), and we’re probably two deep on the line (kinda). Will that be enough? Hard to say, but I think our defense will make life easier for the offense and as long as they’re good enough, we’ll be sitting pretty.

Always check the words with the red squiggly line. They mean you probably screwed up.

by KennardHusker on Aug 2, 2011 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Must is a strong word
in no small part because to have a great, top-tier defense, your offense needs to sustain drives and hold onto the ball (allowing your defense to rest)

That’s a causation misnomer, caused in large part because there are so many examples of teams with great offenses and bad defenses.

It’s pretty easy to identify that problem if you look at the start of each half, when the team is most rested. If you find a huge deviation, then it can be a causation problem.

Usually, however, it’s just a correlation that is creating a causation misnomer. The 2009 Nebraska defense is a great counter example. Look at how many plays they were on the field. If the defense can get the opposing offense off of the field, it doesn’t really matter how short your offensive drives are, because the defense will be well rested.

College football has a lot of examples of teams with fast scoring offenses but great, dominant defenses.

That’s not the say that defenses can’t be on the field so long that it becomes an issue, but it is a localized, not global issue. Even dominant defenses can find themselves in situations where they are constantly on the field, some of which are positive. I actually heard a fan during the Idaho game complaining about the first half time of possession stats, despite the fact Nebraska had a severe deficit for a stretch because they were scoring too many consecutive touchdowns. T.O.P is an overrated and misused statistic, and nothing highlights that more than a 21-3 stretch.

by Brophog on Aug 5, 2011 4:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Keep in mind

that if the offense substitutes, the defense must be given the opportunity to do so as well. From the 2011 Rule Book, Section 5 under “Periods, Time Factors, and Substitutions”

While in the process of substitution or simulated substitution, Team A is
prohibited from rushing quickly to the line of scrimmage with the obvious
attempt of creating a defensive disadvantage. If the ball is ready for play,
the game officials will not permit the ball to be snapped until Team B has
placed substitutes in position and replaced players have left the field of play.
Team B must react promptly with its substitutes.

Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by Jon Johnston on Aug 2, 2011 9:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Another thing

one might question how well the offensive line will do with the up-tempo nature of the no-huddle when they have had a difficult time of avoiding false part penalties the past few seasons…..

Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by Jon Johnston on Aug 2, 2011 1:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Let's hope Yoshi really did get into better shape over the summer.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Aug 3, 2011 12:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Good Point

No huddle situations often create both confusion in the snap count and lengthy periods in a set position, each possibly increasing the likelihood of a false start.

On the plus side, an offensive style, such as Kansas ran much of the Reesing/Meier era called for ultra quick passing, removing much of the anticipation factor from the offensive line. False starts are caused by a lot of things, but anticipation and over-thinking are two of them, and such a system that calls for them to essentially take up defensive numbers, rather than be primary cogs, removes much of that.

by Brophog on Aug 5, 2011 4:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

What do you think Nebraska's no-huddle should look like and are you excited for it?

I like you would love o see some power run fit into the no huddle. Maybe our TE’s can motion into and out of the backfield and help block. Also some misdirection trapping would help move in the middle. I am not sure about T Magic, (nickname or player) but beleive his elite athleticism deserves another look. Brion Carnes is intriguing. I also love our backfield options. Maybe a 2 RB system with Burkhead/Heard bringing the thunder and Green/Abdullah with the lightning.

Go Big Red!

by jimmutt on Aug 4, 2011 10:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CN needs your tips! Inform us with an email to: cornnation - at - gmail.com. Better yet, join the CN community and create a fanpost or fanshot!

FanPosts

SHOP THE CORN NATION STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Stanford Donor renames Offensive Coordinator Position
More Texa$$ Arrogance
Irish payout to Weis keeps piling up
Call me anal retentive, but this is NOT how Nebraska Baseball should make it to ESPiN. The best...
Building for the B1G. Recent aerial photo of Memorial Stadium expansion and Haymarket arena construction from HuskerMax.com.
Adam Carriker writes NEW blog, "Draft Day" on ProInterviews
Alfonzo Dennard bond set at $5000
Brook Berringer, 16 Years On....RIP, #18.

From our friends at HuskerMax.com.
Athletic Department Announces Two Options for Redeeming Spring Game Tickets
Adam Carriker writes about the Off-Season on Pro Interviews

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

Photo_6_small Jon Johnston

Rc_icon_small Husker Mike

Editors

Hobbes2_small JLew

Bern_hat_small Brian Speers

Mel-gibson-braveheart-photograph-c1010192231_small Billgrip

Sword_011_small Aaron Musfeldt

Rickysmith_small Ricky Smith

Al_bundy_vs_chobot_small Andy Ketterson

Authors

Cornguy_small Cobby

Sb22_small William Grubb

Pelini_small AdamTheTitan