ESPN Suspends Bruce Feldman Over Mike Leach Book "Swing Your Sword"
ESPN has apparently suspended writer, journalist, and all-around good guy Bruce Feldman for his participation in Mike Leach's new book "Swing Your Sword". I have not yet had a chance to read Leach's book, but if ESPN wanted to send a message about it, they perhaps couldn't have given it more publicity than they did in suspending Feldman.
I had the opportunity to deal with Feldman when I reviewed his book "Meat Market". The book is excellent, and Feldman followed the review up by doing an interview with me. You'd expect that kind of attention when an author is promoting a book, but that wasn't what sold me on the guy.
It was the podcasts he did with the guys at In The Bleachers. Hell, he even spent a season picking games with us (I suck at that, so you know). I knew the guys running the site a while back, and they commented on how gracious Feldman was to them, that he was genuinely pretty decent. Given that (at the time) we were seen as just a bunch of bloggers, sitting around in our underwear in our mother's basement, that's a helluva statement. Thing is, if you ask around, Feldman is one of those guys that always takes the time to respond to people. You know, a decent human being, which are apparently in short supply these days.
It really isn't that hard to guess why Feldman was suspended, despite (allegedly) having permission to work on the Leach book. I've recently finished reading the book "Those Guys Have All The Fun" about ESPN. At first, I was skeptical (much like I was with John J. Miller's Roosevelt book), but once I picked it up, I was enthralled. I'll spare you the whole details (and do a full review later), but "Those Guys" details the beginnings of ESPN and takes you all the way through to present day. You're told the story of an evolution - the fledgling network that changes how we consume sports to a network that cannot stand any criticism, especially if that criticism comes from within.
Leach's book doesn't have a lot of nice things to say about Craig James, but it's not like that should be a shock to anyone. It shouldn't have been much of a shock to ESPN either, but given their history (In "Those Guys", Bill Simmons talks about getting in trouble for a podcast a full four-and-a-half months after it was released), the suspension is right on par. Never mind that ESPN has the largest conflict of interest known to mankind, wanting the appearance of a news organization while jealously protecting the interests it serves (cough, Ben Roethlsberger story, cough), this is who they are - petty, thin-skinned, and narcissistic.
Unfortunately for ESPN, this suspension will backfire. Feldman is immensely popular, and if you had to make a choice between listening to Mike Leach or Craig James do commentary, how many of you would pick James?
Ultimately, the suspension makes James more unlistenable than ever while Feldman will be fine. He's an excellent writer and if ESPN doesn't bring him back, someone else will pick him up. If he's looking for a home where he can be free to write whatever he wants, perhaps he should consider SB Nation. We're not bound by petty constraints and the network continues to grow by leaps and bounds. Proof? Tonight I'm in the living room now, fully clothed, and the gin is Bombay Sapphire.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ridiculous.
That’s about all I have to say.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Bruce Feldman > Craig James
I wonder if Craig James would be behind this, I know he is only a reporter but maybe he’s good buddies with those guys above him. If Feldman did indeed get approval for this then he should be fine and could probably sue and go work for a cool company (SBNation???).
It is what it is and we are who we are.
Sober (again) since January 10th, 2011.
Not all those who wander are lost. /////// I dont mind stealing bread.
The thing is...
…that we won’t really have a choice with respect to Craig James. You generally don’t decide which games to watch based on who the commentators are, and the networks each decide who goes behind the microphone.
That being said, I don’t know what Bruce Feldman’s work arrangement with ESPN is like, but if I’m USA Today, Sporting News, Yahoo!, or Sports Illustrated, I’m looking to hire him away from the Borg.
Truth be told, unless we learn something more about this that explains the suspension, Feldman’s going to come out fine long-term.
We don't choose who works the game for ESPN,
You generally don’t decide which games to watch based on who the commentators are…
But I sure am glad I can shut my TV’s sound off during football games!
Wish I could sync the TV picture with the radio calls on Husker games like in the past. (All this digital technology is supposed to be a good thing?) Maybe if I ran the sound through one DVR, the picture through another, then tried to manually sync them…
Not surprising at all
James’ behavior in the whole affair was beyond ridiculous. From reports I’ve read since the incident, it appeared that Adam James, after an initial tantrum, had decided it was no big deal and to let things blow over, but Craig James, stung over losing all his pssing matches with Leach over Adam;s playing time, pushed things to the limit with Tech and wasn’t shy about using his position at ESPN to do so.
ESPN’s coverage of the affair was hilariously one-sided. Current & former players and assistant coaches came out of the woodwork left & right to defend Leach, but ESPN’s story repeatedly focused on one disgruntled former wide receiver – at the end of which the anchor would mumble that many players had come to his defense. Unethical didn’t begin to describe their coverage as they didn’t even acknowledge Craig James’ role in the affair other than being Adam’s father.
Bring Bruce on board. I will happily donate half of my Corn Nation salary to him as an incentive.
"Bring Bruce on board. I will happily donate half of my Corn Nation salary to him as an incentive"
You sound like Kansas talking to Texas.
by HuskerHammer on Jul 15, 2011 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
btw
if you’d like to help recruit Bruce to SB Nation (and I’D LIKE THAT A LOT) – please send a tweet to @BFeldmanESPN
asking him to consider joining SB Nation. Use the hashtag #FeldmantoSBNation
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Jul 15, 2011 9:20 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
We did it with Rob Nyre, right?
Let’s do it again! Someone tweet for me please.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
I don't remember ESPN coverage of it being that skewed...
I remember James and Leach both being interviewed, at least for Leach, it was up to the point where he couldn’t talk anymore because of the lawsuit. And I remember watching on College Football Live where they noted and interviewed former players coming to his defense. For instance, I think that Harrell was interviewed. That wasn’t swept under the rug. And they did acknowledge James’ role in this, James himself addressed why he was getting involved in this. Granted, it was a shitty answer, something like “we just want to protect the players.” blah blah blah, but its an answer. Granted, maybe they didn’t address everything, but to say they were unethical about it is a bit dubious. And understand, its not like we knew everything immediately. Much of the testimony that Leach mentions happened 4 months after he was fired in December. (Or January, somewhere around there). And even then, how much of it was OK to use in the public at the time? I am guessing little to none of it.
Having said all that, do I think Feldman is very good? Most certainly. And do I understand why it seems like James has so much sway at ESPN to make this happen? Absolutely not. Do I think James is right about any of this? Absolutely not. Do I hope that this torpedoes James’ political career? Absolfrickenutely!
James must have some sort of leverage at ESPN that we don’t know.
Google's homepage celebrates too much shit.
James has more than leverage,
he has Spaeth.
"What the hell did you do that for"... Tubs Mom
by raider realist on Jul 15, 2011 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions
You obviously didn't watch the 2009 Alamo Bowl
and, to be fair, why would you? But it was basically 2.5 hours of ESPN presenting the James’ side of things and how all of the team has rallied around them interspersed with occasional mentions that there was a football game on.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Oh sure I did.
I remember plenty of cutaways to signs that said “Team Leach”. And yes, it was stupid for James to do the game in the first place. And what I remember is James saying some stupid comment about “protecting players” and the rest of it as support the interim staff so that they can “heal”. Listen, I am not supporting ESPN in any of this, and sure as hell not James, but I didn’t think that ESPN was way over the top in aggregate.
Google's homepage celebrates too much shit.
"this is who they are - petty, thin-skinned, and narcissistic."
Yep. A celebration of arrogance. But wtf is wrong with all of us? Why do we view a smug persona as if it is some kind of commendable attribute? Because that must be what market research reveals to ESPN, for that is all they give us. Colin Cowherd and the like. It’s enough to make me want to strangle a kitten in front of schoolchildren, just so that someone else can be as upset as I am.
I’m tired of the bombastic self-glorification that runs rampant every single place we look these days. When was the last time you remember some TV personality saying something truly self-effacing, unprompted by some asinine “scandal” involving their meaningless dalliances with random strange? This ESPN thing is just a microcosm of the whole, murky nightmare surrounding us. Nothing we read is real. All news corporations are owned by a small fist of conglomerates, whose interest, I assure you, is not revealing truth through sound journalistic practices. It is creating reality, by falsely presenting a manufactured account of events as irrefutable truth. What you wrote Jon, and what I started this post with, is frighteningly accurate. The only word I would change is “they.” This is who WE are today…while slogging through our modern existence as materialistic Consumers meekly swallowing the swill from those who would have us believe in their falsehoods.
Sorry. What a weird rant.
My verison of heaven...
would be if Craig James is the dedicated full-time broadcaster for the Longhorn Network.
Google's homepage celebrates too much shit.
If anybody deserved him, it would be them.
It is what it is and we are who we are.
Sober (again) since January 10th, 2011.
Not all those who wander are lost. /////// I dont mind stealing bread.
by nateforchiefs on Jul 15, 2011 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Ok, looks like the Mothership can be knocked down a few notches by an avalanche…they have just stated Bruce will resume normal activity again. Internet smack on the back of the hand musta hurt the bastards
What's funny is
ESPN said he was never suspended and that he would resume working, but you can’t resume something you were never told to stop, can you?
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
My opinion is that
Feldman’s silence was the most telling. Because Sports by Brooks broke the story, and they can be pretty iffy at times, and even ESPN’s story isn’t that bad, it could have been really nothing, kinda ignored at first and just poorly handled. Big companies do that all the time. But the fact that Feldman never contacted guys like Stewart Mandel and his peers at other news org. to say anything like ’its not a big deal" to cool off this, that I would argue is the most damning evidence that something was amiss.
Google's homepage celebrates too much shit.
Very well put!
ESPN said he was never suspended and that he would resume working, but you can’t resume something you were never told to stop, can you?

by 






















