Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

The Association of American Universities' members voted to end UNL's membership recently based on the university's inability to meet certain requirements, Chancellor Harvey Perlman said in an email to faculty and staff Friday. The vote required a two-thirds majority of the group's 62 other members.

[Update - Since it appears that many Big Ten fans (alumni) are coming to CN to reference the article above, I'd like you to also take a look an article from the Chronicle of Higher Education that states:

What put Nebraska at a particular disadvantage within the AAU is that the university's medical school is part of the statewide system, but not part of the flagship Lincoln campus. So the medical school's research dollars do not count toward Lincoln's AAU numbers. In an analysis conducted last year by The Chronicle, Nebraska's system as a whole outpaces at least 11 current AAU members.

about 1 year ago Sword_011_tiny Aaron Musfeldt 46 comments 1 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This plus

the recent (state funding issue) dropping of several majors and graduate programs makes me really conflicted with the several large athletic projects. I want the athletic program to be the best but I just wish some of that cash could go to academics. If we really want be a top university (laughable) then we need to start acting like one. What an odd time to be a student…

by Restnessizzle on Apr 29, 2011 4:43 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Or that money needs to be redirected to the hard sciences/engineering

To up our research attractiveness.

Engineering wouldn't be so bad if occam's razor worked.

by meatybob on Apr 30, 2011 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

I have to wonder

how many people actually knew what the AAU is before this happened. Maybe it’s a PR move by academic types.

Doesn’t sound like too big a deal – also sounds like the AAU doesn’t place much value on Agricultural Research, and more value on having a medical school as part of the University.

With regards to Ag Research – sounds like elitist bullshit to me. Apparently people don’t need to eat. That the world’s population continues to grow and there is interest in using bio-everything for fuel, you think it’d have more value than that.

Medical School – Hell, maybe they ought to just restructure and include UNO as part of UNL. What’s to stop that? Eliminate redundancy, save some money, take UNO’s hockey team and their medical school.

Dropping majors – the program my oldest son was going to go into was cut as part of that budget cut, so now we’re starting over from scratch. I’m not sure where he’s going to go to school, but I know this – he’ll be fine. He’ll be fine because he’s a bright young man, he’s healthy, and he has at least one normal parent – his mother.

Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by Jon Johnston on Apr 29, 2011 5:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Why USDA Money isn't counted

From the AAU Membership Membership Indicators:

The Membership Committee uses National Science Foundation (NSF) research expenditure data, excluding USDA expenditures. Most USDA funding is not allocated competitively, and USDA support accordingly is included as a Phase II indicator.

So no, it’s not elitist bullshit.

by Seth9 on Apr 29, 2011 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Sigh. Since When is Elite NOT a Good Thing?

“The most powerful, rich, gifted, or educated members of a group, community, etc”
or
“Representing the most choice or select; the best.”

Isn’t it the American way to strive to be the best, the most powerful, to be rich, to seek an education? Is it not a blessing to be gifted?
Don’t we want an elite football program?
Don’t we want elite academics?
Don’t we want our kids to strive to excel and and place themselves on elite teams, in elite company?

by UltimaRatioRegum on Apr 29, 2011 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know

if I ever need one, I’d like an elite surgeon.

I'm your huckleberry.

by Brizzle T on Apr 29, 2011 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

probably true

okay fine…. my post was somewhat reactionary.
okay, so it was pretty reactionary.

Damnit. I forgot to buy some gin and I live in a state where the liquor stores close at 10:00 pm.
Bastards!

Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by Jon Johnston on Apr 29, 2011 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

He would be right if...

…the AAU refused to count USDA money because of a bias against agricultural sciences. Because that would be arguably be elitist as such a bias could come from a bias against land-grant institutions or general intellectual snobbery. It would also be incredibly stupid.

by Seth9 on Apr 29, 2011 10:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

USDA funding is allocated by political means

And while other research is allocated by proposals to the NSF, but there is still a massive “who you know” component in academia. So lets not think that they are perfectly competitive in the true sense of the term.

This is rough.

Engineering wouldn't be so bad if occam's razor worked.

by meatybob on Apr 30, 2011 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Biased? Could Be. Elitest? Snobby? Nope.

Let’s try not to descend into populist victimhood. “Biased” as in the criteria did not favor us, not that it was duplicitous or some paranoid conspiracy to disenfranchise Nebraska.

“General Intellectual Snobbery”? Look, it SUCKS, but they had a very clear criteria that we have apparently been failing to meet for 10 years (or more). If a 1st team Husker was not pulling his weight, would you argue with Pelini to keep him on 1st team so we would not look “snobby” and "elitest’?

by UltimaRatioRegum on Apr 30, 2011 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not a Nebraska fan...

I’m an undergrad at Michigan. My interest in this issue comes from you joining our conference. And it is my opinion that if the AAU didn’t count USDA money because of some bias against the agricultural sciences, then it would be incredibly stupid. Furthermore, it could have been indicative of an element of academic elitism against land-grant institutions which is, in my opinion, counterproductive.

This is a moot point, however, because that is not the reason that USDA dollars aren’t counted.

by Seth9 on Apr 30, 2011 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ugh

Well I don’t think its a huge deal, but its still kind of embarrassing.

Also nice to hear (from the LJS article) that all the Big 12 members voted against kicking us out.

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Apr 29, 2011 8:30 PM CDT reply actions  

For those of you who aren't really up to date on this type of stuff

it is actually a REALLY big deal. There are 3 major things about AAU membership:
1. AAU membership was one of the criteria for the Big 10 when making selections. They will act like this does not matter in public, but I guarantee you in private this really angers the entire conference. The Big 10 has held their had on the idea that all members of the conference are AAU members for a while now and this is just going to lead continuing the stereotype that Neb is just a bunch of uneducated hicks.

2. AAU is one of the major keys that is looked at when dispersing research funding. The comment about being in the in the top x amount in % increase is a throw away number. The study does not mention % of the national whole or number of dollars compared to the AAU average but is in reference to the % increase the school has had over the time frame. While it is great to see the overall increase and growth in research dollars, lets not forget that it also is telling that that much of an increase still puts Neb well below most of the rest of the AAU. Without the AAU tag, those gains can easily go to ISU and Iowa as stay with Neb.

3. AAU membership is a key component in bringing in graduate students and faculty. Most of that is due to name recognition and the ability to have AAU affiliation with your degree or your scholarly research. Combine that with point 2 in regards to who gets what funding, and AAU is a great carrot to bring in the top young researchers in the country. Why go to a non-AAU school if you are qualified to go to an AAU? People tend to pick the easier path and the AAU membership helps provide funding and better colleagues in research opportunities.

Academics is a self perpetuating cycle. The problem is that it takes quite a bit of effort to get the engine running at a point that it can keep on sustaining itself.

Let us also not forget that the CIC membership is not an automatic given. Big 10 schools voted against Neb in keeping the AAU status, so it is not an automatic slam dunk the the CIC will now vote Neb in.

I am not trying to sit here and say the sky is falling, but this from an academic standpoint is a much much bigger deal than people are making of it.

This has come at by far the worst possible time (outside of it happening last summer and killing any possible Big 10 invite) due to the CIC approval in June and the entrance into the Big 10.

JD’s like, "you want some f*&#ing pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, b*#&hes!"- RCCook

LSB: "Oh s#*t, JD. You crazy!"

by laxtonto on Apr 30, 2011 12:51 AM CDT reply actions  

Nitpicking

but as far as I read it all Big 10 members voted for Nebraska.

by Restnessizzle on Apr 30, 2011 1:03 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

nope...
Perlman said most of the 11 other Big Ten universities supported UNL’s efforts to remain in the AAU, as did all of the Big 12 universities in the AAU.

All of the former Big 12 schools did, but I am guess 1 if not 2 of the current Big 10 schools (with Northwestern at the top of my list) did not. The worst part is even if NW voted against Neb, there where No votes to the remove Neb motion with 21 needed to keep the motion from passing So out of the remaining 45 members there wasn’t 4 that could be swayed Neb way? There has been talk about reducing the AAU’s size and I am not really shocked that schools voted against Neb just to have a better chance on Neb current research grants, but still 4 more schools where needed… 4

The whole thing just sucks.

JD’s like, "you want some f*&#ing pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, b*#&hes!"- RCCook

LSB: "Oh s#*t, JD. You crazy!"

by laxtonto on Apr 30, 2011 1:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would imagine

that with the economic status of some of the states where Big Ten schools are located that this had as much to do with economy as much as anything.

Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio – can you think of one, maybe besides Indiana that is doing okay. Name a university that isn’t facing budget cuts (I’m not looking it up, maybe there is one, but I doubt there’s much more than that).

One way to make up more research dollars – eliminate the competition.

Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by Jon Johnston on Apr 30, 2011 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think laxtonto's right here

This is a big deal, and while Perlman’s reasons have some real validity, they’re still essentially just an attempt to put a positive spin on what is unquestionably a blow for UNL.

Regardless of the reason, not being in the AAU is a big strike against a school with high-level research aspirations. Membership in the AAU is a major benchmark, especially within an academically elite conference like the Big Ten.

by Cheeseandcorn on Apr 30, 2011 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, its bad, but not end of world

Lots of good schools are not AAU members, Georgia for one. And there are others. One thing of interest is if you read the correspondence between the AAU and Perlman and look at the comprehensive list that the AAU used to rank the universities, the University of Alabama beats about 40% of current AAU schools on that metric.

I am sure your AAU invite is coming Bama.

Engineering wouldn't be so bad if occam's razor worked.

by meatybob on Apr 30, 2011 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Asking a question-

Why isn’t your Medical branch part of your UNL campus? This just seems like such a no brainer to add it 10 years ago when this was first brought up that I am curious as to why it wasn’t done.

"They say in Happy Valley that if God wasn’t a Penn State fan, why is the sky blue and white?" Fortt said. "Who am I to argue with God?"

by amandakt on Apr 30, 2011 9:33 AM CDT reply actions  

Boy, that makes for a political football...

NU has 4 campuses. The medical school is in Omaha, so it’s an odd fit with UNL. It might make more sense from an administrative perspective to merge it with Nebraska-Omaha. But that create a political football. The only one that it doesn’t fit at all with is Nebraska-Kearney.

I assume that the Med Center is separate from the other campuses for a reason, and while this might force a change, I really hope that it isn’t athletics that pushes it.

by Husker Mike on Apr 30, 2011 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Since we are all talking about this, anyone know why the Med Center is in Omaha, but the dental school is in Lincoln? And are they students of UNL or UNMC?

by ~OnlyJade~ on Apr 30, 2011 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm a Pre-Med/Neuroscience undergrad at UNL...

I actually looked into this when visiting UNMC, and it’s a crazy story. Before 1900, the Med School was actually in Lincoln along with the Dental and Law schools. The med school was extremely underfunded and they weren’t receiving any cadavers to do research with and teach students, so the medical students went and robbed graves at local cemeteries. The med school got caught doing this, and the University crapped their pants and moved the school to Omaha, which was still sort of fighting to be the state capitol. UNMC is now one of the top 10 medical schools in the country. If this is that big of a deal, I don’t see why Perlman can’t figure out a way to link our campuses back together. Plenty of Med schools around the country are separate from the main campus. Take KU, for example, whose Med school is actually in Kansas City.

by husker_doc on Apr 30, 2011 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am guessing that its a matter of structure vs. location

Engineering wouldn't be so bad if occam's razor worked.

by meatybob on Apr 30, 2011 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

It wouldn't be athletics pushing it

The CIC might not invite Nebraska unless they regain AAU status. The Big Ten will still let Nebraska in because doing otherwise kills the BTCG and the huge amount of money that goes with it.

by Seth9 on Apr 30, 2011 9:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hospital's been in Omaha for 100 years...

Suppose they could have restructured somehow, if only to bolster #‘s, but I’m curious if concrete criteria were put before UNL saying they needed to achieve X to maintain membership. Is there no double secret probation anymore? UNL’s funding grew 2% faster than the rest of the AAU in the past decade, but apparently it wasn’t enough.

by crowe1856 on Apr 30, 2011 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

thanks for all the answers

Penn States medical campus is not at University Park (which is the main campus) however 2 hours away at Hershey. However, the Medical school, along with the Penn College of Technology (a 2 years school essentially and located 90 mins from UP) budgets all fall under the University Park budget. Which makes sense to me now b/c of the AAU. So it didn’t make sense to me that UNL wouldn’t have done the same thing.

"They say in Happy Valley that if God wasn’t a Penn State fan, why is the sky blue and white?" Fortt said. "Who am I to argue with God?"

by amandakt on Apr 30, 2011 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's not unique.

Both the University of Illinois and Wisconsin systems have their major med programs in their state’s largest cites (UIC & UWM, respectively). Omaha, being Nebraska’s largest city, makes the med program accessible to the largest number of people.

Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.

by Kyle McCann't on May 1, 2011 12:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

it's more the fact that its not tied in with their main campus

that I was questioning. See my note above. Penn State Medical may be a different campus but for budgetary purposes, it’s the same school essentially. Seems that would be the smartest thing for UNL to do is get UNO under the same umbrella.

"They say in Happy Valley that if God wasn’t a Penn State fan, why is the sky blue and white?" Fortt said. "Who am I to argue with God?"

by amandakt on May 1, 2011 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think it has to do with its location in Omaha

I have a couple family members that are current and past employees/faculty members in the UN system. There seems to be a bit of hostility between the UNO and UNL administrations anytime one campus treads onto the other’s turf.

One somewhat recent issue was the Peter Kiewit Institute which is physically on the UNO campus, but is part of the UNL College of Engineering because UNL didn’t want UNO starting their own Engineering program. If I remember correctly, there was also a big uproar by UNL when UNO built its first on campus housing.

I think this might be a reason the Med School is its own separate entity withing the UN system.

by powercat62 on May 1, 2011 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Something really doesn't smell right, here.

I sense ulterior motives. But you’d think that if the oust was because of the Big Ten move that most, if not all of the old Big 12 schools would’ve voted against UNL…

by FDLink on Apr 30, 2011 10:42 AM CDT reply actions  

I Sense The Evil Hoof Of BEVO At Work

From the Omaha World-Herald:

However, the AAU’s membership review committee — headed by Larry R. Faulkner, president emeritus of the University of Texas at Austin — found that even if UNL research continued to grow at the same rate for another decade, it would still remain at the bottom of the AAU.

But all the other Big XII schools (Texas included) voted AGAINST kicking Nebraska out? Two words: PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.

Jon Johnston, as I ranted two years ago, I don’t do coincidences.

Paddle faster, I hear banjos!!

by Section 37 on Apr 30, 2011 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

The problem isn't who the qoute is from

but what the quote says…

This isn’t a grand Texas conspiracy and in many ways you should be very happy that someone from the UT system was the chair instead of someone from the Ivy league schools that would have been much less accepting of the problems associated with being a large land grant school.

Lets not forget that there is also rumblings in the same regard about A&M and the AAU. It is in Bevo’s best interest to see Neb remain an AAU school just so their conference mates A&M can maintain the same standing. This sucks that it happened, but trying to insinuate that Bevo is behind all of this is childish.

JD’s like, "you want some f*&#ing pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, b*#&hes!"- RCCook

LSB: "Oh s#*t, JD. You crazy!"

by laxtonto on Apr 30, 2011 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not A Grand Texas Conspiracy You Say?

I will believe that the same day I believe:

A: JFK was shot by a lone gunman
B: We won the war in Vietnam
C: Nixon was “not a crook.”
D: Reagan didn’t trade arms for hostages
E: George W. Bush’s command of the English language is downright Shakespearian.
F: Bill Clinton and Monica were “just friends.”
G: That is Barak Obama’s real birth certificate.
H: That’s Donald Trump’s real hair.
I: Sarah Palin is a member of MENSA.
J: This list is on a par with the David Letterman Top 10.

It is in Bevo’s best interest to see Neb remain an AAU school

The only thing in BEVO’s best interest is BEVO. Proof? Look at the $300 million money trail leading all the way to Bristol, CT. The most self-absorbed school not named Notre Dame.

Paddle faster, I hear banjos!!

by Section 37 on Apr 30, 2011 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

This is gold.

Innovators look at the same thing as everyone else, yet see something different.

by K. Scott Bailey on May 1, 2011 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

From his previous post,

pretty sure serious.

Innovators look at the same thing as everyone else, yet see something different.

by K. Scott Bailey on May 1, 2011 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

First school ever to be voted out...?

I’d say that makes us a groundbreaking research university!

by crowe1856 on Apr 30, 2011 11:36 AM CDT reply actions  

If this doesn't affect our CIC membership

we will be fine long-term.

But for the rest of my time on this planet, I think we can kiss the AAU group good-bye for the next 60 or so years. There are many schools that trump Neb. research $$$$ that are not in the group, like Georgia, that Neb would fall behind.

Damn, right when everything seemed like it was going well, new research park, Big Ten membership, endowment increases, then this happens. You want to know why learning math and the hard sciences are important for kids today, there you go.

Engineering wouldn't be so bad if occam's razor worked.

by meatybob on Apr 30, 2011 2:48 PM CDT reply actions  

"You want to know why learning math and the hard sciences are important for kids today, there you go."

Brother, truer words were never spoken. The current manufactured culture of anti-intellectualism is going to kill America.

While folks rant against “elitist snobbery” India and China are cranking out engineers and scientists by the tens of thousands. You know, like WE used to do, when WE made things, invented things, and led the world in innovation. Now, aspiring to be “elite” is bad, and so all we are good at is buying crap that we used to make.

by UltimaRatioRegum on Apr 30, 2011 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Here is Perlman's letter

Sounds like not only does UNL ag research not count, but actually hurts a school like Nebraska in that the ag school faculty are basically deadweight.

Engineering wouldn't be so bad if occam's razor worked.

by meatybob on Apr 30, 2011 2:59 PM CDT reply actions  

it isn't that it is Ag research specifically

but the manner in which the funding is given out in many Ag feilds.

The AAU discounts funding that is not given out in a competitive environment. This theoretically should help schools like Neb by prohibiting universities with a heavy alumni base from increasing their funding numbers by simply giving all of their research grants to their Alma mater. The problem is that the USDA research funds do not meet the AAU criteria for funding due to how the research is distributed.

The real problem is the the USDA research is considered deadweight and the allocation of faculty towards the USDA research keeps them from other research opportunities. The question should really lie not in the lack of funding but in the direction of research of the university. It was know 10 years ago, when this almost happened in 2000, that the manner in which research opportunities where selected initially was a problem. By continuing to focus on USDA research and other forms of non-competitively allocated Ag research funding and not competitively allocated Ag research the overall numbers continued to skew.

There is no one to blame but the university in all of this. The criteria has not changed in the last 10 years. Your biggest culprit most likely is the faculty. We are seeing the back end of the baby boomers beginning to reach the retirement stage as faculty. What that tends to mean is that they are not actively searching for new fields and most are maintaining long term projects (which tend to be a staple in agricultural research) that are being wound down to coincide with their retirement. With a heavy allotment of faculty already invested into the USDA research there is little incentive the last 10 years for them to move to other areas instead of riding out the end of their long term studies.

JD’s like, "you want some f*&#ing pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, b*#&hes!"- RCCook

LSB: "Oh s#*t, JD. You crazy!"

by laxtonto on Apr 30, 2011 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ag school faculty are deadweight

for they are normalized toward the research $$$$ that the AAU doesn’t count. Simply put, what the AAU does is take the research $$$$ and divided that by tenure and tenure track faculty. For a school like Rice, it basically takes their research $$$ and divide that by the faculty (assuming it has no Ag school, which I’m pretty sure it doesn’t). For UNL, it takes the non-USDA research $$$$ and divides that amount over all faculty, including the ag school’s. You can see how this will depress the amount.

On questioning how research $$$ is granted, I dunno if I quite buy it. Academics need to make proposals on these sort of things with very specific projects. If NSF grants are won on a particular project, I kinda doubt they can be rerouted toward the Ag school. And visa versa with the USDA money. And per Perlman’s comments, if the AAU wants to neglect the ag school research $$$$, I think he is fine with it, but don’t use them as an aggregate faculty total.

The funny thing is, if UNL spun off the ag school (granted, how? who knows), and if the med school was under the UNL system, none of this would have happened, if you look at the data from the correspondence between Perlman and the AAU.

here is the link for the correspondence between the AAU and Perlman

http://ucommxsrv1.unl.edu/downloadables/pdf/UNLAAU.pdf

it does take forever to load.

Engineering wouldn't be so bad if occam's razor worked.

by meatybob on Apr 30, 2011 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Re: Link

I still think that this kind of information (at least some of it) would have been shared with the other Big Ten presidents just so that they knew what was going on.

In the deed, the glory.
Corn Nation!

by Aaron Musfeldt on Apr 30, 2011 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

here is the link

link

Engineering wouldn't be so bad if occam's razor worked.

by meatybob on Apr 30, 2011 3:00 PM CDT reply actions  

This stuck out to me.
“We have known we were at risk of this for 10 years and successfully fought off a similar threat in 2000,” he said.

The presidents of the Big Ten had to know that Nebraska was near the bottom of the AAU in whatever ranking system(s) they used. If Nebraska had to hold off the vultures once before, then the possibility of them having to do it again was there. No school had been voted out before, but the presidents of the Big Ten Unversities had to know before they invited Nebraska in, that this possibility could have happened.

Also, I don’t think Nebraska will be the last school that ends up getting voted out.

In the deed, the glory.
Corn Nation!

by Aaron Musfeldt on Apr 30, 2011 3:53 PM CDT reply actions  

What really bothers me is the perception issue.

The perception that arises from this (particularly among the haters, who will go to town on ANY bit of dirt they can latch onto— like the petty, jealous cretins over at BOTC) is that UNL was sleeping on the job and got justly fired for it.

In reality, this is akin to getting fired because your socks didn’t match— a matter of semantics and bias. But alas, UNL now has to deal with the perception issue. I’d really like to know how Jim Delaney feels about this, especially since at least one Big Ten school voted against UNL.

by FDLink on Apr 30, 2011 6:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CN needs your tips! Inform us with an email to: cornnation - at - gmail.com. Better yet, join the CN community and create a fanpost or fanshot!

FanPosts

SHOP THE CORN NATION STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Stanford Donor renames Offensive Coordinator Position
More Texa$$ Arrogance
Irish payout to Weis keeps piling up
Call me anal retentive, but this is NOT how Nebraska Baseball should make it to ESPiN. The best...
Building for the B1G. Recent aerial photo of Memorial Stadium expansion and Haymarket arena construction from HuskerMax.com.
Adam Carriker writes NEW blog, "Draft Day" on ProInterviews
Alfonzo Dennard bond set at $5000
Brook Berringer, 16 Years On....RIP, #18.

From our friends at HuskerMax.com.
Athletic Department Announces Two Options for Redeeming Spring Game Tickets
Adam Carriker writes about the Off-Season on Pro Interviews

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

Photo_6_small Jon Johnston

Rc_icon_small Husker Mike

Editors

Hobbes2_small JLew

Bern_hat_small Brian Speers

Mel-gibson-braveheart-photograph-c1010192231_small Billgrip

Sword_011_small Aaron Musfeldt

Rickysmith_small Ricky Smith

Al_bundy_vs_chobot_small Andy Ketterson

Authors

Cornguy_small Cobby

Sb22_small William Grubb

Pelini_small AdamTheTitan