Big Ten and Pac 12 Collaborate - What Does It Mean For Nebraska?
Today, the Big Ten and Pac 12 announced that they are going to start collaborating more on athletic schedules.
With a history of Rose Bowl competition dating back more than a century, the Big Ten Conference and Pac-12 Conference announced today a collaborative effort to enhance long-term scheduling commitments between the two conferences across all sports amongst the 24 institutions.
The new Big Ten-Pac-12 collaboration will feature more games between the two conferences in an effort to enhance the experiences for all student-athletes, fans and alumni while broadening the national scope of both conferences. Details of the new effort will continue to unfold as administrators and conference staff members meet in the coming year.
What does all this mean? Well for the Olympic Sports, you will start to see scheduling changes starting next year. Both conference have (or are starting up) television networks and this will provide a lot of exposure for both conferences on both networks. This is a really fantastic way to "combine" two conferences without actually combining them.
This move really solidifies the PAC-12 and Big Ten conferences as far as expansion goes. There's really no reason to expand at this point. A lot of scheduling holes can be filled (especially for the olympic sports). Basketball is going to get some more marquee games, but what about football? In 2017, when this is suppose to take place, the Big Ten is suppose to move to a 9-game conference schedule. This would create a situation where some years certain schools with out-of-conference rivalry games would only have 6 home games. Seven is suppose to be the magic number for athletic department revenue goals.
In football, the objective is to create an annual 12 inter-conference game schedule between the two conferences by the 2017 season. The plan calls for each school to play an opponent from the other conference every year with some flexibility built into the process to respect existing post-2017 FBS non-conference match-ups. Additionally, more inter-conference games are expected to appear sooner based on schedule openings. Many sports, including men’s and women’s basketball, could see an increased level of inter-conference competition in the near term, possibly as early as the 2012-13 academic year. Over the coming months there will be a series of detailed scheduling planning meetings among administrators of both conferences to work out exact details.
There were tweets this afternoon about the Big Ten doing away with the 9-game conference schedule this afternoon, but nothing was officially stated on this. Jim Delaney is going on the BTN tonight at 4pm CST and he may answer this question.
So if we keep the 9-game conference schedule, does this kill any change for a meaningful game with another BCS school during the regular season? If we go back to an 8-game schedule, does this become our "marquee" non-con game every year? I hope not. Hopefully it will be the first step to a better non-conference schedule for the Huskers.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Just when we thought we'd never have to deal with delusional Buff fans again...
This happens. The Colorado “rivalry” isn’t dead after all. I like it.
Look me up on youtube sometime...if you're really bored.
I could live with being paired up with them
It’d depend how they structured it, though. If they made the matchup sort of based on the preseason projections like they do in basketball, then we’d never see them.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
Sooners/Cornhusker Rivalry Renewed?
If the Sooners ever join the Pac, then I can see forward thinkers in the Big-10 and future Pac-14 office renewing this rivalry. It would be an awesome way to cap a Pac-14/Big-10 football challenge.
Unless Sooners join Pac12, this pretty much kills any chance for the 2020 series against OU.
Play for the love of the game. A Cornhusker through feast or famine. That's the Nebraska way.
by Salt Creek and Stadium on Dec 28, 2011 9:46 PM CST via Android app reply actions
honestly
I really could give a shit if we ever play Oklahoma again.
those times are gone, and let them be gone. they were good memories, great games, but it’s over now, and there ain’t nothing going to bring it back.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Follow @cornnation Twitter
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Dec 29, 2011 11:07 AM CST up reply actions
B1G-PAC Shootout?
So if we keep the 9-game conference schedule, does this kill any change for a meaningful game with another BCS school during the regular season?
For all practical purposes… yes. It would be asking for too much of a revenue cut to do otherwise.
If we go back to an 8-game schedule, does this become our “marquee” non-con game every year?
For most programs, no. The PAC game would be opposite another major for 1 home, 1 away gamer yearly.
.
Maintaining nationwide exposure isn’t as valuable as the 7th home game, but it is valuable enough to make the schedule a bit tougher.
I would be surprised if the B1G doesn’t go back to an 8 game conference schedule. This wasn’t favorable for all programs. Delany was looking for better quality games for the BTN. This provides a compromise.
Hopefully this will evolve to something like the B1G-ACC shootout across multiple sports including football. While you can’t elevate the level of performance of all of the participants to increase interest, you can increase interest by changing the context the games are played in.
Proud proponent of the 52 team Uber Conference
Nebraska vs Oregon non-conference game
I like it. Also would not mind giving some payback to USC on what they did to us at home a few years back.

by 
























