Report Card: Huskers 49, Western Kentucky 10
Each week at CornNation, I grade the performance of the Huskers by position. At times, I've been known as a contrarian when it comes to Nebraska football. Sometimes right, sometimes wrong. But judging from what others have written and said, it looks like this week is going to be one of those contrarian weeks.
Like nearly every Husker fan, I was truly excited by the start of the game. I mean, how could you not? But as we got into the second quarter, the euphoria wore off as the offense and defense both started to languish. At halftime, I definitely wasn't impressed with the overall performance of the Big Red. In the second half, the offense played a little better, but the defense played a little worse. It's easy to dismiss these concerns in a 49-10 victory, but I'm looking at it in perspective. Western Kentucky has now lost 21 straight games, and on my report card, a 39 point victory over the Hilltoppers isn't worth more than a 33 point victory over Arizona.
As always, your opinions are always welcome in the comments.
QB: What can I add about Taylor Martinez running the ball that hasn't already been said? We haven't seen that kind of game-breaking ability at the quarterback position since Eric Crouch. But let's remember the opponent: Western Kentucky, who has lost 21 straight games and has never defeated a 1-A school. And while Martinez looked good throwing the ball on short routes, he looked lost throwing the ball on medium routes. In the second quarter, three straight drives resulted in punts, and in the third quarter, he threw an out pass to Niles Paul that most any Big XII defense would intercept and score easily on. So I'm not jumping on the bandwagon just yet. Especially when Cody Green put up a much more consistent performance. Since it's Martinez's first action as a college athlete, you've got to like the potential Martinez offers. Grade: B-RB: The game plan didn't provide the backs a lot of opportunities. Roy Helu would not be denied on his touchdown run, and Rex Burkhead looked good running and catching the ball. Dontrayevous Robinson was fairly ineffective on his four carries, but Austin Jones showed some impressive speed on his touchdown run. (It was nice to see how happy his teammates were afterwards.) Grade: B+
WR: Brandon Kinnie showed great hands on a couple of Martinez's less accurate tosses. Niles Paul continued his play from last season: a great catch and some nifty punt returns on the positive side. On the negative side, a fumble and a dropped pass (that he at least tried to recover, just in case.) Grade: B
OL: With an overmatched opponent, it was tough for me to really evaluate their play too much. What I liked was seeing the depth on the line and having to double check just who all was in the game and where. Jermarcus Hardrick seemed to take the most snaps at left tackle, but I did catch Jeremiah Sirles late in the game at right tackle. I wonder if that's going to be something we'll see a lot more of later this season. All in all, considering that Nebraska just had six linemen available last November, it's a refreshing development. Grade: B
DL: Generally speaking, I liked what Baker Steinkuhler did up the middle, and I thought Jared Crick got a little penetration. But the ends didn't make much of an impact, especially after Cameron Meredith left the game. Grade: C+
LB: Lavonte David seemed to be all over the place, trying to make plays even if he wasn't always in the right spot. Alonzo Whaley also flew around the field, but sometimes seemed to be out of position. I wouldn't be surprised if Mathew May or Eric Martin see more time this week, especially when coaches look at how Bobby Rainey got free so many times. Grade: B-
Secondary: Quiet night for this bunch. I was somewhat surprised to see Rickey Thenarse get the start at safety. Dejon Gomes made sense to get the start at the other safety spot; he's too good of a player to keep on the bench until it's time to go to a dime defense. See his strip of Rainey at the goal line; we've seen that before at Kansas last season. Grade: C+
Overall Grade: B- I saw a some very good things at times, but way too many plays that weren't so good or even downright bad. That could be expected for a first game, but this game should have gotten out of hand much earlier than it did.
Elsewhere in College Football:
Kansas: F I guess there's no where else to go but up from here, Turner.
Missouri: C- I missed most of the game, and what little I did see looked a lot like Mizzou's bowl game against Navy. If the Zooker can do that to Pinkel, other coaches are going to pay attention.
Oklahoma: D- Utah Frickin' State? For shame.
Ole Miss: F The Rebels shouldn't have been surprised by this one; Jacksonville State challenged Georgia Tech and Florida State last season. But still...
Florida: Offense F, Defense A. 25 yards of offense through 3 quarters?
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great report
I think you are spot on with your report card HM,lots of potential for the offense but I’ll hold off til they play K-state. The D,everybody knows that Bo will be knee deep in their a**es after giving up 299 yards to W.Kentucky. I think Idaho will catch the repercussions of this weeks Hell for the Blackshirts,and I don’t think those boys will make that mistake again.
GBR!
throw dem bones!!!
GBR!
throw dem bones!!!
Some early season stuff
Overall, I’m basically in the same spot I was before this game. My first impressions have been tempered somewhat. At first I was blown away by what I saw on offense and very disappointed with the defense. Then I looked at the stat line from our FAU game last year. Basically on a per play average, we were identical on defense and about half a yard better on offense.
Basically, we know where both units ended up last year, so that should temper too much excitement on the offensive side of the ball, and too much worry on the other one. Is this team going to be a copy of last year? I don’t think so, but our sample size is way too small right now to be of any predictive value.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
Good take.
I agree with most of this. I couldn’t watch, so I had to go find as many highlights as I could to see what we looked like.
From what I saw, Martinez had some good throws in the middle-yardage range so I must not have seen a few that he botched. I saw him throw a dart to the sideline, one of the hardest throws to make. I also don’t think that a QB can be truly evaulated when he is constantly being pulled and re-inserted, screwing with his rhythm. I truly hope that we don’t continue to see this shit from Bo. I mean, pick a guy and go with him…
On WKU being 0-21: This is a new year, and they have a new coach I thought. They played pretty well, so I don’t know that they were as shitty as maybe the last few years. That tailback was tough, and if that 49-10 score had been against KU we maybe wouldn’t be downplaying the strength of our opponent. I think they were much better than people had been saying, and we still destroyed ’em with a 3 QB rotation.
But like I said, it sucks having to hunt down highlights for any evaluating.
For those who are in the same boat…here is the best clip I found. (God I gate how Huskrs.com has half the highlights from field level. )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evjOIHPGoUw&feature=related
"Not the victory but the action; Not the goal but the game;
In the deed the glory"
GO BIG RED!
D-Line concerns
By mid 3rd quarter, our D-Line was getting pushed 5 yards downfield every play. Lack of depth at LB is a concern.
Need a lot of improvement there or the KSU game could be real painful to watch.
I agree
If we can’t figure out a way to stop the run and fast, Daniel Thomas is going to make our defense look like a junior high practice squad. That guy is legit. And later in the season there’s Kendall Hunter, who had a ridiculous game against Washington State. We need more depth at Linebacker…I really think Latravis Washington should be moved back to LB to provide more depth, considering we have plenty at QB now.
I think
For that game, we’ll have to break the mold defensively a bit. Pelini’s schemes have often just relied on the front four to handle the line of scrimmage, which works against most of the spread teams we play. Against K-State we’ll probably have to go with the traditional 9 men in the box look. Make Coffman and his receivers beat Amukamara and Dennard one on one (they can’t).
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
Last year Ark St did something similar to NU's D
Going into the VaTech game many people thought they’d run all over us. Didn’t happen. Adjustments were made, and the defense came together.
I’m slightly concerned and that’s all.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
QB Drama
Martinez looked great, but I know that as soon as we lose a game or he plays bad people are going to start asking for Green or Lee, and then if they don’t do that great we’ll want Martinez back. Looks like it’s going to be another long season of QB drama…
Grades
Giving a B- to a redshirt freshman QB starting in his first collegiate game is a slap in the face. He scores three TD, shows brilliant speed and pocket awareness, and bonus points; he manages to deliver several strikes, two which should have been caught that would have extended drives. B- !!!
As for the D, I too was disappointed with the effort, but I’ll wait to see them in game two before I get too concerned. LBs will have all week to get the head part of the game under control. Both are tremendous athletes and will have the team in the right defensive formations for the Vandals aerial assault. GBR!
I didn't see that pocket awareness...
…in fact, I saw him take an unnecessary sack. He threw some nice short darts, but some of his longer throws weren’t very good. And some of his short throws required some great catches by Kinnie.
A B- is still an above average grade, and pretty darn good for a kid who was starting the season as a redshirt freshman.
I thought
Martinez looked pretty good. I would bet that the leash will get pretty short if he can’t pass the ball deep. You have to have that threat in conference play lets face it Western Kentucky should make every starting QB from a top ten team look like a future pro. I am with Pelini, I was expecting a totally dominating defensive performance and was dissappointed in what I saw. Jarod and Baker didn’t look as dominating as they should have. Linebackers were thrown into the fire a little bit and played about as well as you can expect in that situation. Just overall I wasn’t impressed, spoiled from last year I suppose. But hey, they set the standard not me!!!!
























