Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Troubled Yankees Join Troubled Red Sox In Last Place

Report Card: Nebraska 17, South Dakota State 3

Bo Pelini was not pleased by the Huskers performance against South Dakota State. (Photo by Eric Francis/Getty Images)

Not since the end of the Bill Callahan clusterfool has there been a weekly report card like this. Sure, the Huskers had their clunkers here and there, but nothing quite like this. Some would argue that since Nebraska won, you can't grade them poorly. But then by that same logic, you can't grade the Huskers well when they play well, but come up a little short on the scoreboard against upper-tier competition. Another argument could be made that this might be the only week Nebraska could put forth this effort and still come away with the win, but I belive the lack of respect for the opponent (by both players and fans) was a root cause of the outcome.

So this one isn't pretty. Every team will cough up a hairball or two each season when they don't play their best. Husker fans should hope that this week was exactly that. I think we've seen that this team is capable of much more than we saw against South Dakota State. As always, your feedback is always welcome. If you aren't yet a member of CornNation, please sign up (it's free!) and join the conversation.

Star-divide

QB Everybody got really excited by Taylor Martinez's performance the week before against Washington. Some took it a little too far; in fact, some anonymous internet goof decided to create a Twitter account to campaign for him for the Heisman Trophy, using that ridiculous (for a freshman) nickname.  And it appears that Martinez might have bought in a little too much into the hype.  A fumble on the opening play of the game, followed by two interceptions where he stared at his receiver and ignored the horde of defensive backs who followed his eyes.  They were simply U-G-L-Y.  The second one earned him a spot on the bench for the rest of the game. Cody Green came in, and while he didn't turn the ball over, he failed to connect with wide open receivers.  (Especially Brandon Kinnie, who probably could have ran all the way to Kansas City untouched.) If this had been any other opponent, I think we might have seen Zac Lee enter the game.  Grade: F

RB: Roy Helu and Rex Burkhead seemed to do the best they could do under the circumstances. When backs need to break tackles before they get out of the backfield, you know the primary problem is elsewhere. Still, the coaches felt they could have made better decisions yesterday.  Grade: C+

WR: This one is a toughie. Mike McNeill and Kyler Reed had nice long catches, and Brandon Kinnie is becoming the new go-to receiver.  But Tim Marlowe and Niles Paul had several miscues. And on more than one occasion, a missed block on the perimeter kept the running backs from gaining positive yardage. I think Ted Gilmore got fed up with the mistakes and freely substituted to find someone -- anyone -- who could step forward and not screw up.  I'm not sure he found anybody.  Grade: D+

OL: You'd think that Nebraska's offensive line could simply lean on and impose their will on the 1-AA Jackrabbits. Think again. At various times, I watched both Jermarcus Hardrick and Jeremiah Siriles get beaten badly.  Grade: D

DL: Throughout the game, I was most disappointed in the performance of the defensive line. They seemed to get pushed around quite a bit. But then in the postgame interviews, Bo Pelini mentioned the defensive line played ok, but it was the linebackers that were the problem. Well, he knows better than me...so I'm giving them a C.

LB: Lavonte David racked up 19 tackles...good right? Well, Pelini indicated that he wasn't always in the right place or making the right play. That comment really illustrated to me the problem with the defense.  With Will Compton still out with a broken foot, Pelini doesn't trust the linebackers. He's always looking to move Dejon Gomes up and go with a dime package, but there's a huge problem with that. Nebraska's dime package is vulnerable to the run.  You saw it last November with Tobren Opurum of Kansas, and this season with Western Kentucky's Bobby Rainey and Washington's Chris Polk. The solution is to only go to the dime in obvious passing situations, but time and time again, Pelini chooses to go dime.  Why? He's simply not comfortable with the linebacker play in the base peso defense, except when he knows that the offense will run the ball.  And against South Dakota State, he chose to go even more with dime coverage after Eric Martin left the game.  So how should I grade this?  Well, I'm going with a D-.

Secondary: Other than not being able to stop the run in the dime, the secondary played ok. Alfonzo Dennard came up with a big interception at the goal line to thwart one of the Jackrabbits' drives. P.J. Smith added an interception on fourth down that he would have been better off dropping. Grade: C

Overall:  It was a win...but against a 1-AA team, Nebraska should have been capable of doing so much more than they did. It's a win, but an ugly win that grades out at a D.

Elsewhere in College Football


Texas  F  A month into the season, and you still don't really know what your offense does well. The Longhorns had hoped to be able to run the ball...and can't. Meanwhile, Skippy and the Bruins came in and blew you out on your home field.

Oklahoma D+  Not sure how good Cincinatti is, but I don't think this was "Good Oklahoma"...but it wasn't exactly "Bad Oklahoma"

Kansas State C- Their game against Central Florida was delayed an hour and a half by a severe thunderstorm.  But their offense decided to wait an extra hour and a half just to make sure it was safe.

Missouri  A  Last week, it took until the final minute to seize the game from San Diego State. Against Miami of Ohio, it took Carl Gettis eight seconds to put the Tigers up and in control.  (Hmm.... maybe Big XII teams should swear off scheduling teams with the initials SDSU...)

Athletic Directors F  If someone told you that you needed to skip one weekend of the football season for some reason (work, family, whatever)...this was the weekend to skip. The only really compelling matchup was Alabama vs. Arkansas, and the number of relatively interesting games was even shorter. With television networks seeming to have more and more control over college football, it won't be long before the networks start pushing schools to stagger their body bag games so that there are a few more choices of game to televise.

Poll
Rate the Huskers performance against South Dakota State
A Just win baby!
46 votes
B Huskers showed great moxie when things didn't go write.
11 votes
C Pretty much an average performance
55 votes
D Huskers didn't lose, so they didn't fail
404 votes
F It was South eFFin Dakota State!
512 votes

1028 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I gave us an F

Simply because this effort would have given us a double digit loss against any other team from the Big 12. For every reason that has been already mentioned, just bad.

The Big 12 is bad this year. I don’t feel like I’m exaggerating, the Big 12 is BAD (kind of appropriate when you think about it). Considering the athletes we have, we really should run the table in the regular season. But teams will play hard against us, and we need to show up 8 times in a row to pull it off. Can Pelini and his staff pull that off?

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Sep 27, 2010 12:16 AM CDT reply actions  

You are confused me.

You say we would have lost by double digits to a Big 12 team, and then said that the Big 12 is bad this year. So maybe not.

by Steve Brief on Sep 27, 2010 7:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think it's that confusing

No one looks like a world beater in the Big 12, but an effort as bad as Saturday’s would give us an L.

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Sep 27, 2010 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just curious
Considering the athletes we have, we really should run the table in the regular season.

I am biased and all, but do you really think Nebraska’s athletic advantage is the difference this year? I reckon that Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma, and possibly Oklahoma State can lay claim to being at least as “athletic” as Nebraska, if not more so. (By athletic, I mean depth cross the board as well as top performers)

Now, if you want to say that Pellini’s defensive coaching and the experience of the Huskers under his leadership will make the difference, I might buy it (I continue to believe Nebraska is the favorite to win the North, mainly because of their home schedule). But I do not see any clear athletic edge for Nebraska over the other top half of the conference.

by MU'97 on Sep 27, 2010 8:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

On athletic ability alone, Nebraska can’t even touch Texas or Oklahoma. The Huskers are a team of 3- and 4-star players, while those two teams are made up of 4- and 5-star players.

Bash the recruiting ratings all you want, but that’s still a big difference.

by Cheeseandcorn on Sep 27, 2010 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Eh you got me

Very bad choice of words on my part. Basically what I was trying to get at is that Nebraska has always won, whether it be under Osborne or Pelini, by taking those “3 stars” and in some cases, doing more with them than a Texas can do with a 5 star. So no, in terms of pure athletic ability, NU isn’t all that special by Big 12 standards. The reference to our “athletes” refers to us essentially having playmakers everywhere (both sides of the ball) for the first time in a very, very long time.

What is different this year is that we are not handicapped by having significantly less raw talent than the teams we are playing, and that’s saying something. Solich ran the program into the ground talent wise, Callahan was a good recruiter but didn’t develop what he got. Pelini’s seemingly managed to combine recruiting and development, and I don’t think there’s much doubt that 2010 is his best team yet.

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Sep 27, 2010 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

US? An F?

Hey, here we go again with that WE stuff. How did you grade in films yesterday? I though you missed a few blocks also but I wouldn’t grade your performance an F. You did hustle and you looked very motivated and you did make sure the first team had their water bottles for timeouts.

US? US? Are you kidding me? What the hell is this US crap? It’s “THEY” man. You had nothing to do with it( althought you might have because they looked pretty crappy).

by anti-husker on Sep 27, 2010 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

But when the crappy games are "us"

The good games can also be “us” and then feel better.

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Sep 27, 2010 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

nope

there’s no us. it is they until u suit up

by anti-husker on Sep 27, 2010 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Special Teams?

I couldn’t watch, but the punting sounded good. Couldn’t see the coverage on kicks. Didn’t Kunalic put one out of bounds again too? After the B12 CG, I do not want to ever see him do that again.

So what’s the grade?

by Steve Brief on Sep 27, 2010 7:08 AM CDT reply actions  

PUNTING?

You are talking about PUNTING? What you should talk about is how the ref that through that illegal block flag on the pick had $500 on the game. Are you kidding?

by anti-husker on Sep 27, 2010 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Punting and kicking was good,

but the coverage wasn’t all that great. I saw quite a few missed tackles.

by Omaha Sun on Sep 27, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here's what I'm worried about coming out of the game Saturday

1) The passing offense. From what we’ve seen so far, Taylor Martinez is not good at throwing the football. He’s not even OK. He’s somewhere between mediocre and terrible. If he can’t quickly turn into a credible passer, good teams are going to figure out how to stop Nebraska pretty easily.

2) The offensive line. Yeah, Martinez didn’t make great decisions on the zone read and Watson’s play-calling left quite a bit to be desired, but the core problem was that almost every time a Husker back took the ball, he was met by a Jackrabbit within about two yards. That’s a clear sign of poor blocking more than anything else – against an undersized, not terribly talented defensive front.

3) Run defense. Duh. Unless something significantly changes in the next week and a half, Daniel Thomas is going to run wild on the Huskers.

Here’s what I’m not worried about:

1) The running backs. As I said earlier, Helu and Burkhead (and Martinez, too, in large part) had zero room to run. I didn’t see a lack of vision for cutbacks, and I did see a lot of fight for extra yards in those two guys.

2) Playcalling. At least I think so. Watson got thoroughly outcoached on Saturday, but I really don’t see that happening again next week. I don’t have a lot of trust in Watson, but he’s simply got too many offensive weapons to screw things up game after game.

3) Wide receivers. We saw a heck of a lot of brain farts in this game, but we also saw a unit that would have looked pretty good if it had a quarterback that could just throw a ball 15 yards with accuracy. We had a lot of wide, wide open receivers. Their blocking will come around, too – it was phenomenal against Washington.

by Cheeseandcorn on Sep 27, 2010 9:12 AM CDT reply actions  

Whoa

Let’s peek a bit into this shall we?

1) Um, last week he was freaking T-SOMETHING OR OTHER and he was the most exciting football player in the country. As for figuring out the kid…..DING, DING, DING you got it. just ask the SDSU staff

2) How do you know they aren’t terribly talented? Follow much Jack football do you?

3) Again, DING, DING, DING……What do we have for him Charlie?

4) You better. You better look at the rankings of the teams you played and how NONE, not a one can or will stop the run.

    - can’t rank SDSU because they ARE 1AA

   - WKU 117th in points allowed.
   - Idaho 51st in points allowed and they haven’t played any offensive juggernauts
   - and here’s your signature win this year….WASHINGTON….104th in points allowed…and 67th in points scored….wow!

Man I can’t even continue, it’s so funny

by anti-husker on Sep 27, 2010 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

You give a fan an “us, we” lessen in a post and then go on later to post about “your” win. You are a troll. Why don’t you bring something new to the table? Your posts are boring.

by JimmytheRed on Sep 27, 2010 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you're being a bit pessimistic

1. No, Martinez is not going to be tearing people apart anytime soon. But I’m confident that Saturday was an anomaly. Keep in mind before that, he was completing 65% of his passes. Has he shown the ability to hit the deep ball? No. But he’s shown the ability to consistently hit short and medium range routes, at least until yesterday. But I think it’s obvious he had a bad day, and that performance won’t be typical. With that said, if he can’t progress in the passing game and stretch the field, our running backs are good enough alone, I think it might be Zac Lee time.

2. The offensive line is a concern—when we play good defenses. Unless people are going to line up to tell me that UW is much, much worse than SDSU, what we have is a game where the offensive line (and the whole team) just didn’t show up. It happens. If we fail to crack 250 yards rushing down in Manhattan, then I think we might have a problem.

3. I think this problem is a combination of scheme and inexperience at linebacker. There’s no shame in giving up 4 yards a carry out of a dime formation. Our linebackers will improve. And Daniel Thomas won’t run wild. Kansas State has the weakest passing game of anyone we’ll face this year, so we should be able to crowd the line and trust Amukamara and Dennard to shut down their receivers 1 on 1.

I agree on all of your not concerns except with the receivers, more specifically, Niles Paul. He’s one of our homerun threats, and his mental lapses are holding us back. He’s a great athlete, but he’s just not there mentally yet and that needs to change.

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Sep 27, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

On #3

I’m assuming the Pelinis are smart enough to play K-State that way. (I know I’d trust Amukamara and Dennard enough to leave them one-on-one on K-State’s wideouts.) And if they do have eight in the box and some decent play from the LBs, that should be enough to keep Thomas under 150 or so, which should be enough to win. There’s the glass-half-full take, I guess.

As for Martinez’s passing, I’ll still have to disagree with you. Martinez’s game on Saturday may have been particularly bad, but in terms of the type of passing mistakes he’s making, it was hardly an anomaly. IIRC, he’s short-armed throws to wide-open receivers in every single game so far, the worst being the throw to McNeill in the Washington game. I think he can be a good passing QB down the road, but he just hasn’t shown anything resembling Big 12-level accuracy or strength yet.

by Cheeseandcorn on Sep 27, 2010 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh we've certainly seen those mistakes before

Up to this moment, Martinez has had moments where he’s really good passing, and other moments where he was just dreadful. SDSU was the first game where he was consistently BAD though.

I think the SDSU game proved two things about him.

1. Reinforced what we already knew: he’s not an elite passer
2. Revealed that he’s a freshman and things can and will snowball on him.

I think #2 is the main culprit for why he looked so bad on Saturday.

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Sep 27, 2010 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with JD.

Martinez has shown to be at the very least a competent passer. He’s certainly much improved since the spring game. He misses a pass now and then, but overall he makes good decisions and gets the ball to his receivers. Saturday was the first time I really saw him lock on his receivers, and it didn’t end well.

That was just a really bad game for everyone.

by Omaha Sun on Sep 27, 2010 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Time to drop the ban hammer?

Mike & Jon – if you go to anti-husker’s profile you’ll see that he’s a fan of no one and is only signed up for Corn Nation. I’ve got no problem with fans of opposing programs stepping in to talk a little smack, but this clown is an out and out troll. I know I’m not the only one who’s tired of ignoring him.

"...when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to."
— Martin Luther

by Go Big Rev on Sep 27, 2010 12:40 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Word

It’s not even that he’s a trol it’s that he’s a boring troll.

by SeanH on Sep 27, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jon is on it.

It’s been warned that only coming here to antagonize people won’t be tolerated.

It’s funny that the haters can’t even wait until NU loses to come and troll us, now it’s poorly played wins. What’s next, coming here if NU doesn’t have a shut out or doesn’t score 70+?

Just ignore them, you can’t reason with bizzaro troll logic, they just want attention that they are missing in their sad lives.

Oh and I called it out for having a sock account already. (Sock account is a fake account used for trolling).

You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation

by JLew on Sep 27, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Things to remember, IMO

1) SDSU came to play the game of their lives, and they did. Nebraska came in expecting to win by a lot, and no matter what the players said, you have to know that in the back of their minds the fact that they were playing a “lesser” opponent was there to some degree.

2) Someone forgot to tell Taylor Martinez that this was the game he was supposed to have on the road against Washington, not at home against SDSU. I still think he’s an extremely talented QB and he has the “it” factor that is going to make him great, but he’s still a freshman, and he’s bound to have some flat games. That’s why no freshman has ever wont he heisman, and probably never will.

3) Better to have this game now rather than later. This was a horrible performance by the Huskers but it was against a team that couldn’t beat them on their best day. Last year when Nebraska placed Va. Tech really close and then beat Missouri, the feeling was Nebraska was going to dominate the north and walk into the Big 12 championship easily. Then they were humbled at home in back to back games against Texas Tech and Iowa State. At some point in the season, most great teams have a wake-up call, even national champions usually have a scare or two (see 97’ Huskers at Missouri). At least the Huskers had a scare and still walked out with a W and kept the high ranking.

I think the players, coaches, and fans were brought back down to earth by this and if they can recover well this will be a good thing for a team that I still believe could line up and beat anyone in the country if they play to their potential. GBR, go beat K-State!

by Billgrip on Sep 27, 2010 2:46 PM CDT reply actions  

it's my fault...

….i went to an open-bar wedding reception instead of watching the game on PPV at the bar in Houston. but all the groomsmen were UT grads so none of us had much to gloat about….except the free drinks of course.

by DRJHoustonHusker on Sep 27, 2010 4:37 PM CDT reply actions  

Ok, come off the ledge...

1). Daniel Thomas will not “run all over” this defense. The coaching is too good and they have 10 days of practice to figure out how to stop him. More importantly, on that point, is that K-State will be playing from behind, a la Washington, forcing them to make more plays through the air.

2). Martinez throws a beautiful ball. The nose is down so as to not let it sail or miss trajectory, problem is, he’s not polished enough to get the elevation he needs on it to complete passes consistently (he throws off his back foot a lot).

3). Nebraska may have the most athletic secondary in the country. Athlete-wise, the entire team is on par with any school in the conference. Dobson has the uncanny ability of taking 2-3-4* athletes and turning them into 4-5* athletes, it’s what he does (see: Ndamukong Suh, Philip Dillard, Ricky Thenarse, Roy Helu, Brandon Kinnie, etc.) Not one of those players was 1/3 of the athlete they are now.

@GochFaceKiller on Twitter

by Screwface on Sep 27, 2010 9:59 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Um

they both have a bi(HA) week. Can you do me a favor, since you can see in the future can you tell me what Telefonos De Mexico’s stock will do over the next 6 months. I am looking at PUT options because of there is no need for phones in Mexico any longer.

- Beautiful? Um, ya sure bout that? Looks a little ducky to me. It is nose down though, in the ground.

Secondary? They better be because there is going to be a need for 3rd level tackles against KSU

by anti-husker on Sep 28, 2010 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

This may have been the suckiest week of football I've ever experienced.

First Nebraska lays a giant egg, then the Packers go and lay an even bigger one (you have to be TRYING to get 17 penalties!).

by Omaha Sun on Sep 28, 2010 2:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CN needs your tips! Inform us with an email to: cornnation - at - gmail.com. Better yet, join the CN community and create a fanpost or fanshot!

FanPosts

SHOP THE CORN NATION STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Stanford Donor renames Offensive Coordinator Position
More Texa$$ Arrogance
Irish payout to Weis keeps piling up
Call me anal retentive, but this is NOT how Nebraska Baseball should make it to ESPiN. The best...
Building for the B1G. Recent aerial photo of Memorial Stadium expansion and Haymarket arena construction from HuskerMax.com.
Adam Carriker writes NEW blog, "Draft Day" on ProInterviews
Alfonzo Dennard bond set at $5000
Brook Berringer, 16 Years On....RIP, #18.

From our friends at HuskerMax.com.
Athletic Department Announces Two Options for Redeeming Spring Game Tickets
Adam Carriker writes about the Off-Season on Pro Interviews

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

Photo_6_small Jon Johnston

Rc_icon_small Husker Mike

Editors

Hobbes2_small JLew

Bern_hat_small Brian Speers

Mel-gibson-braveheart-photograph-c1010192231_small Billgrip

Sword_011_small Aaron Musfeldt

Rickysmith_small Ricky Smith

Al_bundy_vs_chobot_small Andy Ketterson

Authors

Cornguy_small Cobby

Sb22_small William Grubb

Pelini_small AdamTheTitan