Big Ten's Nine-Game Conference Schedule: Good News, Bad News
I had the chance to catch most of the Big Ten Media Days coverage on the Big Ten Network, and I must say - it was impressive. Consider the idea that the Big 12 media days took place over three days while the Big Ten finished their Q&A sessions in a single day, without any media problems. Nice job.
Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany stated that he'd like to see a nine-game conference schedule (although not until 2013 in order to honor existing schedules and avoid having to buy out contracts), and that a championship game will be played in 2011.
News about a championship game isn't shocking, but a nine-game conference schedule? That would mean the elimination of one non-conference opponent, which also means the elimination of a guaranteed home game for every team (and a guaranteed win for every coach). It would give the Big Ten a chance to designate a rival or two across divisions, but let's be honest - this doesn't concern Husker fans so much does it?
No doubt there'll be some hand-wringing going on about losing money from a home game, but it's just hand-wringing, nothing more. The increased payout by joining the Big Ten will more than make up for it (and subsequent increases as the network grows and ad revenues increase). Coaches will be against it, obviously. They want that tune-up game against Youngstown State, Rice, or Sun Belt opponent. Can't blame them too much - the pressure to win is heavier than ever at the same time it's becoming more difficult for lesser-privileged programs.
The good news - one more guaranteed quality football game a season (snicker if you want, but Nebraska vs Indiana is still a better game than Nebraska vs Western Kentucky). More television coverage - you know the Big Ten Network will cover conference games.
The bad news - less quality non-conference games. If coaches are forced to play another high-quality opponent in conference, they're sure as hell not going to schedule a high-quality non-conference opponent. Think of it as the way the SEC has operated for years, except they only play eight conference games. It would be even worse news for the polls, as it will make it even more difficult to determine the strength of highly-ranked teams.
It'll be interesting to watch what happens with scheduling in the next two-to-three years. Things could well swing the opposite direction where there are more high-quality games due to increasing payouts for body bag games and more pressure from television to deliver on high-priced contracts.
Things could sway further that direction if the BCS would put a heavier emphasis on strength of schedule. I wouldn't hold my breath on that, though, the BCS seems to be content with the status quo.
I am going off the grid for the next few days, taking a trip to the BWCA. BWCA - that's the Boundary Waters Canoe Area in northern Minnesota for you non-wilderness types. Never been there, but always wanted to go so I am really looking forward to it. No internet, no cell phone, and plenty of fishing. Hurray for me!
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Even non-con games that involve a Big Ten team are on the BTN. In fact thats usually the only place they are unless it’s a legit OOC matchup.
I just don’t see this flying. You have OSU, PSU and UM with insanely big stadiums, making $4-$5 per home game, and I don’t think they can afford to give that up considering their current spending levels. They are all self funded, so there is NO chance that they are able to swing a full AD budget with 7 and possibly 6 home games a year.
Thanks for the article
You are exactly right. Those teams serious about a run at the NC can ill afford a loss. The Big 10 will do exactly what the SEC has done for years. If or when that nineth OOC game is scheduled, you can rest assured it will be a cupcake. And if anyone thinks this isn’t true, check out the OOC teams that SEC teams have on their schedules. The players on some of those teams, I’m told, double up as band members. Of course there is always the outside chance that an App St will bring an upset. But it was only Michigan so know one was surprised. They’ve been playing over their heads for years anyway.
Nebraska is going to need 7 home games every season...
…so if the Big Ten goes to a 9 game conference schedule, that leaves only 1 “home and home” opportunity for non-conference games, with two “body bag” games.
Sorry…but I just don’t see Nebraska dropping back to six home games those years they have to play 5 non-conference games on the road. Just not going to happen.
then
maybe get used to the idea that we’ll start losing the vote in another conference……
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Aug 4, 2010 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions
After the last 8 years
I’d rather see a big dogfight in our division and lots of non-official respect for the Nebraska program even if it means longer odds getting to the BCS champs. Look at Florida this past year; they absolutely destroyed Cincinnati. I’m all for a brutal division race, and I’d rather be the team that barely got ruled out and then slaughtered their opponent in a bowl game than the team that got undue consideration for beating down easy opponents.
Just being in the BIg 10 associates us with the best college football at a time when our program is resurgent. If we lose a home game, big deal.
"Jordan was a ruthless mother******. Jordan was a killer. Jordan didn't care if his teammates despised him." -Bill Simmons
Really not that big a deal
We’ve only had four non-conference games for what? 4 or 5 years? Anyone freaking out about this is making a mountain out of a molehill
The 9 game schedule is clearly for the benefit for the BTN
As a fan, I like it. I am sure the admin are not happy, but that is the price of the switch. And to be honest, it is not losing a home game per year, it is losing one home game every two years.
I was starting to get tired with the 3 cupcakes, one decent team scheduling philosophy anyway. Two years ago, Nebraska didn’t even play a BCS team until October. That was embarrassing. So 2 cupcakes, one decent BCS team for the OOC schedule and 9 BT games, perfect.
I think Osborne has already rejected that model.
If you look over the next few years, we’re seeing Wyoming, Southern Miss, and Fresno State on the schedule along side games against Tennessee, UCLA, and Miami.
Once 2013 happens that is gonna change.
Osborne would have to be crazy fearless to keep a home/home with the 9th game. I’m not a Nebraska fan, so I don’t know him, but that would ballsy beyond belief. If that meant you guys could resume Oklahoma game as a football fan, I hope your right. I’m already psyched about Iowa and Penn State annual events with you guys. May you always beat MU and tOSU. And beat them like Baylor. Very happy to WELCOME you to the Big Ten.
Sun Belt game?
Get with the times, fellas! You’re going to have to tune up against a MAC-rificial lamb, not the Sun Belt. Prepare for Zips, Huskies and Chippewas. Also, regarding the loss of a home game, welcome to the Big Ten. The needs of the many and all… Nebraska went to a conference with a dicator (TX) to a conference that takes a “We are Legion” mentality. While we all know it isn’t really true, Indiana is on equal footing with Ohio State, Michigan and Northwestern are both only 1/12th of the pie, and Nebraska can never dominate Iowa in the board room. It seems odd, but trust me, it’s awesome. Welcome to the Big T(12)en, and Go Bucks!

by 






















