Big 10 Division Updates
Jim Delany and Big 10 AD's have been busy piecing together the divisions for football play. They have also been more vocal with the media this week, too.
First, Penn State's AD Tim Curley reiterates what Jim Delany said on Nebraska Sports nightly on Tuesday.Indiana's AD Fred Glass stressed competitive balance.
Ohio State's AD Gene Smith had the most interesting comments of the three AD's. The biggest being:
But Smith told the Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch in Thursday's editions that the timing of some of the Big Ten's rivalry games might change, and that could include The Game, which traditionally has been the last regular-season game of the season for Michigan and Ohio State
.
"I know one thing for sure, that we're going to play (Michigan every year)," Smith told the Dispatch. "We may end up playing the last game of the year, or not. I just don't know yet."
This leaves the door open for a UM-OSU split and could create a more geographically acceptable split of the 'Big 4" where OSU and PSU are in one divisions and UM and UNL are in the other. Why you may ask? If OSU and UM are in the same division, then they would obviously put that match-up at the end of the season. There is no reason to put it at any other time. If they were in seperate divisions, the general consensus would be that they would not want to see both teams end up playing two weeks in a row. If "the game" was moved to October or early November, then a rematch one month later would be more appealing.
Another thing that was stressed in these articles is that a direct East/West split seems very unlikely. It comes down to whether or not OSU and UM want to be in the same division or not. After that, things should fall into place fairly quickly.
EDIT: Added in the links from below to get them all in once place.
I just found this from Michigan’s AD, Dave Brandon. Things are pointing more and more towards a PSU-OSU divisions and UNL-UM division as far as splitting the big 4 go.
Purdue’s AD, Morgan Burke reiterates competitive balance. Also says that the decision on a 9-game conference schedule won’t come for awhile. This is important to them since their Non-Con schedule is pretty full for a few years.
Wisconsin’s Barry Alveraz notes that each school will get to protect one rivalry.
Delany talks about the future of 9-game conference schedules.
Another great link where ESPN blogger Adam Rittenberg interviews Jim Delany.
Alveraz says that Iowa and Wisconsin will be in separate divisions.
This FanPost created by a registered user of Corn Nation.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
interesting
I like the idea of being in Michigan’s division, especially right now when they’re down. We can get a series lead on them like Texas did on us. Hahahahaha!
Damn Wolverines!
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
Addition
I just found this from Michigan’s AD, Dave Brandon. Things are pointing more and more towards a PSU-OSU divisions and UNL-UM division as far as splitting the big 4 go.
by Aaron Musfeldt on Aug 20, 2010 11:29 AM CDT reply actions
It seems to me,
…from what I am able to read that NU will be in the same division as UM. For NU it can’t get any better than that. If the pairings come down as most of suspect, NU has a great shot at playing for the CC their first year in the conference.
Does anyone know
when this information will be released? What is the timeline for these decisions to be made and released?
Like the idea of UM and UNL being in the same division. Can’t see UW staying in the west, they will probably in the eastern division. How will that affect some of the trophy games that take place? Will there be more protected rivalries than just UM and tOST?
Divisions determined by start of the season
All reports state that they want the divisions announced by the end of this month.
A few more snippets
Just found a couple more quotes from AD’s.
Purdue’s AD, Morgan Burke reiterates competitive balance. Also says that the decision on a 9-game conference schedule won’t come for awhile.
Wisconsin’s Barry Alveraz notes that each school will get to protect one rivalry.
Then I think it will get split up as follows
UM, UNL, MN, WI, IA, MSU
OSU, PSU, PU, IN, IL, NU
The problem being that the second group is strong at the top (probably 2 of the top 3) and then bottom feeders. The top would have UNL as one of the top 3 and then potentially numbers 4 through 6. I would rather take a page out of the SEC and make rivalries, not “balance” the main goal.
No one is getting Rubio's rights unless they pry them from our cold dead fingers.
by TheEvilProfessor on Aug 25, 2010 8:31 AM CDT reply actions
That would be a fun setup for UNL
I would actually love those divisions, but then people would complain about the competitive balance issue. The way the AD’s are talking I’m guessing it will end up something like:
Division 1
OSU
PSU
Minn
Wisc
Purdue
Illinois
Division 2
Michigan
Mich State
UNL
Iowa
Indiana
Northwestern
Not 100% certain about the Indiana/Illinois schools, but this seems to preserve most trophy games while keeping balance. They each get a cross-over game too (per Alveraz-see above link). The conference could go a lot of different ways on the cross-over games as well. My cross-overs would be:
OSU-Mich
Penn State-Mich State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Nebraska-Minnesota
Indiana-Purdue
Illinois-Northwestern
However, it could very easily be PSU-UNL or UNL-UW / Minnesota-Iowa. I think they break up the Minnesota/Iowa/Wisconsin trio but try to put UNL in the mix with those three to soften the blow. This would leave the PSU-MSU game still available whether they care about it or not.
by Aaron Musfeldt on Aug 25, 2010 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions
as a MN fan
it is painful to lose IA, but I would make the tradeoff for Nebraska. But I fear that Delaney tries to pair up Nebraska and PSU instead.
No one is getting Rubio's rights unless they pry them from our cold dead fingers.
by TheEvilProfessor on Aug 26, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions
this is also the most current rumored split
No one is getting Rubio's rights unless they pry them from our cold dead fingers.
by TheEvilProfessor on Aug 26, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Ohio State Perspective - from a Husker living in Columbus, OH
Lots of talk on split divisions . . . notion of splitting up the “big Four” sits well but also think the next two (Iowa/Wisconsin) need to go opposite divisions as well. Talk of moving the Michigan / Ohio State game away from last game of season is creating a LOT of discontent.

by 























