Big Ten Expansion Hits Fast Track
At this week's meeting of the Association of American Universities, all eleven Big Ten presidents are meeting to discuss the future of the Big Ten, and by all accounts, the Big Ten is ready to fire the first round of conference expansion. By all accounts, the Big Ten is looking to add three and potentially five teams to the Big Ten. Who are those teams? We might find out in the next week, as Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany's first actions would be to notify the other conferences who they might be interested in.
What does a 16 team Big Ten mean, other than a new name? First of all, it represents a challenge to the Southeastern Conference, who has moved into the forefront ion college football. In all likelihood, the SEC would likely consider expansion as well. The Pac Ten would almost certainly look to expand as well, if only to get a conference championship game.
When those dominoes fall, what will college football look like? Very likely, there will only be four conferences remaining: the Big Ten, the SEC, the ACC, and the Pac 10. The Big Ten will likely target several members of the Big East, thus spelling the end of the Big East, at least in football. If the SEC and Pac 10 decide to expand, the overtures will likely focus on the Big XII.
Texas probably won't be a fit for the Big Ten...but what about the SEC? Pairing up the Longhorns with Texas A&M and possibly Oklahoma would be a natural for the SEC. Who would that fourth team be? Well, what about the Nebraska Cornhuskers? Assuming that the SEC wouldn't try to pick off Miami and Florida State, Nebraska brings a brand pedigree and gives the SEC a bit of a presence in the Midwest that couldn't be ignored by broadcasters. Of course, Nebraska will probably be one of the candidates to join the Big Ten as well. Could this actually kick off a bidding war?Assuming that Missouri ends up in the Big Ten, the remaining Big XII schools would likely be a target for the Pac 10, who would feel the need to get to 16 teams as well. Kansas and Colorado would be the first choice to establish a presence east of the Rockies, and Texas Tech and Oklahoma State would help fill that out. Kansas State might sneak in along with a BYU, Utah, or Boise State. Iowa State and Baylor might be left out in the cold.
The remains of the Big East probably would fold into the ACC to finish off the conference consolidation.
Whether Nebraska wants to remain in the Big XII might become irrelevant if the Big XII ceases to exist under realignment. In this scenario, it becomes every man for himself. The discussions behind closed doors are about to be exposed, and it could be a rather explosive, radical change. Chaos may soon reign in college football.
So what's your prediction for what happens to Nebraska? And what's your preference?
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
you know.....
I liked that picture of Osborne, and wondered which of us would be the first to use it. Ha!
However….. I wish they’d have taken a torso – level picture…. ’cause the guy looked like Mr Cool….. Mr Big, maybe.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
On
the conference expansion talk….. I think it has to happen. Something has to happen. They’re all looking for more money.
I truly believe that in a couple of years, the college football landscape is going to be greatly altered from what we have now.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
I agree...it's going to happen..
…and I think the Big XII is going to be one of the two conferences that get realigned out of existence. The Big XII made a lot of sense in it’s day, but the dynamics in force are stronger than conference allegiance.
Texas wants nothing to do with the SEC...
…they have made that very, very clear over the years. They will go to the Pac-10 first.
We'll carry the banner high!
Bring On The Cats
Maybe...
…but Bill Byrne points out that travel from Texas to Washington is a killer, even with charter airplanes. The SEC offers more money and shorter travel than the Pac-10. The closest Pac-10 school (Arizona State) is about the same distance from Austin as Gainesville, FL (Florida).
That's all fine...
…but Texas considers itself a “Public Ivy” school, and was unable to bully the SEC on admissions requirements, use of partial qualifiers, etc. last time around, which is part of why it chose the Big 8 expansion. For Texas, this isn’t as much about athletics as it is academics (and their intersection with athletics). Read the Texas sites. They want absolutely nothing to do with the SEC. My guess is UT considers its options 1) Big 12, 2) Pac-10, 3) Big 10, 4) Independent…………..1,394,593) SEC.
Texas’ disdain for the SEC rivals that of most Nebraska fans for Texas.
We'll carry the banner high!
Bring On The Cats
by TB on Apr 21, 2010 6:36 AM CDT up reply actions
TB is right
UT has repeatedly turned down the SEC and wants nothing to do with it. I do think that us lay people are greatly underestimating the importance of the connection between the North schools and Texas. (the state, not program) If Nebraska somehow jumps to the Big Ten, then the school is aligning itself with a collection of universities in states with little to no population or economic growth and containing rapid aging populations. What that spells is if recruits are a program’s natural resource, the Big Ten doesn’t have it. If fact I would contend that Texas itself has as much elite football talent than the whole Big Ten area due to it younger population and the importance of football in general.
Yes, the TV revenues are huge, but that will seem like pocket change if Nebraska can no longer maintain/regain its status as a football powerhouse. Hopefully Missou will think likewise if offered.
I just don't see it happening
For whatever reason, I just don’t see 4 superconferences in our immediate future. Yes, I know that too often college football is a money chase, but to me, there’s just waaay too much that can go wrong.
For starters, I don’t really see Texas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska really wanting to go anywhere. These three ARE the Big 12. I doubt either of the southern teams would want to go to the SEC and get their chops busted by Florida and Bama every year, and the Big 10 doesn’t geographically make sense. As for Nebraska, I don’t see us leaving all of our ties and traditions behind. There would be a huge uproar across the state.
Second, I think the idea of the Big 10 going to 16 is overblown. That would be a MASSIVE shock to the conference, and it would be very difficult to orchestrate, as they have to please so many parties. If the Big 10 doesn’t go massive, the SEC won’t need to expand, and the chain reaction starts to fall apart.
Prediction:
Big 10 gets shot down by Notre Dame and they settle for either Cinci or Pitt.
PAC 10 picks up two western teams (not CU or anyone else from the Big 12).
Big 12, Big East, ACC, and SEC are unchanged.
I hope I’m right. As much as we all love to bitch about Texas, we’ve got it pretty good in the Big 12, and we’d be demoted to a junior member in the event of a merger. Plus losing OU ( and even Mizzou and CU) would be kinda hard to stomach.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
Timing
How would the timing work? I was pretty young when the Big 8 went to XII, so I don’t recall how quickly things moved after the announcement. With the conference schedules set years ahead, does that mean that an announcement could happen, but nothing will actually take place until 4,5,6 years down the road?
faster than that.....
Big 12 was basically formed February, 1994, and the teams started playing in ’96, so… they played the ’95 season as the Big 8, then in ’96 went straight into the Big 12.
Whether or not we had already been playing a bunch of the teams because they were Big 8 teams isn’t relevant. If Nebraska were to change conferences, then the conference would dictate the schedule, not the individual teams, so you wouldn’t have the haggling that goes on with non-conference games.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Apr 20, 2010 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Hope pray and will beg if I have too
Really do not want to see any confrence go to 16 teams. Will be too much to cover as a casual fan. For instance, the big east in basketball has that many teams and can more that a handful of people name all of them? The smaller teams will get lost in the schuffle will the bigger schools will get stronger. This is my honest opinion and have been known to be wrong. Like I said it is one of my fears that it will happen
College
football isn’t about tradition and rivalries anymore. No matter how much we would like to think it is. Those allegences to rivalries died with the formation of the Bix XII and the death of the best rivalry in college Huskers vs. Sooners. Yes, the rivalry is DEAD!!!! Texas is who OU has to focus on to win the conference every year not the Huskers making them the Sooners rival similar to the Huskers during the Big Eight years. When you have to show old game films to educate and motivate current roster members the rivalry is gone. It might not be to the fans but to the players, sorry its dead.
Why not?
I don’t know if I buy that Husker fans will riot if there is a change in tradition. Tradition was changed when the Big 12 was formed, and to be honest…I think that fans are more adaptive than one might think.
Plus, don’t you have to be more forward thinking than worrying about not playing OU or CU anymore? Don’t get me wrong, the OU game is huge for me…always has been. But the powers that control these things aren’t thinking about losing traditions, trust me. They’re thinking about building new ones, and yes…more money. The fact that Nebraska would have a border rivalry with Iowa each year, and get a chance to build up the love/hate rivalry with schools like Michigan, Penn State, and Ohio State is probably what is being discussed. I just don’t think that people in that position make decisions based on the past, they base them on what could be.
I kind of like the idea to be honest. Whatever helps the university and it’s programs. Of course I’m the kind of person that thinks you have to play the best competition to be the best, and I’m sick of the stigma of playing in the Big 12 North.
"Not the victory but the action; Not the goal but the game;
In the deed the glory"
GO BIG RED!























