Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UEFA Champions League 2012: Chelsea Wins on Penalties

Bowl Season: ESPN Wins, Fans Lose

Something hit me hard this week as I looked over the bowl game schedule.  ESPN now has nearly complete control over college football's bowl season. Looking over the schedule, only the Sun Bowl on New Years Eve (CBS) and the Cotton Bowl a week later (Fox) will not be televised as an ESPN production.  ESPN not only has the television rights to the BCS, but also owns and operates seven bowl games.

Remember 15 years ago on New Years Day?  Both ABC and NBC televised tripleheaders, while CBS added the Cotton Bowl, meaning that throughout the day, it was a football smorgasbord, with game after game. If one game sucked, just change the channel.

Star-divide

Next Saturday, ABC only televises one game, CBS shows none, and NBC is televising the NHL Winter Classic from Heinz Field.  Football bowl games have eventually been abdicated to cable television and the ESPN borg.  And it gets even worse from there, as we're treated to bad matchup after bad matchup.  Oklahoma plays UConn in the Fiesta Bowl. Yuck.  Missouri vs. Iowa?  A rematch with Nebraska and Washington?  Sure, the BCS title game is a good matchup, but most of the rest are forced matchups, the result of a system that broke down years ago and frankly isn't serving the interests of college football and it's fans.

The Football Bowl Association tries to defend the bowl "tradition" by pointing out the value of the teams who make hospital visits in bowl cities. True, that's a side benefit.  But that's only in a handful of warm weather bowl cities. Certainly, there's something to be said about acts of charity, but those acts of charity aren't directly the result of bowl games.  If teams were playing closer to home, perhaps in a playoff system or NIT format, these same opportunities would be available nationwide, not just in cities that host bowls.

Fans certainly are rejecting bowl games this season, with a few exceptions where the matchup or local situation makes the game more compelling and worth the premium cost of traveling during the holiday period. Nebraska didn't sell out there allotment; undesirable matchup means fewer fans. The economy is an issue, but the economy was worse in 2009, when Husker fans flocked to San Diego.

I think this is something that'll change eventually.  The risk of these matchups is going to the schools, who have to commit to buying these tickets. Nobody forced these teams to accept bowl bids, though you have to admit that it would be nearly impossible to reject a bowl bid if it were offered.  Even at these losses.

But the correct alternative will eventually emerge.  A playoff system based on home playoff sites up until the final game means better attendance, as larger stadiums and reduced travel for fans means more people can attend. And an NIT type system where teams who don't qualify for the playoffs get to play a game, but freed from the restrictions of the bowl system.

I understand why ESPN loves the bowls.  They control them, and they are a source of cheap holiday programming, as most bowls pay far less than teams receive for road games. But it's not a sustainable model; in the end, schools can't afford to subsidize the bowl system and pay ESPN for the privilege of getting a game televised in the middle of the holiday week.

There has to be a better way than what we've got.

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yeah...

I don’t have cable or satellite, and my internet provider doesn’t offer ESPN 3. If I could pay separately for ESPN 3, but they decided they want to screw people over who have internet companies that are already screwing them over. I will get to watch probably 4 bowl games this year, and 2 of them will only be because I’m with relatives who have ESPN. This sucks.

by Billgrip on Dec 24, 2010 12:07 PM CST reply actions  

And trust me..

I’d be watching every single game if I could. I wonder how many other people there are out there that are like me that the telelvision markets are completely missing by letting ESPN have most of the games.

by Billgrip on Dec 24, 2010 12:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Always hated that change...

That smorgasbord of football on New Years Day was what made the bowl season. I remember how you could watch all the games on the Big 3 channels (laughing…how old am I huh?). I do agree that ESPN has way too much control over the bowls and spreading them out over a two week period,and where/how do they justify putting these new no history bowls on Jan 1…oh well, just another example of how much the almighty $ rules and corporations come before the fans. Thanks CN for letting me semi-rant.

Merry Christmas Husker Nation
and be safe

GBR!
throw dem bones!!!

by hskrntnfreak on Dec 24, 2010 1:41 PM CST reply actions  

Between ESPN having a complete monopoly on the television side and the automatic tie-ins, the bowl system will more than likely be dead in 5-6 years.

There are enough schools who are financially strapped as-is, the added cost of travel for teams and with ticket revenue hitting rock bottom, I’d be surprised if we don’t see teams turning down bowl invites in the very near future.

It’s always surprised me when the NCAA has said “A playoff in college football would cause players to miss too much class time,” but apparently class time isn’t as important in Div 1-AA and lower or in EVERY OTHER COLLEGE SPORT.

I would not be utterly surprised if the NCAA eventually ends up in hot water for being a multi-billion dollar industry under the veil of being a non-profit.

Playoffs are coming, and it may be sooner than we all think.

@GochfaceKillah on Twitter

by Screwface on Dec 24, 2010 5:15 PM CST reply actions  

Hope you're right,,,,

the current system is not working. I guess it’s all about the money!! Why not have a championship game for all conferences, then work a playoff system around that? Get rid of the rankings and pair the conference champs up and use a bracket system. Only a few more games and after they crown the Nat. Champ. then pair up teams for bowl games. Just a thought.

Matthew 11:28-30
Smoke em' if you got em'!!!
Low and Slow!!!

by sd.husker on Dec 25, 2010 5:24 PM CST up reply actions  

ESPN is just too big to be healthy for sports.

They’ve done the same thing to the preseason basketball tournaments as they have to the bowls. They’ve ceased to be simple news providers and started altering events by throwing their weight around. Something like The Decision never could have happened five years ago. ESPN is not inherently or even intentionally evil, but its mere existence in its present form is bad for sports.

"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"

by Boiler Bandsman on Dec 24, 2010 8:05 PM CST reply actions  

Had a convo

similar to this w/ my uncle last weekend during our family Xmas get together. The bowls are definitely too spread out and it was much better when you could just watch all day on New Year’s. Now the friggin Cotton Bowl is on the 7th fercrissakes!

I'm your huckleberry.

by Brizzle T on Dec 24, 2010 8:43 PM CST reply actions  

Death to ESPN!

Join me my brothers, and together we will take down the facist bourgeois and take back what is rightfully ours! A proud day of college football on New Years day! The revolution starts now!

LTC Kilgore: How you feelin' Jimmy?
Door Gunner: Like a mean motherfucker sir!

by Look_A_Red_Squirrel on Dec 25, 2010 1:35 PM CST reply actions  

Resistance is Futile.

Assimilation of all bowl games and every pro league play-offs soon to come.

Espn = WalMart.

by MtJulietTNBillsFan on Dec 25, 2010 2:47 PM CST reply actions  

Playoffs and Bowls

I keep hearing how a playoff would kill the bowls…..that, I believe is bull crap. It would probably kill the BCS bowls and maybe hurt the Cotton and Gator bowls but the rest would be the same as they are now….meaningless.
You would still have a Championship game so it wouldnt suffer, in fact, you may just get more people traveling to it as it would be an actual championship game instead of the current MNC game we have now. The Orange, Rose, Fiesta, and Sugar wouldnt get the same big name high ranked teams they do now nor would the Cotton or Gator bowls as those teams would most likely be involved in the playoffs. The rest of the bowls would continue to get the mid to low qualifying teams they are getting now so I dont see that those games would mean anything less then they do today.

You can have BOTH the playoffs and the bowls and still survive and most likely bring in more money then you do right now.

by taflorom on Dec 27, 2010 7:32 AM CST reply actions  

ESPN

dominates sports television. Ever since Disney purchased them their pockets are deeper and if they want it they get it. Get a playoff this system is broke it rewards teams for playing terrible opponents just to stay undefeated and the politics are terrible also. To tell you the truth I haven’t watched a game yet and probably won’t until we play in the Holiday Bowl. A nice bowl but terrible rematch. I will be sure to miss the biggest travesty of all UCONN vs. OU. What the hell is UCONN in a BCS game for? If OU blows this one like they did against Boise State they will never live it down. Other than the Auburn and Oregon game I would say the Sooners have the most pressure on them to win.

by Huzkerfan on Dec 27, 2010 10:22 AM CST reply actions  

Thank You

This was a well-written and insightful read. I don’t like the BCS, but I don’t like a playoff system either. I think Bowl Games are worth saving. You make a great point about network competition playing a big role in the matchups. I hope that, as fans, we can vote with television ratings and game attendance rather than asking someone to regulate CFB, by which we risk it being messed up even more.

by Bugs Dodger on Dec 27, 2010 9:18 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CN needs your tips! Inform us with an email to: cornnation - at - gmail.com. Better yet, join the CN community and create a fanpost or fanshot!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Introduction to the BIGTEN

Recent FanPosts

Small
Huskers catching up with A&M to win Espn contest. Help vote!
Mschultz_small
College Football should be banned - Comments?
N656335037_2472909_5238_small
Please Donate During EDSBS's Charity Drive
Small
How can the B1G improve in baseball?
Nyjer_morgan_butterfly_small
Help a CNer Out - Give Your Opinion on Online Discussion
10982_lores_small
Corn Nation March Appreciation - Congrats, Husker Pucks!
Small
Do you think Notre Dame will ever join the B1G?
Small
Tim Miles = Great Hire!!!
10982_lores_small
CornNation March Appreciation, Day Five

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SHOP THE CORN NATION STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

More Texa$$ Arrogance
Irish payout to Weis keeps piling up
Call me anal retentive, but this is NOT how Nebraska Baseball should make it to ESPiN. The best...
Building for the B1G. Recent aerial photo of Memorial Stadium expansion and Haymarket arena construction from HuskerMax.com.
Adam Carriker writes NEW blog, "Draft Day" on ProInterviews
Alfonzo Dennard bond set at $5000
Brook Berringer, 16 Years On....RIP, #18.

From our friends at HuskerMax.com.
Athletic Department Announces Two Options for Redeeming Spring Game Tickets
Adam Carriker writes about the Off-Season on Pro Interviews
New LB Huskers Commit

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

Photo_6_small Jon Johnston

Rc_icon_small Husker Mike

Editors

Hobbes2_small JLew

Bern_hat_small Brian Speers

Mel-gibson-braveheart-photograph-c1010192231_small Billgrip

Sword_011_small Aaron Musfeldt

Rickysmith_small Ricky Smith

Al_bundy_vs_chobot_small Andy Ketterson

Authors

Cornguy_small Cobby

Sb22_small William Grubb

Pelini_small AdamTheTitan