Silly Season against Husker Coaches Running Amok
If I'm Ron Brown, I'm either thanking the Good Lord for being spared the wrath of the last couple of weeks, or quietly wondering why everyone has ignored him for the last week. It seems Brown is the only Husker coach who hasn't been the target of speculation or criticism in the last couple of weeks...and for the most part, the speculation and criticism is really unfounded.
I get why people are a little uppity around the Husker fan base; I'm not happy with how the Big XII Championship game turned out either. But to borrow a saying from Bill Callahan: "It is what it is." I don't have an explanation as to why Taylor Martinez was allowed to finish the game, and I don't think we're going to get one. The coaches made their decision, and they have to live with it.
If that was the limit of the criticism, I could possibly sign off on it. But for the last 10 days, it's been one thing after another. Criticism of Shawn Watson's record in Big XII Championship games. The pursuit of Bo Pelini by the University of Miami. Rumors of Carl Pelini, John Papuchis, Ted Gilmore, and Mike Ekeler leaving. Lack of production at times by Barney Cotton's offensive line. After a while, it's gotten a little excessive.Let's start with Watson. Watson's record in Big XII Championship games in recent years is not so good, but let's not forget what he had to work with. A 2005 Colorado team fighting off the death spiral of the Gary Barnett era, and against a Texas team that went on to win a national championship. A 2009 Nebraska team that struggled to find healthy I-backs, offensive lineman, and a quarterback on the field. We knew those teams weren't great offensive teams for various reasons. 2010 looked like it was going to break that mold...until Taylor Martinez limped off the field just before halftime of the Missouri game. Martinez was never the same though he was back in the game for a couple of the games, but without his game-breaking speed, the offense suffered. Some blame Watson for this, but let's remember that football is quickly becoming a quarterback driven game. How good would Auburn have been without Cam Newton this season? How important was Colt McCoy for Texas last year?
I say this not to imply that Watson should be praised for his offense, but rather that fans remember that when Nebraska was down two of the Huskers three game-breakers in the biggest game of the year, you have to expect a bit of a struggle. Is Watson going to Vanderbilt? Don't know. But be careful what you wish for. People were awfully excited about Bill Callahan running the Nebraska offense in 2004, but by 2007, most Husker fans would have gladly used up their vacation time to help Callahan pack up his house after that Oklahoma State game.
I've heard criticism after criticism of Bo Pelini in the last week, starting with the rumors regarding Miami. The story out of Miami carried on for days without any basis in reality. Every Pelini statement was then dissected and rehashed to look for what wasn't being said. Did anybody ever follow through in Miami to try and validate the story? Hardly. Instead, idle speculation became validated in a vacuum. Nature abhors a vacuum, and the media wouldn't accept anything less than an "I'm planning to stay at Nebraska for the next 40 years." Of course, all you have to do is look at Nick Saban and realize that even that isn't going to cut it. It's a lose-lose proposition for coaches who don't want to have to debunk the story every time someone makes up a rumor. (See Martinez, Taylor, re: transfer/suspension)
Did Bo Pelini talk to someone about the Miami job? He probably took one phone call, and that's about it. And that phone call likely might have been placed cold, with no forewarning as to what was happening or going to happen. So when the media kept rehashing the same old story, Pelini was forced to issue a statement, which then was promptly hashed up to identify what wasn't said. Then yesterday, things went from silly to absurd when someone asked Pelini about his birthday. My guess is Pelini took that question as "we have nothing else to ask, so this discussion is over." And of course, the media then runs with it. Even sportswriters in Columbia, Missouri try to make something out of it.
I'm not saying that there aren't questions about where Nebraska football is, but I've had enough of fans and media making mountains out of molehills. In case people haven't realized it, Nebraska's won two more games in under three years with Bo Pelini than they won in four years under Bill Callahan. Nebraska football isn't quite back, but it's closer than it has been since the start of the millenium. Last week, ESPN's Colin Cowherd suggested that Pelini might be considered by some to be in the same class as Nick Saban and Urban Meyer. That's excessive hyperbole, because Pelini doesn't have the resume those two gentlemen have... yet.. That being said, I think it's something that everybody around these parts need to keep in mind. There's a lot of good things happening with Nebraska football; there's no need to obsess or rumor about something bad. Criticism is one thing, but let's have some balance out there.
Frankly, if I'm Ron Brown, I'm thinking now's the time to schedule another school presentation. Maybe a good distraction by the ACLU will quiet out much of the criticism. Or maybe he can get away with one, especially if Watson takes the offensive coordinator job with Texas.
38 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here, here!
Finally, the voice of reason appears on CN! Thank you Mike. Thank you. Thank you. Thank yoooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!
No get out there and win the Holiday Bowl so everyone can sit back and throw darts at Doc Sadler! Me being the wrestling fan have already destroyed Mark Manning in every way imaginable in my mind. Can’t do it in real life because he can kick my ass!
by jon's only friend on Dec 15, 2010 6:31 AM CST reply actions
There is nothing wrong with a 10-11 win season. At that rate, you compete for the conference title. Getting to the NCG is very tough and you really have to have a special team to do this. That’s not going to happen very often with our current setup. Getting there (and possibly winning) should be considered icing on the cake.
current setup =
BCS. I’m not backing or dogging the BCS. It is what it is.
by Aaron Musfeldt on Dec 15, 2010 7:03 AM CST up reply actions
You don't know it...
but I just gave you a standing ovation.
Thanks, Mike.
Nice post
Mike. Everyone may have overreacted after that title game, me included.
I can appreciate some of the sentiment of the article
but it sounds like we’re making excuses for losing games we should have won. Maybe it’s just me…
No, I'm accepting the loss...
I’m suggesting that in December, Oklahoma was the better team. I wish it wasn’t, and I think this team and this coaching staff is going to work to figure out what went wrong. Oklahoma deserved to win that game.
Aaaaahhhhhhhh......
Finally, a voice of reason and sanity on this site that has become, at times, worse than a 12-year-old’s Facebook page. THANK YOU, Husker Mike!
Here’s a holiday toast to an end to ridiculous rumors, and to a Husker victory December 30th. Go Big Red!
I wish I could write something like that.
That was exceptional.
LTC Kilgore: How you feelin' Jimmy?
Door Gunner: Like a mean motherfucker sir!
by Look_A_Red_Squirrel on Dec 15, 2010 2:29 PM CST reply actions
Good job, Mike.
This place was getting as bad as Huskerpedia for a while. A 10 win “failure” of a season? Gimme a break.
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.
While I agree with many of your sentiments...
I have to vehemently disagree with the “It could be worse” mindset. While you didn’t say those words, they were implied.
People need to realize that the world of college football isn’t “A” or “B.” It isn’t Pelini or Callahan. There are numerous variables that can change both “A” and “B.”. How different would 2007 have been if Will Muschamp was Nebraska’s D-coordinator under Callahan instead of Kevin Cosgrove? What would 2010 been like if Gus Malzahn was Nebraska’s O-coordinator instead of Shawn Watson? This is total conjecture, but the point remains.
If anyone wants proof of what top-flight programs do when desired results aren’t acheived, one needs to look no further than Texas. While they may not currently be the best depiction, having virtually no coaching staff, they realized their offense woefully under-performed and Greg Davis “paid the price.”
I’m honestly content with winning 11 games this year, however, performing the way the offense did in it’s 3 losses was unacceptable.
@GochfaceKillah on Twitter
by Screwface on Dec 15, 2010 2:54 PM CST via mobile reply actions
LMAO! Yet, another picture I am stealing from you.
Screwface did have a great point, though.
by HerpieHusker on Dec 15, 2010 6:44 PM CST up reply actions
How does this even apply? He made his points and I made my counter-points. Plus I commented earlier this afternoon, not in the middle of the night.
/SMUGjpgreplyfail
@GochfaceKillah on Twitter
by Screwface on Dec 15, 2010 7:00 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I'm almost positive I know monsatano from another forum
he won’t waste any chance to make a sly, clever remark. Unfortunately, most of the time he makes a funny so it works.
by HerpieHusker on Dec 15, 2010 7:08 PM CST up reply actions
Disappointing, yes. Unacceptable? No.
I am a guy that is looking for constant improvement, and frankly, yes, we had improvement every year from Bo Pelini. Nebraska football isn’t where I want it to be, likely where you want it to be, and definitely not where Bo Pelini wants it to be.
I’m fine with criticism, but let’s make it constructive criticism. I don’t think we throw anybody under the bus after the best season for Nebraska football since 2001. (Another season where people wanted to throw coaches under the bus, I might add…)
I still believe that Nebraska could have and should have won every game this season. But they didn’t. What should happen as a result? Well, I don’t think 10-3 is a fireable offense in any world not ruled by a egomanic who’s name rhymes with Leave Federson.
I would whole-heartedly agree...
If we had seen improvement from the offense. But, we didn’t. This offense was statistically worse in the second half of the B12CG than it was in the second half of the B12CG last year. What’s worse is that Texas’ defense from last year was lightyears ahead of Oklahoma’s defense this year.
But above all else, Watson has shown to be a horrible play caller in clutch situations. He consistently goes away from what’s working to avoid being “predictable,” when he’s actually more predictable by doing so.
When a local newspaper writer has a list taped to their desk of a coaches pros and cons, and the cons far outweigh the pros, I think it tells you all you need to know.
@GochfaceKillah on Twitter
We have seen improvement from the offense.
It was strong to phenomenal for most or all of 7 games (W. Ky., Idaho, Washington, K St., OK St., Missouri, Colorado).
How many games was it phenomenal for at this point last year? The three nonconference patsies?
I don’t think the offense is anywhere near where any of us want it, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t substantially better than last year. Yes, it was still infuriatingly mediocre during key stretches and was incredibly inconsistent once Martinez got injured, but this year was not even in the same league as last year offensively.
I know the second half of the Big 12 Championship Game is still fresh in our minds, but let’s not forget that the rest of the season happened, too.
by Cheeseandcorn on Dec 15, 2010 10:25 PM CST up reply actions
So what you’re saying is 12 points in two games against average competition was ok? I have a problem with that. I’m going to ride Kevin Kugler’s school of thought on this, “Nobody from the Callahan regime should have been spared their jobs.”
@GochfaceKillah on Twitter
by Screwface on Dec 15, 2010 11:52 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I have to agree here
I don’t think Shawn Watson should be fired, but I do think that Nebraska can do better than him. Cheeseandcorn actually said it best, although I believe he credited someone else with the statement…. (paraphrased)
When Bo Pelini demands the same level of excellence from his offense that he does from his defense, we’ll no longer be in this situation. Until then, expect more of the same.
Having said that…. wow, the rumors were (are?) insane this season. And it’s not just Nebraska. You could look around the nation and find the same things happening at other programs.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Dec 16, 2010 7:53 AM CST up reply actions
Of course 12 points in two games is not OK
(I assume you’re talking about Texas and Texas A&M, in which case, I would hardly consider Texas’ #7-in-the-country defense “average,” but whatever.)
I never said it was OK. I’m not happy with the offense either, and as Jon quoted me above, I think Bo’s not demanding excellence out of the offense because he knows he doesn’t really understand offense. That’s not OK.
But the offense is clearly, demonstrably, significantly better than last year. That may just be a change from “awful” to “meh,” but it’s still improvement. I think it needs to show further significant improvement under Watson next year, because Bo’s defenses are too good to be paired with “meh” offenses.
by Cheeseandcorn on Dec 16, 2010 8:00 AM CST up reply actions
Given Bo's lack of sentimentality when it comes to players and playing time (see Dillard, Phillip and Thenarse, Ricky),
I’d say Watson probably knows he’s running out of chances. Every coach will have his blind spots, but I really don’t see Pelini sticking with an offense that continues to actually cost the team victories.
I’m trying to figure out what happened between 2008 and today, because at the time I thought keeping Watson was a fine idea. I’m still not 100% in the “Watson must go” camp, but there obviously needs to be improvement, and quickly, given the amount of talent that’s there.
"...water for the corn." — petromax spambot
Here's my guess at what happened
In 2008, Watson had the perfect player to build his ideal offense around: A gutsy, cerebral, accurate quarterback (Joe Ganz), along with a decent RB tandem (Lucky/Helu) and solid WRs (Swift/Peterson/Purify) for a passing-based West Coast offense that was balanced between horizontal and vertical attacks. That was Watson’s dream scenario. (2006 with Zac Taylor was a lot like this, too.)
In 2009-10, the Huskers decided they wanted to be more “multiple” – i.e. move more toward the spread and zone read. Except they didn’t have the line or the players at the skill positions (especially QB) to run it – or anything else – well. They’ve started to recruit the right guys for it, but they’re just not ready yet, and we don’t have time to sit around and wait for them.
For about five games in early 2010, Watson had reached spread/zone read nirvana, but he quickly found out that (a) he didn’t know the zone read-based offense well enough to make adjustments against fast defenses; and (b) he had no idea what the heck to do once Martinez got hurt.
by Cheeseandcorn on Dec 16, 2010 10:32 AM CST up reply actions
That sounds about right for all I know.
It leaves me saying the same thing I’ve said since Solich was fired: Husker fans want to win, regardless of what style of offense makes it happen. The question is, does Wats continue learning and moving toward Pelini’s often-stated preference for a “multiple” offense, or does he look for greener pastures where he can run the offense he’s most able to run effectively?
"Whoever drinks beer, he is quick to sleep; whoever sleeps well does not sin; whoever does not sin, enters Heaven! Thus, let us drink beer!" Martin Luther
honestly
I still don’t get all the line pulling, especially when our linemen can’t reach the edge very often.
maybe i’ll reach out to someone wiser…. for an explanation…..
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Dec 16, 2010 3:27 PM CST up reply actions
Barney Cotton...
The man only knows how to coach 260lbs offensive guards, what do you expect?
@GochfaceKillah on Twitter
by Screwface on Dec 16, 2010 6:05 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
We are talking about the same Texas team that gave up 3,652 points to Kansas State.
I’m, above all, frustrated with the way things shook out this year.
@GochfaceKillah on Twitter
by Screwface on Dec 16, 2010 2:19 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
That sports writer is exhibit A on my list of things out of control....
Did you even watch that second half of the Big XII Championship game? Nebraska was trying to run a drop-back passing attack with a running quarterback with two bad wheels. We can argue if you will that he was playing the wrong quarterback, but please, I don’t want to hear about being a “horrible play caller” in that situation.
You just made my "he's a horrible play caller" point.
He knew he had a running quarterback with two bad wheels in the game and continued calling drop-back passing plays.
What am I missing?
@GochfaceKillah on Twitter
by Screwface on Dec 16, 2010 9:44 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Thank-you Husker Mike for
reasoned commentary. I couldn’t quite figure out what had been bothering me about my beloved Huskers over the last few weeks. A couple of lousy games . . . yes, I could figure out why that bothered me . . . but something else was amiss. Husker Mike put words to my confusion – media rumormongering and witless criticism by fans was the cause of my discomfort. Husker fans have been well known as being intelligent about college football; let us not allow Husker Nation to become an Idiocracy (a nation ruled by idiots).
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

































