Report Card: Huskers 6, Texas A&M Aggies 9
[Jon - I delayed Mike's report card until Monday Morning, so it's me being late again, not him. Besides, you got all excited about that Martinez thing, didn't you? Wasn't that enough for one night? :) ]
It's only natural that after a bad night that you try to look for any extenuating circumstances. And last night, it seems that there were a bunch of extenuating circumstance. Yes, the Aggies Twelfth Man was wearing stripes last night. That being said, we can't forget one simple fact.
Nebraska didn't play a great game last night. A&M outexecuted the Huskers, and they won the game. In all the criticism of the officiating, that little observation is getting lost. Whining and complaining about the officiating might make us feel better, but it's not going to do any good other than the cathartic effect. We know not to expect Dan Beebe to do anything about it, even if he possibly could.
In the meantime, it's a short week coming up. Three weeks ago, it looked like this Friday's game was going to be Dan Hawkins goodbye game...except his suckage was so immense that Colorado had to ditch him prematurely. The Buffaloes were handed over to longtime assistant Brian Cabral who bleeds Black and Gold, and Colorado is playing like they want Cabral to get the job. Colorado is playing for EVERYTHING this Friday: beat Nebraska, and the Buffs go to 6-6 and become bowl eligible. If Cabral does that, I have to think Cabral almost assuredly gets the job. He'll have earned the job, and he'd take the job for less money than nearly anybody else.
So now that we've sounded the alarm about this week, let's go back and revisit last night's Husker performance. As always, your comments are always welcome!
QB: For the first ten minutes, Taylor Martinez looked like he was about 95% back. He still didn't have that gamebreaking speed, but he was making plays. Then Martinez re-injured his ankle, and it was all downhill from there. Cody Green came in, and was mostly ineffective from my perspective...mostly because his teammates' penalties kept moving the Huskers back. Martinez came back in the second half, and the Huskers moved the ball better...but interceptions on the Texas A&M side of the field killed potential scoring drives, and that was the final straw. I know Martinez played hurt and was limited, but the mistakes are what killed the Huskers. Grade: FRB: There wasn't a lot of running room there, but Roy Helu and Rex Burkhead made the most of their limited opportunities. Burkhead gets a lot of credit for willing the team down the field after back to back penalties on the kickoff forced the Huskers to start a drive at the five yard line after a touchback. Grade: B-
WR: Niles Paul played tough, and made some clutch catches, including a screen pass where he broke several tackles to earn positive yardage. Brandon Kinnie had a couple of drops that I would normally swear would have been good catches. Kyler Reed is an emerging weapon at tight end. But Ben Cotton lost his composure and started the cavalcade of yellow hankies; we all know why, but it's always the retaliator who gets caught, not the classless instigator. (And yes, Beergut, we've noticed how you said you have avoided and censored this topic.) Grade: C-
OL: Six penalties by the linemen for 60 yards. Two on back-to-back plays by D.J. Jones turned added 20 yards to the first Husker field goal. A holding call on Keith Williams led to a Cody Green interception on the next play. A false start by Marcel Jones caused a three-and-out on Nebraska's opening possession of the second half. Some of this could be forgiven if the line were driving the Aggies off the ball...but they weren't. Not much production from the line, and a lot of negatives. Grade: F
DL: The line got a decent push most of the night, but could have done a better job later in the game helping contain Cyrus Gray. Grade: B+
LB: Once again, this was Lavonte David only, and he had another great night on the stat sheet. He continues to improve with his reads and his instincts are top notch. Grade: B+
Secondary: They did almost everything they could do to shut down the A&M receivers; half of their receptions were passes to Gray. The only complaint is the two pass interference penalties, and frankly, I still wonder if the second one on Dennard wasn't offensive interference. Grade: A-
Intangibles: Hard to ignore this one. Nebraska didn't handle the storm of negativity well last night, starting with Ben Cotton's double personal fouls while being assaulted by Tony Jerod-Eddie. Bo got increasingly incensed with the officials and erupted on the sideline, which didn't endear himself to the rest of the college football world..or the officials, who tossed their yellow hankies all night long. It obviously didn't help, and probably hurt the team badly. Bo is going to get a handle on this, and I think he will. Grade: F
Overall: D+ The Huskers went -14 in penalties and -2 in turnovers against a ranked opponent on the road, and only lost by three points. Not bad in that respect, but those penalties and turnovers are a huge problem.
Elsewhere in College Football
Colorado: A+ Anybody who thought this was going to be a cakewalk, think again. Colorado is surging with Brian Cabral motivating the Buffies and they're playing for a bowl bid. Grade: A+
Purdue: D Nice job leading Sparty...but what kind of punt protection was that???
Wrigley Field: A+ Yeah, the field layout made for an interesting set of rules, but let's be honest. Nobody would have paid attention to this game if were played in Evanston. The last minute ground rules change means that we'll almost certainly never see this again, but this was the perfect place to play a game like this.
93 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
2010 offense - healthy Taylor Martinez = 2009 offense
Which is sad, really. This year’s offense should be substantially better, even with Green or an immobile Martinez in there.
It seemed as though the Huskers had a gameplan for a healthy Martinez all set to go, and then had no Plan B when he got injured. Strike that – the Plan B must have been to go into its patented 2009 Offensive Shell. Martinez didn’t help, throwing picks both times he tried to throw the ball more than 15 yards in the air.
What happened to this offense? I think losing a healthy Martinez is a big part of it, but there has to be something more. The O-line hasn’t had a decent game since Missouri, and Martinez’s Okie State passing proficiency is looking more and more like a single-game mirage. Anyone got any ideas?
The OSU game
happened because Martinez was still a dual threat, so the WRs were open all day.
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.
Absolutely
The key to Martinez’s ability to pass is his ability to run. When that’s gone, defenses don’t need to spy on him and can drop everyone back into coverage on passing downs.
But what about everything else? The problems obviously go much deeper than that.
by Cheeseandcorn on Nov 22, 2010 3:22 PM CST up reply actions
NU offensive staff: F-
Penalties, substitution delays and a really myopic gameplan all fall on the shoulders of Watson & Co. The attitude that led to just beating the hell out of Washington and Mizzou has disappeared: it’s past time to get it back. We had moments where we were gashing A&M Saturday night pretty good out of a fairly traditional I set, but then went back to the zone read option, which isn’t really an option when Martinez is hurt or out of the game.
If Martinez isn’t 100%, we need to pull waaaaay back on the shotgun read and use far more pro and I-set offense. Otherwise we’re just running sideways with a QB who can’t cut upfield, and the defense knows it can handle the running back without worrying about the keeper doing much damage. Wats is just too smart for his own good sometimes – it feels like if he’s not getting the yards we need with the plays he wants, he’ll sacrifice the win for the sake of the offensive style. I know that’s hyperbole, of course – Wats wants to win as much as anyone. But dammit, if your speedy qb is gimpy, and his backup isn’t able to run the full offense, then put it on the shoulders of the guys who obviously have the ability to carry the team and just ride them to victory. Helu, Burkhead, McNeill, Reed, Paul, Kinnie – get the ball into their hands and take the questionable element (Martinez’ ankle and Green’s…um…whatever) out of the equation entirely.
Dammit, now I’m angry again. We’re better than this, Wats – come on!
"...when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to."
— Martin Luther
Coaching and the offense
was certainly not at its best in this one. Adjustments were not made. What ones needed to be made after Taylor went down I don’t have a clue, but not making any didn’t work. Or the ones they did make damn sure didn’t.
Aggie observation
From an outside point of view: Your coach totally lost his cool. He was so out of his mind over the officiating that he lost his team. As an Aggie fan, I sat in disbelief at all the penalties going our way, but more import was that it was obvious your coach was gone. If I were a Huskerfan, that would chap me the most.
by Roscoe Truck on Nov 26, 2010 9:09 PM CST up reply actions
More completely unsourced rumoring
from a friend. Who may or may not have the information correct, but he does know a guy who knows a guy, blah blah blah:
Guess the word on the street is that Martinez was ripping the offensive line when he came back onto the field and was texting his Dad complaining about them while he was in the locker room getting looked at. That was why Pelini was poking him in the chest. The Team voted to suspend him for one game, Martinez and his Dad said he would quit … Bo said OK … looks like they decided to accept the suspension and stay on the team. I guess Martinez’, with his Dad’s backing and interference have been raising cain all fall. Guess the Chancellor’s comments were to help protect Pelini from a suspension by the Big XII.. Let them know that something was being done… Anywho that is all I heard from the [name withheld to protect the innocent] rumor line this morning…
Whatever actually happened, I may try to listen live to the presser today. Then again, “The Office” makes me squirm, so the awkwardness in Lincoln might be too much for my delicate system.
"...when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to."
— Martin Luther
Hmmmm
Bo just said that Martinez isn’t suspended, and if he’s healthy, he’ll play Friday.
by Cheeseandcorn on Nov 22, 2010 11:35 AM CST up reply actions
Let Cody Green...
throw the ball! He is not Taylor Martinez. He cannot run the zone read offense. When you try to run that offense with Cody Green, the defense only has to key on whichever RB is in the game.
Either turn Green loose and let him throw or run the wildcat.
I’m talking to you Shawn Watson.
Cody Green sucks, period.
If Lee can’t or won’t play, Put Burkhead in wildcat and pound the ball. Having Cody Green pocket passing is and basically an automatic turnover – we’ve all seen it.
by HerpieHusker on Nov 22, 2010 10:54 AM CST up reply actions
Unfortunate
but true. Watching Cody play is like watching a giraffe learn to walk. It’s painful every… singe… time.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 10:55 AM CST up reply actions
Agree to a point, but....
have we seen enough to really know? My point was that Cody’s style does not equal Taylor’s. If he’s the only option then we have to do something different.
I see your point
I think he’d do well if he had more confidence (and stick’um). I think I’d go with the Wildcat.
Actually, I had a dream last night that they ran the wildcat during the CU game and Burkhead passed the ball to a wide open Kyler Reed…. but, overthrew him.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:02 AM CST up reply actions
It'll happen, just wait!
But really I agree with you. I think I’d prefer just running the wildcat and throwing it 20% of the time with Burkhead than having Green in at quarterback. Don’t get me wrong, he’s had a great attitude and I know he’s trying his best, but really what is he GOOD at?
Accuracy? Inconsistent at best.
Decision making? Pretty poor across the board
Mobility? No better than a one legged Martinez
Ball security? Well, he catches at least 80% of the snaps!
He does have great arm strength but that’s literally the only strength I can think of right now.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
All I know is that
anytime that god damn ball touches Cody’s hands, a turnover is imminent.
Wildcat = Damage Control
by HerpieHusker on Nov 22, 2010 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
At one point this season
Cody Green was the number two QB and Pelini was putting him in just to give him game experience in case TM got hurt. Not sure what has changed.
I, for one, welcome Rex Burkhead as our new quarterback overlord.
Reporter: "What would it take to get you to spend three or four days outside, on concrete?"
Joe Paterno: "Depends what she looks like."
When you run the zone read with Cody Green
the defense only has to key on where the ball ends up on the ground.
by George W. Beadle on Nov 22, 2010 11:46 AM CST up reply actions
And then the
“normal” (read- completely excusable) nut punching ensues.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:48 AM CST up reply actions
Hmmm
Let’s face it, NU’s offense is no better than last years with the exception of Martinez
From a lay perspective, yes. However, inaccurate. W/o TM the team closed out a Top10 Mizzou team in the second half against a really good defense, won an OT game at ISU by scoring 31 points, and moved the ball adequately enough w/o TM in the aTm game (penalties killed a number of drives that Cody Green was in for). I argue that they’re better but, not by much. We’ve actually got a chance this year if the players execute and don’t shoot themselves in the foot. Last year, we held the ball, ran ISOs, punted it 50+ yards, and hoped our defense would outscore the other team’s offense.
As far as the behavior, the only thing I didn’t like was touching TM. Keep in mind that the camera only showed Bo’s bad moments. It didn’t show any coaching he did on the sidelines. …it’s just not good TV.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 10:54 AM CST reply actions
you scored 24 points in one quarter against Missouri
with a healthy Martinez to free up space for Helu.
You scored 7 in 2/3 of a game after Martinez got injured. Martinez isn’t the whole offense, but he’s the biggest part.
I don't know why
But I’m getting this sinking feeling that we’re headed for a crushing loss on Friday. We’re distracted, we’re beat up, there could very well be big time unity problems internally, and we probably won’t get a fair shake from the refs again (I’m not alleging conspiracy, just resigning myself to the fact that Bo is hated enough by the officials that we’re going to get screwed more times than not).
Colorado on the other hand is on a roll. They are not an untalented team, just one that has been underachieving greatly. They match up well, have a strong downhill running game, and a seasoned veteran at qb who for all the grief he’s taken isn’t a bad quarterback. They’re unified, and there’s absolutely no evidence to suggest that they won’t play like crazy in Lincoln on Saturday.
To be honest, I’m terrified.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
And
Colorado always plays Nebraska tight, regardless of the year, players, talent, ranking, etc.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:03 AM CST up reply actions
If we don't show up ready to play
I’m not sure it’ll be all that tight.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
I couldn't agree more.
Huskers will have to play their best game of the season to win this one. Sounds crazy, but unfortunately it’s true.
I'm not concerned ith Friday's game
In fact, I feel a certain level of empathy for the Buffs for having to play them after such a disappointing loss.
I REALLY hope you're right
Because basically we’re banking on negative energy > positive energy for this game.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
Apparently
Bo has scheduled a press conference for sometime between 11 and 1pm today. Wonder what it has to do with.
It's the regular weekly press conference.
Just moved to Monday since the game is on Friday this week. That having been said, “aaaaawkwaaaaard.”
"...when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to."
— Martin Luther
Ok good....
Wow, starting to buy into my own paranoia there for a moment.
Anyone agree....
that maybe Pelini brought Martinez back before he was ready? I’m starting to think maybe sitting him against Kansas as well may have been the best move.
Perhaps
but, I think the rationale was good. Needed to get him back into the speed of the game before the aTm game. I think the most unfortunate aspect was his reinjury.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:22 AM CST up reply actions
I don't think Pelini wanted Martinez to come in cold
Besides he seemed to be just fine before that fluke (I don’t know how else to describe your own lineman stepping on an already injured ankle) injury. Many things could have changed the course of the game. Beyond the officials’ asshattery, Martinez not getting hurt would have been a difference maker as well.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
On LJS
getting ready to watch the Press Conference
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:19 AM CST reply actions
Bo seems
upbeat but apologetic. Says the administration is behind him 100%, says that all the rumors floating around about his and TMs exchange are inaccurate.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:31 AM CST reply actions
Says
TM was excused from a “team shakeout” yesterday. It was not a mandatory team meeting.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:32 AM CST reply actions
Kind of like how he was excused from fall camp earlier with
the same amount of speculation from fans and awkwardness form Pelini?
by George W. Beadle on Nov 22, 2010 11:49 AM CST up reply actions
No
he said it’s pretty routine.. Cited a few other players who’d been excused in recent weeks.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:51 AM CST up reply actions
The PI on Dennard was the correct call
His arm was going across Fuller’s arms, so Fuller was trying to push his arm away. He was trying to free himself up to make the catch. It was the correct call.
Go away troll!
That PI was bogus! Fuller was holding on the Dennard.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:36 AM CST up reply actions
No it wasn't
Fuller was pulling Dennard around to get at the ball. Dennard played it fine. Hell, even Herbstreet during the broadcast said it was offensive pass interference.
Watch the reply, not the still photo.
"Don't know"
If Taylor will play Friday. If healthy, will he play Friday? “Yeah”
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:34 AM CST reply actions
On if he embarassed the state/program
“I hope [people] look at what you’ve done over a period of time. [I] hope they’re in [my] corner. If I’ve embarrassed anybody- I’m sorry.”
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:38 AM CST reply actions
On Carl's camera incident
Carl was going to protect a player from an Aggie fan behind the camera guy. He walked into the camera on his way and he regrets breaking the guys camera.. Bo has talked to the player and Carl..
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:40 AM CST reply actions
That's just a bad excuse
He was definitely going for the camera: http://texags.com/main/forum.reply.asp?topic_id=1739612&forum_id=5
I feel shame for linking to TexAgs, but it seemed apropos.
undefeated in Sun Belt play
Yeah..
because there was a brick wall behind the camera guy, it’s impossible to think that anything else was going on in the background.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 1:25 PM CST up reply actions
There must have been a brick wall there considering Carl stopped and grabbed the camera man when he got there.
If you look at the latter pictures, it’s tough to claim Carl was attempting to walk past the guy when he accidentally bumped into him, stopped, and tried to grab something.
undefeated in Sun Belt play
Not defending Carl
because he is the coach and should have composure, but it is a little strange the audio has been disable from all of the videos rendering what was being yelled at him only able to be presented by biased sources. Carl should be better than that but I think we know that Pelini’s are easily provoked and create quite the target for someone trying to create drama and drive up web traffic on their site. I wonder what the full story is.
by George W. Beadle on Nov 22, 2010 2:01 PM CST up reply actions
Ok
After seeing the stills, I agree- he accosted the guy.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 10:00 PM CST up reply actions
Pretty damning evidence
But having read TexAgs and listened to their insane, hyperventilating radio coverage of the incident Saturday night, I wouldn’t put a PhotoShop job or very selective posting of evidence past them.
That being said, um, it’d take quite a homer to say that those photos look anything but bad for Carl.
by Cheeseandcorn on Nov 22, 2010 3:27 PM CST up reply actions
I am
quite the homer but the pictures look bad. The video, not so much. But, after seeing the pics… different story.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 10:02 PM CST up reply actions
nebraska never wrong
guess you guys can’t believe two different camera from two different angles. wow what losers!
If TM can't play
Cody Green would be the starter. Zac Lee is still injured. Zac WAS available Saturday if needed.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:43 AM CST reply actions
On if the B12 is out to get Nebraska
Lots of silence…. No, uh- I don’t know… I can’t even speculate on something like that… that’s pretty far out there..
Sounds like some question in Bo’s mind also.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:44 AM CST reply actions
Gomes
Pelini yelling at the players has a positive impact. The passion moves the players. It drives them to compete at the highest level.
A coach that’s strictly a “coaches coach” you may not give it your all like you would coach Pelini.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:52 AM CST reply actions
coplete idiot
If you go to big time program you will not see a trogalyte like Pelini, but then it is Nebraska. Seriously no one has a guy like him. Even in the SEC! The Big Ten will be less accomadating.
What goes through your mind
He’s not in your face for no reason. He sees the potential and he knows you can execute. He wants to win like the rest of us.
On focusing…
You know at Nebraska there’s a lot of focus, it’s expected, there’s been more this week but you have to zone it out and prepare for Friday.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 22, 2010 11:55 AM CST reply actions
Journal Star website is streaming it
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
The Real Problem- Shawn Watson
Here’s the deal, our offense really hasn’t gotten that much better since last year, despite returning almost everyone. The fumbles, the penalties, the poor execution…all 2009 all over again. We just got tricked at first because of a couple of good games against crappy defenses.
Watson has had his chance to “open the playbook” so to speak, and he hasn’t done it. I don’t think his playbook is as deep as everyone thinks. The man doesn’t offer hardly any creativity in play calling and when his game plan gets stopped by an opposing defense, he is horrible at adjusting. It’s time to fire Shawn Watson. Seriously, Bo cannot afford to hold onto him for another season. I don’t care how well our offense does the rest of the season. The fact is if our offense could execute even half decently most of the time, rather than good at times and horrible at others…we would have contended for the national title last year and we’d probably be 11-0 this year!
FIRE WATSON!!!
I normally agree with you
But now isn’t one of those times. The Texas game was an example of our coaches (Watson) putting our players in a position to succeed, only to have them drop the ball. OSU was nothing short of the offense saving our skins. ISU, KU, and TAMU all involved an injured Taylor Martinez, and an injured Zac Lee. I’d LOVE to see how effective most offenses could be if their #1 and #2 quarterbacks went down or were at least severely impaired by injury.
Regarding play calling, I don’t know what people want to see “open up.” TMart isn’t in the condition to execute much of anything right now, and Cody Green is a turnover waiting to happen. To me, Saturday’s performance looked like Watson realized we weren’t going to light up A&M with a hobbled Martinez and pulled the offense into a shell so the defense could try to win the game.
The penalties ARE inexcusable, but I tend to point the blame there more to the position coaches….namely Cotton. The offensive line was terrible in all aspects Saturday, in a game where we desperately needed them to shine. If one coach needs to be fired, I think it needs to be Cotton. I don’t have too many beefs with Shawn Watson.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
I agree
except for one thing. If they were going to pull into a shell, why not put Burkhead back into wildcat just like the ISU game and then you have your 2 best offensive weapons in the backfield. Tell your O-Line to suck it up and make it happen. This is the tact I would have taken once TMart was obviously not going to be healthy enough to win the game.
I absolutely agree with that
And its definitely a legitimate critique. I think the Wildcat would have been better than Green when TMart went down.
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
I don't like Watson
But I’m leaning ever so slightly toward jdhusker on this one. What happened when the Huskers did open the playbook and take some chances against A&M?
1) Interception
2) Interception
by Cheeseandcorn on Nov 22, 2010 3:30 PM CST up reply actions
I'm willing to give everyone another year at least (because I have so much control over the situation, you know...).
Cotton, in particular, had a fairly empty cupboard when he arrived, and O lines are often the last part of any program to fully gel. Remember: the great Tenopir/Young lines in the 90s had often been playing together for two or three years before getting significant playing time as juniors and seniors. I’m not overjoyed by how the line has played recently, but we’re starting a redshirt freshman at LT, two juco transfers at guard, an undersized warrior at center and lost our most experienced tackle before the season even started. If we’re two or three years down the road and these problems are still there, then it’s time to make a change, but this staff hasn’t had the chance to put it all together with their own players and system just yet.
"...when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to."
— Martin Luther
I voted for
Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Throughout the game we had our chances to win and failed. Ultimately we opened the door for a single bad call to allow TAMU to finish a drive with a game winning FG. Had we scored from the 15 instead of tying the game, we probably would have won. You can make the argument that they might have scored a TD to win, but I would say, that we probably would have kept them from the end zone. That is why I am giving the woulda, coulda, shoulda. We had the offense capable of scoring, but didn’t execute.
Yup
That’s what it comes down to, right there. Gotta score some points if you want to win football games.
by Cheeseandcorn on Nov 22, 2010 3:31 PM CST up reply actions
Guess who's announcing the Husker game on Friday?
I’d write his name here, but there’s just no place for that in this thread.
Looks like I picked the wrong week to give up amphetamines...
"...when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to."
— Martin Luther
More fuel to the conspiracy fire...
I just saw stats indicating we have not had a holding call go in our favor for over 4 games! Around 275 plays with no offensive holding calls in favor of our D! Amazing!
Hold Watson accountable....Helu & Burkhead need carries
Yes, the o-line is frustrating, but let’s look at the numbers and put more of the blame on Watson….Burkhead averaged 5.6 a carry and Helu 5.7 a carry, both better than A&M’s Gray, who was the offensive star of the game…but Gray had 4 more carries than Burkhead and Helu combined. Case in point: after Burkhead’s runs move us down the field in the 4th, what does Watson start calling when we get in scoring range? Not more carries for the running backs. Meanwhile, A&M kept calling Gray’s number in the 4th.
Good point.
I’m getting less and less enamored with the shotgun read the longer the season progresses. With Martinez hurt we don’t seem to have the speed to make that one-on-one move that sort of play requires to bust it long. I’ve said it before here, but it bears repeating: a simplified offense shouldered by the offensive line, Burkhead and Helu might be our best bet for the remainder of the season, especially if we can get more physical at the point of attack.
"...when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to."
— Martin Luther





























