Report Card: Huskers 20, Kansas Jayhawks 3
It wasn't the blowout that the oddsmakers predicted. Lots of reasons why: Taylor Martinez isn't anywhere near 100% (no matter what the coaching staff tries to suggest), Nebraska didn't want to make Turner Gill look bad, and frankly, Nebraska didn't play that well offensively. But it is what it is: a victory in a game that, frankly, Nebraska never was in danger of losing.
That's because the Blackshirts were in complete domination of Kansas. The Jayhawks' only were able to generate four first downs on their own, and the three points they scored were more the fault of the offense turning the ball over than anything the defense did wrong. So this week's report card is going to look a bit manic-depressive, with some very good and some very-no-so-good grades. As always, your feedback is welcome as well.
QB: Martinez may have been healthy enough to play, but he wasn't healthy enough to make the plays that make him special. That being said, I think it was a good idea to play him, because it gave him a chance to play the game in a different way. Shawn Watson tried to have him become more of a "game manager" than a "game changer". Granted, that came with mixed results. I saw some really nice passes, and some really ugly ones. That's to be expected; he's a freshman. What concerns me more is the continuing ball security problems. That's something that should be a priority this offseason. Grade: C-RB: The numbers don't look that bad, but put it in perspective. Kansas ranks 11th in the Big XII in rushing defense, and Nebraska should have been able to run the ball at will against the Jayhawks. Some of that was poor blocking, some of that was poor decision making. So putting it in that context, the backs earn a D+.
WR: Niles Paul took a lot of abuse last week from some fans for his decision to return a kickoff from deep out of the end zone. This week, fans should sing his praises, because he had several clutches to keep drives alive, including a leaping reception on third and 25 to get the first down. Great throw and catch for both. That third and 25 was set up by a pass interference penalty on Brandon Kinnie that I'd like to get a third look at, because I didn't see anything to warrant a flag on the first replay I saw. Grade: B+
OL: I just expected the line to line up and blow the Jayhawks off the ball, but that didn't seem to happen. Most of the yards seemed to come on the outside. Grade: D+
DL: Jared Crick spent so much time in the Kansas backfield, he qualifies for student tuition in Lawrence. The four man line was disruptive enough to keep Kansas in neutral all evening long. Grade: A
LB: Lavonte David set the tone for the evening when he snuffed out a KU screen pass on third down. Ho hum, another 10 tackle performance. Will Compton also had a nice game as well. Grade: A
Secondary: Alfonzo Dennard's interception was a thing of beauty. Dejon Gomes was all over the place as well. The rest of the secondary had a quiet night on the scoresheet because they pretty much blanketed the KU receivers. Grade: A
Special Teams: The good was watching Alex Henery pin the Jayhawks deep with his punting. The bad was watching D.J. Beshears return five kickoffs for 139 yards (almost 28 yards a return). Grade: C-
Overall: C+ It's a win, but it was a sloppy win on offense and special teams. That worked this week against Kansas; it'll take a much better effort next week against Texas A&M.
Elsewhere in College Football
Colorado B+ Maybe Brian Cabral knows what it takes to win in Boulder.
Texas F Wow. Simply. wow.
Wisconsin A+ 83 points??? Okay...but was that RUTS or not?
Oregon: C+ Ok, there's your offweek.
Utah: F Didn't you used to be a Top Ten team?
Cam Newton: D- I think there's too much smoke here for there not to be a fire. Auburn tradition isn't exactly helping here either.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The grades
are fair. It was a 17 point margin of victory; so, it was a pretty good win compared to others in the Top 10. I wonder if the score would have been 31-17 would Nebraska have gotten more love in the polls?
Wisconsin: Definitely RUTS, no question.
by HuskerINtheArmy on Nov 14, 2010 7:57 PM CST reply actions
I don't think so
Nebraska could only have lost ground with that Kansas game – by just barely escaping with a win. Even if they’d have won by 50, they wouldn’t have seen much poll love as a result.
by Cheeseandcorn on Nov 14, 2010 8:39 PM CST up reply actions
I just cannot figure this O-line out
Anybody else able to make some sense of their play this year?
They look like one of the best lines in the country against terrible defenses like Washington, K-State, and Oklahoma State, as well as one really good D-line (Missouri). They look like absolute crap against a strong D-line (Texas) but also terrible D-lines, too (South Dakota St., Kansas). Does that just mean they’re average?
Yes.
I think Nebraska is much closer to average than the 9-1 record shows. However, I do think they have the tools to be a very good team, but they aren’t doing something right at the moment. (and no, we can’t passively blame the injuries)
by HerpieHusker on Nov 14, 2010 8:54 PM CST up reply actions
CottonBall
We had CottonBall in 2003 and it was lousy; its back. BC prides himself in making pigs ears out of silk.
I look
at Ricky Henry…. a lot. He’s wonderful when he’s on… but if the defense does something different (like God forbid blitz a linebacker), he’s just hit or miss.
Bottom line – Henry is a good lineman, but not very smart.
Right tackles – okay, the Jones duo, but not very fast. I hoped they’d get better about that, but no.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Nov 15, 2010 7:31 PM CST up reply actions
See, this kind of makes me glad I don't have DVR
If I did, I’d be rewatching games over and over, taking notes on each of the linemen and writing detailed breakdowns for this site. And then I’d have to kick my own butt for extreme nerdiness, right before my wife ripped me out for the same reason.
by Cheeseandcorn on Nov 15, 2010 9:09 PM CST up reply actions
"If I did, I’d be rewatching games over and over, taking notes on each of the linemen and writing detailed breakdowns for this site. "
Wait, is there something wrong with that???
by aggiegirl2005 on Nov 16, 2010 10:46 AM CST up reply actions
Only thing holding Nebraska back is consistency. They need to learn to come out and play every game like they played during the Missouri, K-State, and Washington games. I think part of it is because Pelini likes leaning on his defense so much that he doesn’t want the offense to lose a game. So he’s quicker to pull the reins on the offense.
by whateveritis12 on Nov 15, 2010 12:18 AM CST reply actions
I agree
Seems like as long as his defense is playing lights out he is fine with everything else. I didn’t watch the Kansas game. But did they ever try to throw the ball deep? I know Niles is inconsistent but I have seen him outrun almost every team Nebraska plays over his career. Would love to see us go deep to him at least 2 or 3 times per game. 6 punts against the Jayhwaks Uhhhhhhh what the hell. Air the effin ball out on 1st or second down, we got the talent to do so. The worst thing that happens is they pick it oh well its 50 yards down the field.
by justtruckin on Nov 15, 2010 12:06 PM CST up reply actions




























