Report Card: Nebraska 31, Missouri Tigers 17
Ah, nothing like a victory over a ranked team to get those feel-good emotions going well. It was a dominating performance by the Huskers, who came out of the tunnel motivated and ready to play. Add in some classic Gary Pinkel playcalling, and the stage was set for a big first quarter. Pinkel seems to subscribe to Bill Callahan's "We take what we want" metaphor. One week after gashing the Oklahoma Sooners with a inside running game, Pinkel elected to take on the 75th-against-the-run Blackshirts with no-back, five receiver formations to start the game.
End of the first quarter: Nebraska 24, Missouri 0. Whoops. Score one for the Pinkel Factor.
Hard to say whether a different offensive game plan would have made much difference today. Certainly, the Tigers didn't have an answer for Roy Helu today, who' was named the Walter Camp national offensive player of the week for his performance against the Tigers. That's two in a row for the Huskers, as Taylor Martinez won the same award last week.
So now comes the grading, and boy, is this a lot more enjoyable to do this week after a big win. As always, your comments and feedback are always encouraged.
QB: Taylor Martinez showed some of the same touch he displayed last week, especially on that 40 yard touchdown pass to Kyler Reed. Martinez does need to work on his pocket protection; he could learn a trick or two from Blaine Gabbert about throwing the ball out of bounds once he's out of the pocket and is facing a sack. Grade: BRB: 307 yards rushing for Roy Helu. Helu's three touchdowns were impressively blocked, but what struck me the most on the replays was how Helu literally ran past the Missouri secondary like they were defensive linemen. Add in some tough running in the fourth quarter to seal the victory, and you've got an A+ performance.
WR: They weren't asked to do much in the passing game, but they made the catches this week. Most importantly, they helped plow the field for Helu's big runs. So I'll give them an A.
OL: It all starts up front, and these guys created huge holes for Helu. ESPN highlighted their work that helped spring Helu on his 73 yard touchdown run near the end of the first quarter. Grade: A+
DL: The front four manhandled the Missouri offensive line, just like last year, and sent Blaine Gabbert running for cover. You don't think that Gabbert isn't secretly glad that the Huskers are leaving for the Big Ten after this season? Grade: A+
LB: Nebraska played mostly dime, as Missouri's running game never made the travel roster. Lavonte David did have a couple of sacks, and did his best to handle Michael Egnew. Grade: B
Secondary: What can you say about this group? They locked down on the Missouri receivers, and didn't give them much of an opportunity to catch the ball. True freshman Ciante Evans came in early on after Alfonzo Dennard suffered a concussion, and played like a veteran. Courtney Osborne and Austin Cassidy played well as well in their first significant playing time. All in all, a solid A.
Overall: A solid victory against an conference opponent getting national recognition. Highlight reel plays, and a nice bump in the rankings. That earns the Huskers an A in my book.
Elsewhere in College Football
Texas: F We've been there ourselves and watched the wheels fall off a season (2007). There is an underlying soap opera that's going to take place at the end of the season, in all likelihood.
Baylor: A The Dr. Pepper was flowing free in Waco last night.
Iowa: A Nice comeback for the Squawkeyes after a tough loss at home the week before.
Texas A&M: B Also a nice turnaround after making a quarterback change.
Iowa State: B- What does it say about the state of things when the Cyclones aren't happy with the size of their halftime lead against Kansas?
Elsewhere Around Memorial Stadium
Dairy Store Ice Cream: A- I had never tried it before, but as I had gotten to the stadium early to deliver tickets to Jon, I had some extra time to kill. And since the afternoon was warmer than expected, all of a sudden I was reminded that I had been meaning to try the Dairy Store based on recommendations from our "Best of Nebraska" series. So I wandered over through the student section and into the East Stadium and picked up some chocolate. Very good ice cream. They really should sell this at all the concession stands.
Costumes: B+ With it being Halloween weekend, some people decided to dress up for the game. Most of them weren't very creative, but the guys dressed up as Pooh and Tigger caught my eye. They had to be sweltering in the first half. Afterwards, I caught them leaving the stadium with their girlfriends, who weren't in costume. I have to believe that those two guys lost a bet.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree with every one of your grades this week.
Both lines were on the top of their games and Roy Helu was amazing. I was really impressed with the way Evans stepped in, and the safeties played well also. I don’t remember any dropped passes, so the WRs get an A in my book too.
Extend Jared Dudley!
Can you believe
Evans is only a true frosh? Whoa, that kid’s a gamer.
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.
Texas
might be 2002 NU, not 2007. I don’t think Mack is the problem – but there will likely be staff changes at the end of the season. I think Muschamp’s safe for now, but at the same time, he might not stick around when other jobs open up this winter. Greg Davis = Craig Bohl, unfortunately for him – hopefully Davis, if he is let go, finds a good landing zone wherever he goes.
"...when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to."
— Martin Luther
What
goes around comes around hard to feel sorry for Texas.
Missouri and the long ball
Five times in the game on Saturday, a Missouri receiver had a step on a Nebraska defensive back and Gabbert overthrew them (once Prince actually stripped a caught ball in the end zone). Is making two of these five plays — which would have completely changed the game — asking too much or is Gabbert simply not too hot at the deep ball? Obviously there is nothing to do about Prince’s play, but there were other opportunities. What do you guys think about those misses, bad luck or bad play?
I don't know all that much about Gabbert to be honest
I know a lot of the Mizzou fans that act like he’s the second coming of Christ, and I’m sure you’ll give me a little more insight as to whether or not he usually completes that pass..judging by his completion percentages (pre-nebraska) he should have completed them, cause I think he was around 70% (though admittedly I don’t know if he threw the deep ball alot)..another thing I think you have to keep in mind on those particular plays is that the Nebraska got more pressure on Gabbert than anyone else had all season (by far), and sometimes when a QB hasn’t seen that type of pressure, it has an extremely adverse affect on the ball thrown…to answer your original question, I feel the same way about those missed passes as I did when we had the dropsies against Texas, it probably would have changed the game completely, but it didn’t…we still have a loss to Texas and you still have a loss to Nebraska.
I dunno
Deep pass plays to the corner of the end zone are low-percentage plays for a reason – there’s a lot of different places where the play can go wrong. They’re very tough plays to execute, especially on a top-notch secondary.
Should Missouri have completed one of those? Probably. Two? That’s a bit much to ask. If we expected QBs/WRs to complete a long pass every time they had a step on their man, we’d be expecting 59-52 games every week.
by Cheeseandcorn on Nov 1, 2010 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions
On the one hand,
we were upset at our own receivers for dropping passes against Texas, and commented on how that would have changed the game. On the other hand, the passes NU dropped, with one exception, were wide open, while NU generally had good coverage on MU Saturday. Lots of “could’ve, should’ve” either way – and in the final analysis, the only thing that matters is what DID happen, not what might have happened.
"...when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to."
— Martin Luther
I'm glad Helu
was able to put his stamp on the game, and really his career at NU. Although he may not be recognized by the national media for his level of talent, this was one of those games that will ensure he’ll be remembered by local fans for a long time to come.
Not only is it hard to feel sorry for Texas, but with each loss it becomes more frustrating to know the Huskers let a real opportunity for an undefeated season slip away in that game. No “we shoulda won” excuses, but really… we shoulda won!!!!
No officiating score this week?
I would give them a D+, mostly because of the missed fumble for TD call on the Gabbert sack. How can you give a QB forward progress on a SACK?
never in my wildest dreams...would I have thought this possible.

by Ceek on Nov 1, 2010 9:34 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I swore...
that was going to have been written by an NU fan until I saw the user info box.
*Side note – the word “classy” is no longer indexed in my vocabulary.
See
This discussion. I dunno – it just seems a little odd to me for the fans of the winning team to spend the next few days talking about officiating. There were other, much more consequential, elements of the game to discuss, in my mind.
by Cheeseandcorn on Nov 1, 2010 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree we shouldn't dwell on it
I just think we should all consider the more nefarious aspects of this call, even though we won the game…guess I’m just a bitter person.
Pinkel is dwelling on it...
not the fumble, but Osborne’s hit on Gabbert. The MU coach has asked the Big XII to review it.
saw that..
it would seem he’s a little bitter about the loss, I can see him hoping for something to be done..but to send it to the league office (even after I watched it appx 100 times) seems a bit over-the-top to me..hopefully the big 12 will adjust the score to give us that td they robbed.
I don't take issue with a coach sending a play for review,
I’m pretty sure that is a common practice of most teams in the Big 12 when they feel it is warranted, but I do take issue with him commenting about it to the press. I know that opposing fans (if not the league office) would bemoan Pelini if he ever comments publicly about officiating.
by George W. Beadle on Nov 1, 2010 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm tempted to get down on Nebraska
For failing to put Missouri away until only a few minutes left in the fourth quarter, but I think that if Martinez would have been healthy in the second half (and if we would have gotten the ball after the half), Nebraska would have put the game away much sooner.
As soon as they knew Martinez was out, Nebraska’s entire goal on offense changed – from “pile up points to bury them” to “control the ball and bleed the clock.” And they executed that new goal almost to perfection. (The seven straight MU third-down conversions in the third quarter certainly threw a wrench into that, though at least we made Mizzou take tons of time to get down the field.)
If you define a dominating performance in terms of accomplishing your goals nearly all the time you have the ball, then I’d say we were pretty dominating on offense. And on defense, Gabbert’s passes and the receivers’ catches had to be nearly perfect for them to move the ball on us (except for those freaking scrambles), so I’m inclined to say we were pretty impressive on that side of the ball, too.
Barney Cotton takes a lot of grief,
I think mostly unjustified, but those guys played great on the O-line on Saturday. In the 4th quarter, everybody knew what was coming, and it still worked.
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.
Can we grade the crowd?
I was in the crowd, and I’d give us an A+. It was amazing, we were yelling at the top of our longues every single time Missouri had the ball. WE WERE NEVER QUIET! And all that talk of no home-field advantage at Memorial Stadium is completely gone today. I think that the crowd is a big reason Missouri had to use all their timeouts in the 3rd quarter and that’s what led to the total domination of time of possession in the 4th quarter (we had it for over 13 minutes and they had it for less than 2). It was awesome, and I was so lucky to be a part of it. Go Big Red! Keep winning!
by Billgrip on Nov 1, 2010 11:51 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Anyone need a quick laugh?
Ed Cunningham’s wikipedia page, looks like someone has taken a few liberties with it.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
For whatever reason, he enjoys calling out Nebraska players for hits he feels are illegal but in reality are very legal. Never mind the fact that the refs aren’t throwing flags on these hits either. He makes Brent Musburger seem fair and knowledgeable.
He also has had a deep thigh bruise in his career and felt obligated to mention it 27 times on his last broadcast. In conclusion, Ed seems to be squeamish that football is actually a contact sport. Ed proudly carries the torch of soft play where participation ribbons are as good as victory in his book.
@GochFaceKiller on Twitter
by Screwface on Nov 1, 2010 3:00 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
excellent!
During the week, when not announcing games from high upon his stallion, Cunningham can be found handing out blue participation ribbons at your local public school, as well as calling out all other football announcers with skills superior to his as “big meanies.”
Likes: Flowers, long walks on the beach, Downy soft clothes and real football (Soccer).
Dislikes: Rough and tough contact and the nasty, violent game of football.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com




























