Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jon Jones Arrested on Suspicion of DUI

Corn Flakes: Rocking the Monday

Yep another Corn Flakes this week  for you faithful followers of the Corn.

Northworstern_medium

She's digging it. (Or is this MORE COWBELL!)
via 30fps.mocksession.com - (Hat tip to Dr Sat)

 

Oklahoma State 41 - Nebraska 51, Quick postgame thoughts - Cowboys Ride For Free

Judging by the comments many of you have headed over there to talk with the Jaundice Cowboy faithful.

Rivals.com College Football - Experts: Week 8 awards, what we learned

Missouri has arrived. The Tigers' 36-27 win against an Oklahoma team that ranked No. 1 in the BCS standings is further proof of Mizzou's lofty stature. This team is the total package, featuring a deadly offense led by Heisman-contending QB Blaine Gabbert along with the most underrated defense in the nation. A win Saturday at Nebraska will be another huge step for Missouri toward the Big 12 North title, as it marches toward perhaps even greater heights. Is Gary Pinkel the national coach of the year?

Didn't they arrive a few years ago? Remember that Chase guy? Chance at a B12 Title? OU wrecked it? Ring a bell? Can you arrive more than once, or did they leave and arrive again?

Rivals.com College Football - Week 9 Watch: No kings of the road

Best coordinator chess match: Nebraska offensive coordinator Shawn Watson vs. Missouri defensive coordinator Dave Steckel. Nebraska is coming off an impressive 51-point outing at Oklahoma State. But the Cowboys' are sieve-like on defense, and it's the preceding game -- the one the Huskers lost to Texas -- that has to worry Watson. Missouri's defense is much closer to Texas' than to Oklahoma State's. Steckel, who doubles as Mizzou's linebacker coach, has gotten high-level play from a unit that lacks star power. Mizzou's linebackers, headed by Andrew Gachkar, have to stand up to the Huskers' option-based attack. Huskers QB Taylor Martinez is coming off a passing performance that saw him throw five TD passes, so will Watson be willing to air it out early?

Ohhhhh the intrigue of it all.

Notes: Paul had extra set of eyes - Omaha.com

Niles Paul had a little help from Oklahoma State on his 100-yard kickoff return Saturday during the first quarter of Nebraska’s 51-41 win. Help, actually, from OSU’s video board mounted high atop the east end zone. As Paul raced past midfield, a group of Cowboys closed. But Paul found an extra burst to pull away — almost like he had eyes in the back of his head. "I did have eyes behind me," Paul said, "because I was looking at the screen."

He was looking at the screen, as he's running it back? I'm not sure how to feel about that.

Scout.com: Who's Not ... The Week 8 List Of Duds

4. The Oklahoma State Pass Defense No matter how potent RB Kendall Hunter and the rest of the offense is this year, it’ll have a hard time overcoming that leaky Cowboy secondary. Oklahoma State has now yielded 18 touchdowns through the air after run-first Nebraska QB Taylor Martinez burned them five times. That’s the same Martinez who’d thrown just three scoring strikes all year.

Remember people, it's because they are bad, not cause you are good.

Scout.com: CFN Rankings - No. 1 to 120 - Week 8

14. Nebraska 6-1

Seems about right.

Husker-Iowa State Game Set for ABC Regional Telecast - Huskers.com - Nebraska Athletics Official Web Site

The Big 12 Conference announced on Monday that Nebraska's Nov. 6 game at Iowa State in Ames will be televised regionally on ABC with kickoff set for 2:30 p.m. CT.

The reverse mirror had better work for this one. You here me ABC/ESPN? No one wants to watch anything from the Big East or ACC.

Scout.com: 10 Best Games of the Week - Week 8, 2010

@ #6 we have Nebraska. Well yay.

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Video

Watching the video screen is good strategy. It allows you to know when guys are gaining on you, and lets you knew when a juke is necessary. Guys have been using these boards the past few years to their benefit, and some teams only allegedly only show live action when their team has the ball.

by newbie34 on Oct 25, 2010 4:57 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I thought maybe he just wanted to see himself

I really had not heard of that before, interesting.

You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation

by JLew on Oct 25, 2010 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Watching the video screen...

Is what Randy Moss said made him so good in Minnesota. He would run “go” routes and watch the video screen for the ball so as to not tip off the defender.

@GochFaceKiller on Twitter

by Screwface on Oct 25, 2010 8:51 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

not scared
But the Cowboys’ are sieve-like on defense, and it’s the preceding game — the one the Huskers lost to Texas — that has to worry Watson.

Call me a homer if you must, but I still think dropped balls and our own mistakes cost us that game, if we make those catches, we’re number 2-3 in the country right now, it’s the same team.

by Ceek on Oct 25, 2010 5:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Ceek, if you are going to use that crutch, and apparently NU nation is, then we may as well Alabama, Ohio St, and Oklahoma to use it to. But for a few mistakes each of them would have been victorious too. But it was what it was; and it was a televised ass-whoopin’.

by AllThingsTen on Oct 25, 2010 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

cool story bro.

I don’t know how you can consider a 7 point loss that we were in a position to tie at the end of a game an “ass whoopin’”…and you’re right, but for a few mistakes all of those teams would have won, I don’t see what your point is here. You’re saying that it’s a crutch to say, “if we wouldn’t have made mistakes we would have won.”???

I was saying that simply because we cost ourselves (in my opinion before you freak out) that game, doesn’t mean we are any less capable of a team.

by Ceek on Oct 25, 2010 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

You Must Not

Have watched the MU/OU game….being out gained by 200 yards in the second half isn’t a mistake, being dominated in both sides of the LOS isn’t a mistake, having a 6’5" all-American defensive end jump into the air and intercept a pass isn’t a mistake. And if you want to call long kickoff returns and turnovers mistakes both OU and MU had plenty. OU was whipped, period.

by mpfische on Oct 25, 2010 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Read the stats analysis at Rock M Nation

http://www.rockmnation.com/2010/10/26/1772640/oklahoma-beyond-the-box-score

The statistics show damn near a deadlock. Mizzou ever so slightly outperformed Oklahoma in most areas, and won the turnover battle by one. That’s the decisive factor. Missouri played the better game and deserved the win, but it was very close. Certainly not a whipping.

by Tohoya on Oct 26, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dang!

Insert foot in mouth now.

by HuskerINtheArmy on Oct 26, 2010 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Arrival
Didn’t they arrive a few years ago? Remember that Chase guy? Chance at a B12 Title? OU wrecked it? Ring a bell? Can you arrive more than once, or did they leave and arrive again?

They arrived, delivered a pizza, then quickly left. The question is now (as it often is, for many teams), have they come back to stay?

Oh, wait, it was really Iowa St that delivered the pizza.

by Wolvie on Oct 25, 2010 5:52 PM CDT reply actions  

This comment...

“Missouri’s defense is much closer to Texas’ than to Oklahoma State’s.”

Um no, no its not, not even close. Texas’ D is lined with 5 star guys who played solid, fundamental fb against Nebraska. Mizzou’s D is lined with 3 and 4 star guys who are more consistent in their play than UT. Neb will be able to score in the upper 20s to 30s against Mizzou. Problem is that Mizzou’s O can probably score in the 30s on Nebraska’s D.

by meatybob on Oct 25, 2010 7:25 PM CDT reply actions  

cut back on the loco weed

having a stable full of 5 stars doesn’t mean they play like stars. And the fact is, they are playing like a stable of one or two stars. How else can you account for the fact this stable of studs that you love so much are not even ranked? Can you say: Iowa State?

by AllThingsTen on Oct 25, 2010 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm confused

as to what point you’re trying to make, are you saying that Mizzou’s D is better, or that Texas’s D is better?

by Ceek on Oct 25, 2010 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Star Ratings...really?!?!

Your going to use high school star ratings as a diagnostic tool on now college kids? Wow. To begin with, he said MU’s defense is closer to Texas’ than to OSU which is undeniable. I mean use your brain, OSU is giving up almost 31 pts a game in spite of playing WashSt, Troy, Tulsa, and LaLaf!!! Their schedule is good for the 61st toughest! Missouri, on the other hand, is allowing like 13pts per game while playing the country’s 30th toughest schedule. So that part of the argument is settled. As far as MU/UT and your star rating nonsense. Danario Alexander was a three star, Aldon Smith got three stars, it doesn’t mean anything…it’s all about how well you recruit talent. It plainly obvious this year, that MU’s defensive line is one of the best in the country, if you want to pretend it’s not suit yourself.

by mpfische on Oct 25, 2010 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

MU’s defensive line secondary is one of the best in the country

Fixed

@GochFaceKiller on Twitter

by Screwface on Oct 25, 2010 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

No

MU is top 10 in sacks….OU couldn’t run on them and they were in the backfield all night against, yes, four and five star recruits.

by mpfische on Oct 25, 2010 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

No?

Please explain how what you posted proved me wrong.

@GochFaceKiller on Twitter

by Screwface on Oct 25, 2010 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's not one or the other

Both parts of the Missouri defense have played exceptionally well, but the secondary thrives off of picks and solid tackling, but it does give up yards. But the def. Line particularly with A. Smith back is plain old dominant. Probably better than Texas’. U never said y you don’t think the d-line is one of the best…

by mpfische on Oct 25, 2010 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mizzou's d-line is great.

Definitely the best in the North. I just think Mizzou’s d-line, much like Nebraska’s last year, is reaping the benefits of a great secondary.

@GochFaceKiller on Twitter

by Screwface on Oct 25, 2010 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think that's at least somewhat accurrate

Mizzou’s defense on passing downs has been so good because we’ve been able to bring the house and trust that our CBs can often make the plays in single coverage. We’ve been able to get good pressure with just a 4-man rush, but more often than not, we’re bringing more and hoping that our secondary is good enough to stop em when the rush falls short.

by Tohoya on Oct 26, 2010 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oklahoma's two main RBs combined for over 100 yds rushing.

Finch average 6.6 yds/carry and Murray came in at a respectable 4.1. Obviously MU has a good DL and disrupted the play multiple times, hurrying and sacking the immobile Jones, but I think that the numbers show that OU COULD run the ball on MU, though it wasn’t in sieve-like fashion (read: Kansas State’s defense against Nebraska).

I think this game will be very tough for Nebraska. Missouri appears to have a defense for the first time in ages and Nebraska has a freshman QB who has only done well against porous defenses. Additionally, Nebraska doesn’t seem to have the same caliber of defense (really, they just don’t have Suh) and will find it difficult to pressure Gabbert. While I think that NU’s secondary can cover Missouri’s receivers, they can’t do it for 5-6 seconds every time Gabbert throws.

It will be an interesting match up of teams that both really want to beat the other for the last time in the foreseeable future. It should be fun.

by George W. Beadle on Oct 26, 2010 1:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes and No

(1) Murray had a run of 20 yards, you take that away and he had an anemic 29 yards on 11 carries for 2.6ypc.

(2) Finch is ill, he looks both stronger and fast than Murray, which is absolutely shocking.

by mpfische on Oct 26, 2010 5:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Again

You can’t just selectively not count the opponent’s big plays. Big plays are big plays for a reason – they mean the opponent did something very right and/or your team did something very wrong. You gotta count ’em when analyzing the stats to get the true picture of how your team (and the opponent) did.

by Cheeseandcorn on Oct 26, 2010 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not Necessarily True

If a running back has a 50 yard run and then gets 20 more yards on 12 carries it would be misleading to say, “He really ran the ball well.” A single big play can hide the truth about a otherwise poor performance.

by mpfische on Oct 26, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

It would be misleading to say "He ran the ball well throughout the game"

But that 50-yard run might have been more crucial to the game’s outcome than a bunch of 4- and 5-yard runs instead of 1- and 2-yarders.

It’d be at least as misleading to just pretend that 50-yard run didn’t happen or to put an asterisk on it.

by Cheeseandcorn on Oct 26, 2010 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

the defenses are fundementally different, by miles.

Do you really think that UCLA and ISU were able to move the ball because the UT defense is slow and non-athletic? No, it is because they were out of position, poor tacklers, and poor defensive fundamentals all around. Sorry Mizzou, but the players are your D athletically mirror OSU far more that even sniffing UT. Hell, Neb’s D far closer mirrors OSU’s D than UT in regards to athleticism. Mizzou is playing fundamentally good defense, they are not overly talented, but they are playing smart football.

People, I am not making a “better” vs. “worse” comparison, but pointing out differences in the defensive DNA. The Neb O was shut down because they faced an athletic defense that for the only game of the year, play smart. Good tackling, staying in lanes, etc. Sorry Mizzou, but Neb will be able to move the ball. Now Neb may kill themselves by fumbling or pass drops, but if the Neb O doesn’t make these mistakes, the offense will be fine.

by meatybob on Oct 26, 2010 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Give Me A Break

Maybe, just maybe, it wasn’t that Texas played a GREAT game against Nebraska and bad against UCLA and Iowa State, maybe Nebraska played its worst game against Texas?

Anyway…

All this “talent” and “athleticism” commentary stems from High School Star Ratings, which are a barometer of PERCEIVED skill. Once players get to college they’re either consistent with, better than or worse than their star rating. To suggest that just because Texas’ players have higher star rating that they have to be athletically superior is just plain old dumb. As Denario Alexander (3 star), Sean Weatherspoon (3 star), Aldon Smith (three star) and Danario Alexander (3 star) prove, the system isn’t all its cracked up to be.

Missouri’s domination on the LOI against Oklahoma is a perfect example of just how silly star ratings are. Of course, you’d have everyone believe that OU just had poor fundamentals as opposed to Missouri just being superior.

And no one said Nebraska won’t be able to move the ball, there is just a suggestion that the game will mirror your game against Texas a lot more than your game against OSU. I know you guys love Martinez, but he’s going to get pressured relentlessly by Missouri and he’s isn’t much of a spur of the moment passer. And to deny that Missouri is better at getting pressure than UT, is to deny reality.

But you keep on thinking Missouri has a bunch of “three star” players incapable of stopping Nebraska unless you make mistakes. We’ll see soon enough.

by mpfische on Oct 26, 2010 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

dude seriously

watch the games. You cannot disagree that the speed and size difference is real between a UT defense and between the other Big XII defenses. UT is plagued by LB’s out of alignment, poor tackling this week. Additionally, come on man, you cannot be serious claiming that OU played a great game. Wasn’t the long touchdown by Mizzou directly caused by TWO OU tacklers not wrapping up? How about the fumble earlier when OU was driving? BTW, OU still have over 400 yards against Mizzou, with 300 yards passing. Thats not exactly shutdown defense on Mizzou’s part.

You are crazy if you think that your team is full of Sam Achos like UT. You’re not, but your D is playing smarter than UTs. And Martinez will be fine. Hell, he was fine against UT. He had time, he just had 5 drops (and admittedly some fumbles) that killed drives. Pelini even admitted that he shouldn’t have pulled him.

All I said is that UT defense is more athletic/faster than Mizzou’s, something that 99% of the universe would probably agree with. I didn’t say they were better, I am just stating that its a different animal than what Neb faced against UT. I really have a hard time seeing how that isn’t sensible.

by meatybob on Oct 26, 2010 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mizzou fan here.

This game against Nebraska has been seen all year as the most important game of the season just going to give my 2 cents for what it’s worth. Our D has been THE reason that we are in the position that we’ve been this year, no way around it. It all starts with our D-coordinator, Dave Steckel. Last year was his first year, and was just trying to get the players to buy into his system, and have them get confidence in themselves really. Over the years, all of our fans have been complaining about our defense giving opposing offenses way, way waaaaaay too much cushion on defense, and finally this year, we have a couple experienced corners who he’s allowing to play some press coverage, and our D-line has really stepped up and been getting to the quarterback, allowing us to have 11 INT’s, 3 more than last year. I will say this though, the games where we struggled, we have played against experienced offensive lines (ie: SDSU who allowed their first sack of the season to us). To have a chance to win, we need our D-Line to step up. We really haven’t played anyone who employs a similar offensive attack along the lines of Nebraska in regards to a legit power rushing attack. Sheelhasse from Illinois ran wild on our D in the first half, but nothing in the second half, but that was once we loaded up the box, threw out a 4 DE line because we realized that he has no arm/one their starting receivers had to switch to defense a week before the season due to injuries. While Martinez is also a freshman, he can throw, major difference. Plus he has way more playmakers around him and a much better O-Line(3 Sr compared to only 1 Sr for UI). Johnson at aTm is probably the closest thing we’ve seen to T-Magic really, but more along the lines of JJ last season. He throws the epitome of a lame duck, and with an extremely weak O-Line (7 sacks in our game), any time he saw anyone remotely near him he threw the ball away or no joke fell to the ground like he had given up. Unlike Martinez, Johnson has lost “the edge” that makes players take it to the next level and lead their teams to successful campaigns (ie: Robert Griffen III). I don’t know if we have the DT’s to stuff runs down our throat to be honest. We lost our best DT, as was mentioned above, and they had to date been our one weak spot for our entire defense. If we cannot stop the Nebraska attack at the line, forcing linebackers to play closer to the line, we will probably get burned by some crossing routes. To date, we haven’t had our entire first string D on the field at the same time, and now it won’t happen until at least near the end of the season, if at all. Our LB’s group doesn’t really have one complete player, but they have contrasting traits that have combined to work with the system. Ebner is the hard hitter (as well as backup Andrew Wilson but as a RSFr has limited snaps) and after missing a sizeable chunk of the season due to a DUI is starting to resemble what the reports out of camp initially stated. Zavier Gooden is probably the most well-rounded LB we’ve got, and his combine stats from the beginning of summer football camp were off the charts. This is his first year really getting significant playing time, and with some of the injuries/suspensions throughout the year has pretty much become a starter and steadying force for our LB core. He’s still only a Sophomore, and has made some youthful mistakes, but overall has been the D’s most consistent player. The concern with the linebackers, is that if they are the ones constantly making the stops from the runs up the middle rather than the D-Line it will really wear them out, and combining that with the observation from above about having to play closer to the line, your WR’s would be able to get some more separation. Especially considering that we have to respect your run game and wouldn’t be able to just load the field with DBs to stop the pass.
As has been mentioned in tons of articles throughout the season, Mizzou’s use of sports psychologists has really been crucial to helping our players. Corny, I know. But this team has been able to maintain focus, and has come back from deficits 3 times this year. Teams even as recently as the Chase Daniel era were never able to do that. If they were unable to score at will/weren’t clicking on offense, that was it, game over man, game over. After such a tumultuous offseason, with the media fire that came down with so many arrests and the negative attention it brought to our program (especially that whole D-Wash situation), the team didn’t get caught up, and played through it. While we did get a couple big program wins (when you have 36 wins against a team you’ve been playing for 100 year and that period of 20+ years of losing it’s big) against Nebraska in ‘07 and ’08, those were against Bill Callahan in a very down year, and Bo Pelini who was in his first year and was still playing with mostly Callahan’s players.
I see this game as a complete toss up, and wouldn’t be surprised to see the game go either way. I would love to see the Victory Bell come back to Mizzou’s campus for it’s resting place for a while, but this will be our biggest test of the year, and one of the most important games played between these two teams in its 103 game history. This game will most likely decide the last ever Big XII North Title, as well as who will represent the North in the last Big XII Title game ever. At the start of the year, I guarantee this would’ve been the game that any Mizzou fan would’ve circled at the must win game of the season, and would probably have never guessed the ramification this game would hold for us. I can only hope for the best from my Missouri Tigers, and am looking forward to the dogfight this Saturday. I am sad that this rivalry is coming to an end, and it really is a true shame, but hey, how can I blame you for jumping to the Big 10. Hell, Mizzou would’ve accepted the offer in a heartbeat, and when the Big XII meets its demise in the very near future, I can only hope that we will rejoin you in the Big 10 to rekindle this century year old rivalry. I have never really posted on any other teams’ blogs on SBNation besides Mizzou’s RockMNation, but who knows when I’ll get another chance to interact with Husker fans besides my buddies who moved from STL to Omaha (who go to the Naval Academy and ND and if anyone knows them from HS in Omaha, they’re twins, and it’s a small, small world). I wish Husker Nation all the best of luck (excluding this Saturday at 1:30, joking) and hoping you will run train on the Big 10 teams (Ohio State has had it coming for quite some time now). You’ve got some great fans who show up for better or worse, and will so until there is no more football to be played. It’s a shame that now Mizzou is fielding some respectable teams we may never get a chance to see the full potential of this rivalry hit full stride. Hopefully we will see you again shortly in the Big 10 (not holding our breath after seeing how everything that transpired this offseason) but put in a good word for us so we can beat up on the Big 10 together.
F-Texas. F-OU. Yeah Turner Gill.

by TheHamburglar on Oct 26, 2010 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Is that all?

You’re all over this one.

There can be no second-guessers unless there is first-guesser.

by terpyturtles on Oct 26, 2010 3:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Slow Down

Martinez has shown that he can throw well on a consistent basis against one team with a horrible defense.

by mpfische on Oct 26, 2010 5:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Martinez threw OK against UT

Just his receivers dropped his passes. What can a QB do about that? 5 drops Martinez had.

by meatybob on Oct 26, 2010 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

no kidding

im finding it difficult to get through that massive wall of text.

by Ceek on Oct 26, 2010 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CN needs your tips! Inform us with an email to: cornnation - at - gmail.com. Better yet, join the CN community and create a fanpost or fanshot!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Introduction to the BIGTEN

Recent FanPosts

Small
Huskers catching up with A&M to win Espn contest. Help vote!
Mschultz_small
College Football should be banned - Comments?
N656335037_2472909_5238_small
Please Donate During EDSBS's Charity Drive
Small
How can the B1G improve in baseball?
Nyjer_morgan_butterfly_small
Help a CNer Out - Give Your Opinion on Online Discussion
10982_lores_small
Corn Nation March Appreciation - Congrats, Husker Pucks!
Small
Do you think Notre Dame will ever join the B1G?
Small
Tim Miles = Great Hire!!!
10982_lores_small
CornNation March Appreciation, Day Five

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SHOP THE CORN NATION STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

More Texa$$ Arrogance
Irish payout to Weis keeps piling up
Call me anal retentive, but this is NOT how Nebraska Baseball should make it to ESPiN. The best...
Building for the B1G. Recent aerial photo of Memorial Stadium expansion and Haymarket arena construction from HuskerMax.com.
Adam Carriker writes NEW blog, "Draft Day" on ProInterviews
Alfonzo Dennard bond set at $5000
Brook Berringer, 16 Years On....RIP, #18.

From our friends at HuskerMax.com.
Athletic Department Announces Two Options for Redeeming Spring Game Tickets
Adam Carriker writes about the Off-Season on Pro Interviews
New LB Huskers Commit

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

Photo_6_small Jon Johnston

Rc_icon_small Husker Mike

Editors

Hobbes2_small JLew

Bern_hat_small Brian Speers

Mel-gibson-braveheart-photograph-c1010192231_small Billgrip

Sword_011_small Aaron Musfeldt

Rickysmith_small Ricky Smith

Al_bundy_vs_chobot_small Andy Ketterson

Authors

Cornguy_small Cobby

Sb22_small William Grubb

Pelini_small AdamTheTitan