My Big XII Pre-season Rankings
[Bumped to front page from fan posts]
I agree that we could win the North as easily as anybody else. But my preseason pick is Kansas. Here’s how I rank the Big XII from top to bottom, tell me what you think…..
1. Texas- I give them the edge by a very, very, very, thin hair. An improved running game and OU having some big holes to fill at the O-line position I think gives them a slight edge. If the Red River Shootout was in late November I would probably give the edge to OU because their line would have played together a few more games. The O-line in close games usually is the difference because misques by them usually leads to a killer turnover or 3rd and long situations.
2. Oklahoma- They are just plain good Stoops and Company are amazing. But Mack has had their number. The top two spots are probably interchangeable it just depends on how you think the strengths and weaknesses match up. Hopefully this year it will be settled on the field and we avoid the debacle we had last year.
3. Oklahoma State- I see Robinson and Bryant replacing Harrell and Crabtree I think they could be that potent. With an improved defense they could beat OU or Texas. They will be fun to watch no doubt. But remember, he’s a man!!!
4. Texas Tech - Call me crazy but the mad scientist always has an offense that can score and score and score some more. Besides OU,Texas, and OSU the defenses in the South are poor at best. And with the North’s defenses playing like they did last year during conference play I have them forth. Plus, they always seem to win one they shouldn’t, OU and Texas BEWARE!!!!
5. Kansas- They get the nod over Nebraska and Missouri, in the PRE-SEASON, because of their returning skill position players they don’t have to establish leadership it is there, which is very important I think. Plus they get the Huskers at home. The Border War could get them instead of Mizzou this year. It should be a good race to watch.
6. Nebraska- Besides the D-line and a couple or running backs they don’t have much coming back. A new QB, revamped O-line, and a questionable linebacker and defensive back corps keeps me from picking them over Kansas. But, I think they are better coached than anyone else in the North and that is why I have them ahead of Mizzou. However, I expect to see improvement throughout the season again, how much improvement will determine how far they go.
7. Baylor - Robert Griffith, the guy is amazing Vince Young looking at times. This could be their breakout season with him running the show. Baylor in the South and Nebraska in the North are my two teams to watch flying under the radar in the conference. Baylor is a true WILDCARD!!!
8. Missouri- Pinkel and Co. didn’t get it done last year plain and simple. They didn’t handle the expectations very well at all in my opinion. The were supposed to contend for a national title and Heisman trophy, both flopped. Losing Daniels, Coffman, and probably the most electrifying player in college last year in Maclin will see the Tigers dipping down a little this year. But they have gotten some good recruiting classes these past few years so we’ll see. It is a three horse race in the North let the games begin!!!
9. Texas A&M - They didn’t learn a thing from the Callahan experiment did they! They lost their QB the the NFL this year so that’s not good. When I watched them last year they seemed lost until that look changes I have them towards the bottom of the conference.
10. Colorado - This could be the Hawkins Farewell Tour. New offensive strategy and a questionable defense, things don’t look very bright for the Buffs. But who knows? Boulder is a tough place to win, ask Oklahoma. I could see them easily missing a bowl again this year. If so bye bye Hawkins.
11. Kansas State - With Snyder back the Wildcat faithful are excited again. If he puts together another killer staff like he did in the 90’s they will be back, but not this year, sorry K-state.
12. Iowa State- enough said
This FanPost created by a registered user of Corn Nation.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
i think
you’ve got Colorado way out of line. I see them as the surprise team in the North. Their quarterback play may have been inconsistent, but they’ve got a very strong offensive line, good running backs, and decent tight ends. Their weakness is the defensive line, but they should straighten that out as the year goes along.
CU suffered a massive # of injuries last season, which gave a lot of young guys experience.
Kansas – not so sure. The lack of starting experience on the offensive line bugs me a lot because I’m an offensive line guy. If you’re ranking this as a ‘power poll’ – then you’re okay, but their schedule will kill any chances they have of winning the Big 12 North.
Iowa State – yeah, it’ll take a while before the new coaches have any affect on that program. Thanks, Gene Chizik.
I’d probably move a Big 12 North team above Tech. Not so convinced they can repeat what they did last year.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by corn blight on Jun 10, 2009 12:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm confused why Kansas' schedule...
will “kill any chances they have of winning the Big 12 north.”
It’s no doubt a hindrance and something I think we’d all like to see rectified, despite not really having a better solution. But while it’s certainly the toughest slate of any north team, they still get 5 games against the same five north teams. Worst case scenario they’ll go 0-3 against the south. And really, 1-2 is plenty within reach. So if they are indeed the best team in the north – or even in the discussion – then how far fetched is going 5-0 against only those teams. 5-3 with all 5 wins in the north was enough for Missouri to win it last year – it very well could be for Kansas this year. I very much expect November14th in Lawrence to decide who goes to Dallas.
by hiphopopotamus on Jun 10, 2009 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
schedule
Here’s the 2009 schedule.
1-2 isn’t likely unless you think Kansas is going to beat Oklahoma or Texas, because they go to Lubbock, and Tech has lost only… what, four conference games at home in the 2000s?
They go to Colorado early in conference play, and by then Colorado’s defensive line issues should be sorted out.
They get Nebraska at home, but then they get Missouri late, and Missouri will no longer be inexperienced.
Kansas isn’t going to win the Big 12 North unless other teams flat out fall apart.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by corn blight on Jun 10, 2009 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow
you gave up that easy?
there’s another article up for you to take a look at though
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by corn blight on Jun 11, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't really have much more to say...
Since you’re discounting KU’s chances simply because of their southern slate, you’re essentially saying that there’s no chance Nebraska (or Colorado or Missouri) do any worse than 6-2 in the league. That doesn’t make a bit of sense to me, but if that’s how you feel…
Have to say I did like the new post though…just started a series yesterday over at my site highlighting the strengths and weakness of all league teams (or at least the ones that matter, depending on time).
by hiphopopotamus on Jun 11, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What team
in the North do you think goes ahead of Tech? You not sold on the Jayhawks so that leaves Nebraska, Missouri, or Colorado.
by Huzkerfan on Jun 10, 2009 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
screw it
I’ll go with Nebraska.
I suppose I better start writing up something in full on my own about the North, eh? :)
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by corn blight on Jun 10, 2009 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
my 2 cents
I think Texas Tech will stink it up this year and fall to 5th in the South.
I also think Colorado is too low and Nebraska will in the North.
by Beerdrinkinbreathstinkinsniffinglue on Jun 11, 2009 12:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


























