Glad to see the Husker players enjoy the fruits of their labor at the end of the season. What kind of crotchety SOB (Hee hee hee!!!!) would want to take the bowls away when it's the student athletes who work so hard for a reward at the end of the season?
We're sticking with the same format for our statistical comparisons for Wednesday's game against the Wildcats, so nothing has changed yet. As we're rapidly approaching the offseason, I'm open to any format changes you'd like to see for next year, or any formulas you'd like to follow.
Offensive Statistics
Nebraska | Arizona | ||
---|---|---|---|
Rush YPG | 141.23 (68) | 167.50 (47) | |
Rush YPC | 3.96 (71) | 4.90 (16) | |
Rush TDS | 18 (67) | 19 (59) | |
Pass YPG | 175.9 (101) | 240.0 (39) | |
Pass YPA | 6.7 (87) | 6.4 (97) | |
Pass TDS | 15 (77) | 20 (50) | |
Pass Efficiency | 122.30 (83) | 127.36 (65) | |
Total Offense | 317.20 (102) | 407.5 (40) | |
Scoring Offense | 24.5 (80) | 29.7 (41) |
- Does anyone think we'll magically find a passing offense before this bowl game?
-Arizona's offense not all that special, but consider that they started the season with Matt Scott at quarterback, then switched to Nick Foles who's put together a pretty decent season, completing over 66% of his passes for 2,437 yards, with 19 TDs and 8 INTs. His passer rating is 132.21, higher than the team average.
- Arizona's low yard per catch is most likely due to their penchant for running a lot of screens and under routes. Nick Foles is not mobile (i.e., he's no Todd Reesing), so it'll be interesting to see how they handle Ndamukong Suh and Jared Crick. They can't exactly do a lot of misdirection and rolling the quarterback, and the Huskers will most likely blow up their screens.
- The Wildcats finished second in the Pac-10 in passing offense, and fourth in rushing. Oregon (Jeremiah Masoli) Stanford (Heisman trophy finalist Toby Gerhart) and Cal (Jahvid Best) were ahead of them in rushing, while Oregon State (Jacquizz Rodgers) finished ahead in passing. Each of those teams had a nationally known star player - yet Arizona - you couldn't name someone on their offense unless you were looking for them.
Defensive Statistics
Nebraska | Arizona | ||
---|---|---|---|
Rush YPG | 94.69 (11) | 111.92 (22) | |
Rush YPC | 2.77 (7) | 3.76 (45) | |
Rush TDS | 7 (8) | 14 (40) | |
Pass YPG | 189.1 (25) | 203.9 (43) | |
Pass YPA | 5.4 (6) | 6.2 (21) | |
Pass TDS | 7 (2) | 18 (66) | |
Efficiency | 90.53 (3) | 117.91 (38) | |
Total Defense | 283.8 (9) | 315.8 (21) | |
Scoring Defense | 11.2 (2) | 23.2 (46) |
- We've given up only seven passing TDs this season, three of them against Colorado - that's still an amazing stat, considering the offenses we faced (Texas, Texas Tech, Kansas).
- Arizona faced two of the top rushing offenses in the nation in Oregon and Stanford. Oregon gained 175 yards on 37 attempts for a 4.73 ypc average and three TDs. Against Stanford the Wildcats gave up 150 yards on 40 attempts for a 3.75 ypc average and two TDs. (Unfortunately against Stanford they gave up 434 yards and three TDs passing, but they pull out a 43-38 win).
The Details
Nebraska | Arizona | ||
---|---|---|---|
3rd Down Conversions (Pctg) | 37.16 (79) | 43.27 (33) | |
Red Zone Conversions (Score %) | 80.43 (69) | 79.25 (78) | |
Turnover Margin | +4 (41) | 0 (60) | |
Sacks | 42 (2) | 34 (13) | |
Sacks/Game | 3.23 (3) | 2.83 (12) | |
Tackles for Loss | 89 (14) | 69 (56) | |
Sacks Allowed | 19 (43) | 11 (10) | |
Punting (Avg) | 41.46 (45) | 41.44 (46) | |
Punt Returns (Avg) | 11.34 (34) | 16.40 (4) | |
Kickoffs (Avg) | 68.30 (1) | 62.99 (44) | |
Kickoff Returns (Avg) | 23.31 (34) | 24.48 (11) | |
Penalties (Yds/G) | 64.5 (102) | 44.5 (25) |
- Sacks Allowed by Arizona, 10th, less than one sack given up a game. That's pretty impressive.... until you consider that USC lead the Pac-10 with 35 sacks. That's less than Nebraska, Texas Tech, Texas, and Oklahoma had. Heck, Texas A&M had 35 sacks this season.
- A national ranking of 13th in sacks, doesn't suck however. Wildcat Ricky Elmore finished the regular season with 10.5 sacks to lead the Pac-10. That probably means that we'll see a tight end on his side for most of the game because our tackles have really struggled with good DE's this season. More Dreu Young doesn't exactly suck, you know.
- Arizona's Travis Cobb is ranked 26th in KO returns this season, with a 26.04 average and one touchdown. His touchdown came against Washington State, though, when he had two returns for 131 yards. Niles Paul is 22nd in KO returns, with a 26.47 average and no TDs.
- The Wildcats have returned 15 punts all season. That's 97th in the nation. They're ranked fourth in punt return average because against Washington State they had three returns for 115 yards for a 38.33 yard average and a touchdown. They also had four returns against Arizona State for a 21.75 yard average and a TD. William "Bug" Wright doesn't rank nationally because he hasn't met the minimum, but he's had 11 returns for a 19.18 yard average and a touchdown so far this season.
Opponent Comparison
Total Offense Rank | Nebraska Opponent | Total Defense Rank | Total Offense Rank | Arizona | Total Defense Rank | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 | Florida Atlantic | 112 | 30 | Central Michigan | 28 | |
95 | Arkansas State | 42 | - | Northern Arizona | - | |
57 | @Virginia Tech | 14 | 93 | Iowa | 11 | |
73 | UL-Lafayette | 93 | 37 | Oregon State | 48 | |
31 | @Missouri | 55 | 63 | Washington | 79 | |
7 | Texas Tech | 46 | 13 | Stanford | 85 | |
75 | Iowa State | 99 | 88 | UCLA | 39 | |
85 | @Baylor | 94 | 119 | Washington St | 120 | |
29 | Oklahoma | 7 | 50 | California | 71 | |
26 | Kansas | 75 | 25 | Oregon | 33 | |
81 | Kansas State | 40 | 91 | Arizona State | 12 | |
104 | Colorado | 59 | 56 | USC | 41 | |
18 | Texas | 3 | ||||
53.92 | Average | 56.85 | 55.42 | Average | 47.25 |
I have put this here for discussion purposes. Wow, Washington State really really sucks.
Notice that Arizona played three teams ranked in the top 30 in total offense, while Nebraska played five. Big deal? It is when you consider that Pac-10 fans may feel like the Big 12 doesn't have some good offenses this season.
****
Stats are courtesy of cfbstats.com.
Note on cfbstats.com. Marty over there has restricted access to his situtational views because some self-centered baffoon out there never credited his site for using the stats. That's extremely annoying. Here's a guy who runs a great site that provides a helluva service to college football fans, and some jerk has to go ruin it for everyone. (Insert all sorts of profanity here).