Should Shawn Watson and Barney Cotton Be Fired?
Before I start, let me note that it's always an easy proposition to suggest firing people, especially when you're not the one that has to pull the trigger. If you've read my writing long enough, you know that I have a weak spot for firing people - I'm not part of the crowd that's constantly asking for someone to be shot in the head. It's too easy a solution, although I admit, a popular one.
I like the Shawn Watson's philosophy of a "multiple offense". I'm not ignorant of the fact that a powerful running attack is part of Nebraska's heritage, but the ability to shift into a spread and use the zone read and spread option plays give us a huge advantage over our opponents - we just didn't execute them well this season.
I disagree with the notion that Nebraska can't recruit skill position players that can run anything other than a power running game. If Bill Callahan could recruit decent quarterbacks (Zac Taylor, Joe Ganz) and receivers (Maurice Purify, Nate Swift), then why can't this staff?
You can write off some of the offensive problems as turnover in players, but only some. Still, the West Coast offense is largely dependent upon timing and that timing has to be developed between a quarterback and his receivers. We knew it would be tough to replace Joe Ganz, Nate Swift, and Todd Peterson, but I don't think anyone could have foreseen the difficulties Watson faced early in the season when the receivers were not performing as well as was needed. Menelik Holt started the first five games, then disappeared along with Curenski Gilleylen and Chris Brooks. Holt had 15 receptions for 175 yards, none after the Iowa State game. Brooks had 13 receptions for 177 yards, but none since Texas Tech when he had five receptions for 66 yards to lead the receivers. Gilleylen had 16 receptions for 299 yards, none after Iowa State.
They were replaced by Khiry Cooper and Brandon Kinnie. Kinnie finished the regular season with 13 receptions for 129 yards, with 12 of those receptions coming after Iowa State. Cooper's receptions were split throughout the season, as he finished with 13 receptions for 80 yards, with seven coming after Iowa State.
The only consistent receiver all season was Niles Paul and even he had problems (turnover at the goal line, Iowa State). Paul finished with 36 catches for 673 yards to lead the receivers, having six receptions against Iowa State and 13 the rest of the season.
That level of turnover doesn't allow a quarterback to develop the much heralded "chemistry" with his receivers. Granted, Lee's accuracy didn't seem to improve over the season, so you could argue it didn't make much difference as to whom he was throwing the ball.
As for Barney Cotton, the offensive line did progress somewhat throughout the season although the offensive output did not. The number of holding calls and false starts dropped as the season went on, and the line was asked to do a lot with defenses stacked against them to stop the run.
Add to that a general lack of depth. Jacob Hickman played well at center, and Ricky Henry started every game at right guard (the position that was unsettled before the season began). Marcel Jones and D.J. Jones played in rotation at right tackle while Mike Smith started every game at left tackle. Derek Meyer started when Keith Williams was injured, then Williams took over the starting left guard position for the final ten games. The loss before the season of Jaivorio Burkes at tackle and incoming freshman Brent Qvale certainly didn't help the depth issue. Off the top of my head, what we didn't see is the level of in-game rotation that we've seen in past seasons. (I"ll look into this more in the off-season.)
I suspect that most people would like to see Cotton fired because of his association with failed coaching regimes of the past (Solich at Nebraska, McCarney at ISU) rather than knowing much about offensive line coaching. In his defense, keep in mind that, other than Ricky Henry, these are still Bill Callahan's offensive linemen (In other words, Callahan's preference for size over speed still plagues the offense).
Going back to Watson, I'm not 100% sure what to think, other than he got hit with a perfect storm this season - a new starting quarterback, inconsistent receivers, and an offensive line that, well, had its problems. Add to these the fact that one quarterback left before the season started (Patrick Witt) while another was lost to injury at the start of the season (Kody Spano). Running back depth was severely hampered by dismissal (Quentin Castille) and injury (Roy Helu, Rex Burkhead).
A counter argument would point out that every team has to deal with injuries and then list all of the teams that did well despite them. For that, I have a response: Oklahoma.
The biggest problem with firing a coach, especially an offensive coordinator, is that you're going to throw away a year while the new guy implements his system. The counter argument here (I assume) is to bring in someone who runs a much simpler offense, so easy that you and I and a trained monkey can run it. Or perhaps magic happens and everyone instantaneously learns the new offense by having chips implanted in their brains or something like that. (If you're voting for a simplified offense, I vote for Texas Tech's then, because they replace quarterbacks and receivers year after year and seem to get the same fantastic results.)
So, give me your answer to the title question. Does one of these guys need to answer for this season? Or maybe both?
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
Forgive a Tiger fan for chiming in
To say that Mizzou has a tough time firing any of its guys would be an understatement. However, we did get to see the obvious growing pains of a first year coordinator. This time we saw it on both sides of the ball. It sucks. Fans often see the new coach fail to stop a 3rd and medium or get stuck in a red zone and suddenly the new guy sucks worse than the guy he replaced. The same fan usually had the same complaint about the previous regime.
Here is the question I would pose. Do you think the problem is more scheme or talent oriented? The reason I ask is outside of the 3 1/2 minute outburst Nebraska had against us (arg), I haven’t seen much there. In fact, as the season went along, the offense seemed to regress and face it, this isn’t a strong defensive league. I wasn’t aware of any major injuries until I saw this article. To your defense’s credit, you still managed to win. Against Texas I was suprised Lee wasn’t ordered to just take a knee on each play and then punt, ala The Waterboy. If it were me, I’d have a hard time wanting to keep Watson. Even if it were purely talent based, teams need to show improvement on a week to week basis.
Respect and honor your opponent, unless that opponent is a fictional bird. In which case you hit him until he falls, kick him until dead and burn the remains.
I like Watson...
but I wonder if he’s really a fit. Things were great last year, but this year….UGH! Lose him or keep him, either way we’re taking a chance. I think it boils down to “who are we and who do we want to be.” Watson wants to sling it around. We hear so much about having to run the ball to win. We’ve done neither very well this year and I wonder if there isn’t a conflict in philosophy between who we are and who we want to be. I wonder if Watson will get any job offers this year and if he’d be more likely to take them. Cotton? That’s another story. 2 scholly kids on the team and it seems the only way to lose him would be to promote him. Next OC? I shudder to think.
Cotton Family
Don’t forget the dynamics involved with two of Coach Cotton’s sons on the roster now in Ben & Jake. I don’t think that would necessarily mandate a decision one way or another, but it could certainly have an impact in the locker room.
Also, just some anecdotal evidence in support of Barney. I was on a tour of the facilities when I was back in town for the K-State game, and he was still in his office after 9pm. I have no idea what he was working or what kind of hours coaches typically keep, but he was clearly putting in some effort.
Good question....
It’s hard to tell if Watson’s system is too complicated for tis level, or if the kids are just not talented enought this season. It’s pretty damn hard to run anything when your kids can’t block, complicated or not. If the deal is that these kids are just not talented enough, then we shouldn’t risk upsetting the apple cart as a “quick fix” Neither Cotton or Watson can play for these guys on the field. Not to mention that between the 2 coaches, we have 3 coaches sons on the team. Not that it would be like Hawkins at CU, but still.
I f the case is that the kids are good players, but the system is just not fitting well…then yes, by all means give Watson and Cotton their last warnings.
If you read my Fanpost on 2010, you will see that what we really need is just a little bit of patience. This year was all about getting the defense to work like a machine. Did that. Now I think we need a bit of time to get the offense worked out and settled. Let Lee and Green battle it out again for the QB spot, focus on blocking, and for God’s sake don’t fire 2 coaches after a 9(10)-4 season!!!!
GO BIG RED!
Oklahoma, really?
Sure, they stepped back offensively, but their overall offense is still way better than Nebraska’s. Averaged more than 100 yds per game and a touchdown more than Nebraska, with a freshman QB. And these are overall stats from Big XII sports. I would ehate to see the disparity between only Big XII games.
http://www.big12sports.com/fls/10410/pdfs/football/09Big12_FB_Stats.pdf
Not to mention that one could argue that OU played a tougher schedule. And I am not trying to pile on Watson, but I don’t think that OU is a good counterpoint.
Offense needs to decide what it wants to do.
This hodgepodge of coaching philosophies is not cutting it. This team and coaching staff need to find an identity, then recruit players to run that system.
What exactly does the offense do well? Anything?
Currently it seems that NU is running an offense that has the sophistication of a high school team. There is no window dressing in formations, or movement to create deception. And even with the watered down system NU still looks to be poor at execution. They are poor in production.
I’m not buying the O-lIne was recruited by Callahan argument as much. Watson has adjusted the offense to meet personal, (or at least has tried) I would expect Cotton to adjust his techniques as well. Again what does this line do well? And why are they unable to do anything well?
Is change needed? After this year I would say yes. Is the needed change just more experience at key positions, and talent upgrade at others? Is that change removing a coach or two? Is it just finding an identity?
If I had to guess, and I am, I’d say that NU is going to try and follow the SEC model. Strong, fast defense, with a pro style power running game that has enough of a passing attack to stop opposing defense from loading up the box (like now). I’m thinking similar to LSU, and Bama.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
two of the pieces that make the 'bama offense click
are their Jr QB and their heisman-bound RB. We have some solid guys at RB, but i just don’t know if we can execute with our current QB. The biggest problem I see is that the playing styles of Green/Lee are polar opposites. They don’t compliment each other like different running backs do…the O line has to adjust, the receivers have to adjust, and I think it lends itself to our offense’s overall confusion. Our D comes at you in multiple ways, but the philosophy is the same – fast and physical. I can’t really list what our offensive philosophies are, because we try to be multiple before being good at running or passing.
In the end, I trust Bo’s choices. He’s proven that his ideas work. But I do think he needs to be a complete HEAD coach and not just a D-coordinator who can yell at the refs more because he’s in charge.
Oh they need to be finding a RB recruit
Like now. We have no (or very few) offensive skill people committed currently. Where is the help coming from? I think we’re ok at QB, I’m hoping that Lee can make the jump, or more likely that Green will mature through the bowl practices, and spring into the starter we hope he can be. At WR Paul is a start (needs work) and Kinnie could be special with more experience. Jon had a article about Kinnie to start the season where his head coach stated that he would not make a difference this year, he needed time to adjust to Div-1 football. Look out next year though.
We are going into next year with 2 RB that played hurt, or were injured most of the season. I don’t see much help in the depth that is there, we would have seen them on the field this year had that been the case.
If this staff doesn’t get a QB and a RB look for them to shoot the moon next year for one. They’ll have to.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
The offseason creates little more than rampant speculation, but
I’m still pretty excited about how special we’re going to be next year. We were special this year, yes with a massive 1st round talent in the middle, but the fact remains – we were special, and our offense was HORRIBLE. Yes, down the road we are going to have to get some offensive depth, but this defense is the ultimate buffer against the growing pains a young offense would suffer.
I don’t know that I don’t want this team to run a spread system. We know how to defend it better than almost anybody, so why not use that to our advantage? If you can find something within that system that is virtually undefendable our defense would be the perfect defense to try it against.
Watson, if retained, needs to get on the same page as his players and figure out what they do well and run with it.
Hang 'em!!!
by Screwface on Dec 10, 2009 1:38 PM CST via mobile reply actions
I was all for firing cotton
BUt the o line did play better towards the end so we will see. No matter what our o line Has to play much better
I honestly think o-line play was not nearly as bad as everyone seems to think. Asking 6-7 blockers to block 8-9 people is asking a lot. Without threat of the pass, why should defenses respect it?
Our offensive woes lie strictly on quarterback play. You can’t keep a defense honest without the passing threat. If you go back and watch, when Lee had 3+ seconds to pass the ball he either a) overthrew the receiver, b) severely underthrew the receiver, c) threw to the wrong color jersey, d) threw behind his receiver, or e) (also least likely) hit his receiver in stride.
The quick slant is the most basic play a quarterback can make. It a) keeps the defense from blitzing the corner and b) keeps the linebackers on their heels. Lee never got into enough of a rhythm with his WRs to make it work which, I believe, shows exactly what was wrong with this offense all year.
Hang 'em!!!
by Screwface on Dec 10, 2009 5:20 PM CST via mobile reply actions
The problem
I saw throughout the season is that there was no leader on the offensive side of the ball. I don’t see the spark provided from any member of the offensive squad as there was last year provided by Joe Ganz, Todd Peterson and Nate Swift. Coaching can only do so much, but in the heat of battle you have to have a leader in the huddle who can practically will their team into the end zone.
"Where do you put the bayonet?" (upon seeing a flamethrower fo the first time)
100% of that goes right back to the QB. If you have a good QB it doesn’t matter if he’s the fiery rally-the-troops type (Drew Brees, Peyton Manning) or a quiet do-as-I-do type (Brett Favre, Eli Manning), he’ll get the job done.
I’ve seen some of Lee’s old video and I don’t understand why he’s not the same quarterback I saw then.
Hang 'em!!!
by Screwface on Dec 11, 2009 6:09 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
To Fire or Not to Fire
…mmmh. Would you keep Kevin Cosgrove? (have we improved since he was fired) Do you want Callahan back? (Have we improved since he was fired?)
Watson can not guide our offense to the end zone or recruit players. (thats his only job). Nebraska did not improve on offense all season. The Offense LOST Nebraska EVERY game this year with one of the Better defenses its had in YEARS. V-TECH, TEXAS TECH, IOWA STATE, TEXAS our offense MADE us lose. Our Defense MADE us WIN every single game we won.
Just ask yourself is Watson improving our recruiting talent,,,is he improving our offense.
Can he call a game……can he CREATE offense with the talent he has. The answer to all is no.
TALENTED players can hide a bad coach …..if you have lack of talent and a sub-par coach your Toast.
I believe that in 2008 the offense, under Watson was 14th in the country. It’s a team game. Players, coaches, AD, etc. Nebraska’s recruiting class in the mid 90s was never ranked in the top 25 if I recall correctly. How did they pull off those national championships? Zac Lee is a first year starter as a junior. Does anyone remember Colt McCoy’s first year as a freshman following Vince Young?
Most attention spans on these type of sites is unusually short. I suspect the same people claiming to know what to do with Mr. Cotton and Mr. Watson were (or would have been) yelling for Coach Osborne to be fired in the late 70s. Nebraska came into it’s own again in the mid 80s. That took 14 years since Osborne took over. It takes time to build a program. It takes chemistry. It takes players.
Offense
I can’t imagine another year of pitiful offense. I saw absolutely nothing from this pair that would cause me to bring them back. Enough already, there are too many top notch successful college coaches that would die for the job. I saw no imagination, no a glimmer of ingenuity. Send them both packing and bring in a innovator.
Here a list to start from:
Jim Grobe,Bobby Johnson,Jim Leavitt or Mike Riley
Of Course:
Turner Gill would have been my pick but if ya snooze ….. you get buggered!
Life journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body
but rather to skid in sideways totally worn out shouting bogety bogety man what a ride!
by It_is_what_it_is ! on Dec 25, 2009 12:40 AM CST reply actions

by 




















