Under the Hood: Nebraska vs Oklahoma Statistical Comparison

by corn blight on Nov 4, 2009 8:15 AM CST in Football Comment 6 comments

More photos » by Orlin Wagner - AP

What's your perception about Oklahoma? Juggernaut? Wounded and vulnerable? Or does it matter?

Husker fans would have put the Sooners in 'juggernaut' category before this season began, writing this game off as a loss. That perception probably hasn't changed much due to our laggard offense, even though Oklahoma isn't the same team they were at the start of the season.

This game features two of the best defenses in the nation, and when I say best, I don't mean "in the top 20" in defensive categories, I mean number one and two in a lot of categories. That should lead to a very interesting game.

Offensive Statistics

	Nebraska	Oklahoma
Rush YPG	146.13 (62/7)	146.50 (60/6)
Rush YPC	4.51 (42/2)	3.91 (77/8)
Rush TDS	13 (53/8)	12 (63/9)

Pass YPG	221.8 (57/8)	277.4 (20/4)
Pass YPA	7.1 (62/7)	7.4 (47/5)
Pass TDS	12 (58/8)	19 (11/3)
Pass Efficiency	128.14 (62/8)	140.63 (33/5)

Total Offense	367.9 (69/9)	423.9 (30/4)

Defensive Statistics

	Nebraska	Oklahoma
Rush YPG	95 (10/3)	80 (3/2)
Rush YPC	2.65 (7/3)	2.56 (3/2)
Rush TDS	5 (12/3)	4 (8/2)

Pass YPG	171.4 (13/1)	197.3 (37/3)
Pass YPA	5.6 (11/3)	5.5 (9/2)
Pass TDS	3 (1/1)	7 (15/2)

Total Defense	266.4 (8/2)	277.3 (11/3)
Scoring Defense	11.3 (4/1)	12.6 (8/2)

Nebraska vs. Oklahoma Opponent Positional Ranks

Total Offense Rank	Nebraska Opponent	Total Defense Rank	Total Offense Rank	Oklahoma	Total Defense Rank
9	Florida Atlantic	110	11	BYU	51
87	Arkansas State	44	-	Idaho State	-
73	@Virginia Tech	29	54	Tulsa	46
81	UL-Lafayette	97	55	Miami	52
64	@Missouri	32	84	Baylor	85
4	Texas Tech	59	31	Texas	3
57	Iowa State	90	10	Kansas	47
84	@Baylor	85	75	Kansas State	43
57.38	Average	68.25	45.71	Average	46.71

Idaho State not FCS, so not included.

- I was surprised to see that Oklahoma is struggling at running the ball more than we are. Given how much angst has gone into screaming about Shawn Watson's playcalling, both teams suffer from the same basic problem - weak offensive lines.

- If we looked further, we'd find that both teams have the deck literally stacked against them when it comes to the run. Both teams have faced heavy defensive fronts all year, forcing both offenses into a passing game.

- Which leads directly to the biggest difference between these two teams - Oklahoma has figured out how to score touchdowns in the passing game. There is a seven touchdown differential between these offenses. To put it bluntly, that means that Menelik Holt would have caught the ball in the end zone against Virginia Tech, Niles Paul would have held onto the ball and scored against Iowa State, and then we'd have five more against Texas Tech. We'd be undefeated! (Okay, fine.... we'd have beaten Virginia Tech and Iowa State, but we wouldn't be in the position we're in now).

- Gosh, did I just say that the offense has problems on both the offensive line and receiving corps? Why... yes, I did. Does that exonerate Shawn Watson? Not entirely. The "towards the bottom half of the conference" yards per catch is endemic of Watson's "throw to the sideline"

- Defense.... people don't like defensive games anymore, do they? Boring watching two teams beat the crap out of each other, apparently. Well, I hope this game is boring for everyone in the fact that it needs to be low scoring because that gives Nebraska a chance. Oklahoma can score. Nebraska can not.... or at least has not.

- If you're holding hope that this is the game the offense breaks out..... I admire your faith. Join us for the game thread!

0 recs | Comment 6 comments | Add comment | Share