Regular Season Thoughts
[Promoted to Front Page from the Fanposts]
9-3, as the frost settles in on another Husker football season.
If someone had told me that we could have won 9 games this season, I would have said "yes, I can see that". I would have then offered the suggestion that our 3 losses would be to Missouri, VT, and Oklahoma.
Thankfully, we have a different lineup of losses. Let me explain.
Residing in Cyclone country, I hear a lot about the loss to Iowa State. Being only 2 hours from the border, I actually hear jabbering from both Nebraska followers, and from the clowns in Ames. Aside from the "little brother" complex spewed forth by Cyclone fans everywhere, I also see a lot of Big Red faithful pointing to how we should be a 10-2 team. How the ISU loss was a fluke. My question is, would you rather the outcomes of the ISU and OU games be reversed and played out as predicted?
Not this Husker. I would much rather own a 9-3 record having won a huge game against a real, quality, Big 12 South team in OU, versus the same record, with an easy and assumed win against the Cyclones... taking the loss against Oklahoma as predicted.( Not to mention the untold emotional impact of beating OU again in a rivalry game).
The Iowa State game has no significance now, other than waking our coaches up to some very real issues on the offensive side of the ball. In fact it may have helped us realize a few things about ourselves, something we needed before hitting the home stretch. The VT loss was a good battle, in which the popular opinion being that the Huskers played the better game. Texas Tech...well...they can beat anyoneone in the top 5 if they hold the opponent to under 20 points. I think if we squeak that ISU game out, and end up 10-2....the consequences would be an expectation to play like a top 15 team. Something which we are not.
As it stands, we are in a great postition to shock some people and win a bowl game by virtue of that pesky 3rd loss. A 9-3 or 9-4 record puts us in a very decent bowl position, one we can manage. 10-2 or 11-2 would be setting the expectations too high, and lining us up against a far superior team. We are not an 11-2 team, and shouldn't be playing in games we have no business being in. Can you imagine the pressure heaped upon these guys if they were 10 (11)-2?
Yes, I think we lost the right 3 games this year. Bo is always preaching about these kids learning about life and adversity outside of the lines. I think the ISU loss did that. Thank you ISU, for opening our eyes to the tasks ahead of us. ( I know, it's much more fun to hate us and gloat over the win) The resulting improvements and adjustments allowed for a monumental win against the Sooners, which in my opinion turned the corner for this coaching staff. The Huskers seem to have gotten a few ugly games out of the way, therefore setting up a possible perfect storm against the 'Horns.
What do you think? Do we own a record that is befitting of our team? Did we lose when we should have? Did we win when we deserved it?
This FanPost created by a registered user of Corn Nation.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Soild Post
I have to agree that the ISU loss perhaps was the thing that this team needed. I mean in all reality that loss didn’t do anything to hurt our bowl hopes since we had already lost twice and were out of the national title picture. The only thing that it seemed to do was force the team to come to the realization that there are no gimmie games and that we were going to need to fight our way into respectability.
On another note I think that we have a shot against Texas but believe that we can not win with an offense as bad as ours is playing right now. I have never seen a team that can be out gained by so much and still manage to win games like we have this year. It speaks volumes about how good the defense has been but can not take away from the fact that our offense has been terrible as a unit. I hate to get down on any of our coaching staff but Barney Cotton really has not significantly improved our offensive line at this point in the season, and that is disappointing.
Good defense = short field = doesn’t take a lot of yards to score points. 90% of NU’s scoring this year in Big XII play is attributed to working with a short field. Which does not reflect well on this team. We have no idea what Nebraska would have done in long field situations yesterday, because we never really had to deal with them.
Nebraska scored 28 points yesterday when they only ran 54 plays, conversely, Colorado ran 72 plays and ended up with only 20 points (14 for the pragmatic.) Mind you, also, the offense only threw the ball 5 times on their last 3 possessions.
I’m not too worried about this team. I don’t think they have what it takes to make a huge come-from-behind rally, but I also don’t think the defense will ever put them in a position to have to.
This team is in a different league than last year’s and I don’t think it’s even close. Spared a 21 point loss to TT, this team hasn’t been remotely blown out and has been competetive in every game. (If the Texas Tech game was played this weekend, NU wins 24 – 17. Sheffield made that team much better than Potts, and I don’t believe it’s arguable.)
NU is not a top 10 team, but I believe this defense could hang with just about anybody.
GBR!!!
by Screwface on Nov 28, 2009 3:07 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Agreed
What kept jumping out at me was the O-Line and how badly we were getting pushed backwards. Burkhead was able to gain yards because he hit the line of scrimmage faster than Helu did. Ol’ Barney better hope these guys get better over the next few years, or he may be gone.
Between Henery and the defense, I hope we are always on a short field, and the ’Horns are always 90 yards away…
I have such great hope for our 2010 year if we keep improving through the bowl game practices and spring. Although our first four games are probably not going to give us a good indication of where we are. But our schedule seems in our favor.
Washington will be as good as Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State, and Colorado.
GBR!!!
by Screwface on Nov 28, 2009 10:50 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Henery
I think Henery deserves heaps of respect for the whole “short field” situation. Without him, we’d be a much worse team. He’ll be moving on to the pros.
I agree that our team is right where they should be. Even when you consider that the VT game was stolen out from under our noses, our record indicates what kind of talent we’ve got. We deserve a bowl game somewhere between X-mas and New Years.
I’m assuming we lose to Texas. I understand that A&M gave ‘em a run, and our defense is awesome…but I just don’t see our offense doing anything to help our situations..and against the #3 team in the country, you’ve gotta have a complete squad.
Henery
is probably the 2nd most valuable player on our team. When I think back to this 2009 season, I will think of Suh and Henery and maybe Helu. That double punch combo to Colorados gut last year by those 2 guys sealed their place in Husker history.

by 






















