Is It Time for the Black Shirt Tradition To Die?
Husker fans know the both the Blackshirt and black shirt tradition. " The Blackshirts" is the name by which Nebraska's defense is known. "Black shirts" are typically awarded to defensive players who show the highest level of play - not all starters receive them.
Much has been made about the black shirts this season, whether from fans and the media. Both wondered (obsessed?) about when they would be handed out, if at all. Pelini waited until the night before the Texas Tech game to give out the blackshirts, and the team responded by playing poorly. It's not a cause and affect issue - the blackshirts didn't cause the team to get heady and fall down, but it's obvious that Pelini made the move then to attract as little attention as possible.
Is being awarded a blackshirt special to the defensive players? Yeah, you bet it is. It means they get to join a pretty elite group with a great history. There's some value in awarding hard work, but I wonder it the tradition fits with Pelini's mentality as a head coach.
The shirts appear to be nothing more than an irritation to him. He was asked about them repeatedly before he handed them out. After the Texas Tech game, some reporter had the gall (or the stupidity) to ask him about them again. His response:
"Quit worrying about the Blackshirts. Get over it," coach Bo Pelini said. "We didn't play well enough. It had nothing to do with Blackshirts or yellow shirts or white shirts, or whatever the hell it is.
"We got our butts kicked. It's not about Blackshirts. It's about executing on game day when we're out there in red and white, and we didn't do that."
Pelini's response isn't surprising. Fans might look at the total yardage output and convince themselves that holding Texas Tech 262 yards under their average counted for something, but they would be overlooking the opening drive during which the defense twice allowed Tech to convert on third and long. Tech converted on a fourth and one in the second quarter, gaining 22 yards on an outside run which then lead to another Red Raider touchdown. Then there was the 58-yard pass that allowed Tech to get a field goal just before half time.
Add to those the defensive penalties, and the game wasn't a stellar performance. It's not that the defense played horrible. They didn't. But they didn't play like an elite unit either, the kind that wins Big 12 championships and gets into BCS bowl games. Even Ndamukong Suh didn't feel that the defense played well enough to warrant keeping the black shirts, and Suh obviously knows something about performing at a very high level.
Fans seem anxious about the black shirts, as if by handing them out the defense has assumed elite status. This is important, too, as the symbolic nature of the award is a sign the defense is doing well. It's something fans can hang onto, something to cheer about. Without that, what's the point in being a fan?
The media seems just as obsessed with them, possibly because it gives them something to write about that they know fans will connect with, but more likely because it's difficult to write much about the team when Pelini gives them so little meat with which to write.
My problem with the black shirts is they don't seem to fit Pelini's mode of operation. After watching him coach for the past season and a half, it's clear Pelini expects effort on a consistent basis. You don't have to look much further than his twitter bio to understand his philosophy:
The secret to success is constancy of purpose
Translation - if you're not going 100% all of the time, you're not going to be successful. It's not that difficult to understand, but like most things in life, easy to say and damned hard to do. It takes quite a bit of tenacity to work hard all of the time, with emphasis on ALL.
When you award an honor to a player, it elevates them to an elite status. It places them at the top of a hierarchy, at the top of the organization. Yet Pelini has shown that he's not above sitting players on the bench if they're not performing well, even it it's a decision made during a game. Phillip Dillard replacing Will Compton during the Tech game was sign of that, as was Zac Lee's benching in favor of Cody Green. The week before, Niles Paul and Menelik Holt were benched for a while in favor of Brandon Kinnie and Antonio Bell.
Forget that some of those guys are on offense - it's the hierarchy that counts. It's clear the only hierarchy that matters to Pelini is who is performing at the highest level right now, and "right now" is literally right now, whether it be during a game or at practice. Awarding some guys black shirts because they've done something well in the past doesn't fit with that concept.
As we saw Saturday, this team is capable of playing extremely well some of the time. Until that's become "all of the time", then there's still a mental mold to be formed. And the last thing Pelini wants these guys to think is that they've achieved something because up to this point, they haven't.
The Blackshirt tradition - the name by which the Husker defense is known - should stay and it will. But perhaps it's time for the black shirts to go. They don't seem to fit the mold of the current head coach. The tradition appears forced, and if that's how Bo Pelini feels, then it's a tradition we should consider living without.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
I think
they should stay!!!! I believe that Pelini makes them the distraction they have become by waiting to hand them out. Not everyone of the past defenses (even under Bob and Tom) were steller every single game. By waiting to hand them out Bo makes the fans, media and even the players wonder what has to be done to get one. That is the distraction.
Give the dam things out the opening week of the season to the players who have earned a starting postion and any back ups who you deem fit. Then if you play poorly enough to lost that starting postion you lose it. Make them keep it instead of earn it and it becomes less of a distraction. Anyone who steps up enough to earn one gets it, starter or not. You can have backups who play as well as starters and not start and they could earn a blackshirt. We all know that Tom handed out more then 11 every year.
Give the kid a shirt tell him “if you want to keep it, if you want the honor of what this means then you had better play your ass off every single play”. With Bo waiting and waiting and waiting everyone starts wondering every single game if they have done enough to get awarded…thus becoming a distraction. I honestly thought the D had proved itself enough in the VTECH game to have gotten them then.
by taflorom on Oct 20, 2009 8:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
points
They should stay, then, because you want them to. Not because of how Pelini might want to run his program, correct?
He could resolve it by just giving one to everybody that plays defense, but then most likely no one would be happy.
Why is this such an emotional issue for Husker fans? They are still Blackshirts without actually having the shirts, aren’t they?
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Oct 20, 2009 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No
because it is part of the Husker tradition….because if you polled most of the coaches and players the would most likely want it….and I have not heard Bo say he wants to get rid of it. Have you? He said to get over it. My guess is that he had more important things to worry about then weather he took back the black shirts. He had to figure out what was wrong with his team. Where do you get that he doesnt want to continue the tradition…or should we just get rid of them cause you want to?
by taflorom on Oct 20, 2009 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't care
one way or another to be honest. I just want a winning football team.
If they’re a distraction to Pelini, OR they don’t fit with his coaching philosophy, then they should go. I suspect that he feels like he has to uphold tradition, though, because part of that is what got the last guy fired (of course it didn’t help that he completely sucked as a head coach).
Pelini had it exactly right – the only thing that matters is how they do when they’re wearing red and white on game days.
They’re just shirts. That’s all they are. I guess I’m just amazed at how much fans are attached to them. The defense will still be known as the Blackshirts, with or without them, so what’s the difference?
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Oct 20, 2009 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In high school...
…we used red mesh beanies, embarrassingly fitted over our helmets to differentiate the defense from the offense.
We were Redheads and nobody seemed to care.
"Somebody left the door open and the wrong dogs came home."
by HiPlainsDrifter on Oct 20, 2009 9:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The tradition lives . .
with or without the shirts. They are more important to fans than Coach Pelini and perhaps the players. The defense will always be known as the Blackshirts as long as the media and the program continues to refer to them in that manner. They have become a distraction. The Wrecking Crew will be the Wrecking Crew at A&M without giving each player a sledgehammer. Obviously Pelini sees them as a distraction. He has a reason for doing what he is doing. It seems that there are a number of other things much more important about putting a team on the field other than when or if the defense will show up at practice with black shirts.
by jon's only friend on Oct 20, 2009 9:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















