Nebraska vs. Texas Tech Postgame Overreaction -Reset The Season
Just so you know, this is actually an overreaction. In the past few weeks, I've tried to do more actual analysis, taking a look at the game and how it happened. Not today (Zerg). This is a complete overreaction. It is. I wouldn't lie to you.
Today I'm especially disgusted, as you should be, by the performance of the Husker offense.
Bottom line - we sucked. Offensively we sucked in nearly every part of the game, and there is plenty of suck to go around. Let's get something straight - if we're going to cheer Husker heroes when we're winning, we should be prepared to beat on them a little bit when they suck. And suck they did.
- This one can be chalked up to taking it for granted. Niles Paul drops a pass that's a lateral, watches it roll while Tech picks it up to run for a free touchdown. The stupidity of that play cannot be described here. I'm sure Bo Pelini has described it to someone.... well, probably everyone on that team. And well he should, because it doesn't fit with his philosophy - play all the time, every time, and we win.
- We saw a reset today. Cody Green replaced Zac Lee, and it wasn't in garbage time. The only touchdown of the game came from Green to Khiry Cooper. Oh, don't recognize those names? Whatever. Who starts next week at QB and WR?
- Hey, nice job Ricky Henry! So, that's what they mean by "fiery" - hitting people after the whistle has stopped. Good job of costing us the red zone. If you're the best right guard we have, we are totally screwed in the running game. Do us the favor of having a brain transplant or not seeing the field again.
- And sticking with Henry.... this is a subject I want to avoid - Barney Cotton as offensive line coach. I tend to believe professionals make better choices than I would, but holy crap, can this offensive line suck much worse than they already do? What the hell is Cotton teaching them? To stand around watching guys get tackled?
- Defense - can you be blamed much? Hmmmm.. no. Early on, the 7-for-7 for 93 yards that Sheffield had can be excused on luck and coaching. But the rest? Let's give it up for Texas Tech -their quarterback Sheffield played very well, as did their receivers.
- Bottom line - we're going to watch the Nebraska media this week beat the shit out of Shawn Watson. They already started it last week, so they're going to start piling on more this week. Heads up - I like Shawn Watson. I like his offense. I like multiple. Other coaches, like maybe the guy who's in charge of the line - not so much maybe. That's not Shawn Watson's fault. It's Pelini's call as to who coaches the line. Not Watson. Keep that in mind.
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
A new OC for the Big Red Machine
It’s hard enough to live in TX and support the Big Red Machine but when Shawn W mails it in like he did to day I will never be able to live this one down. Good Lord are we back to the days of Billy C with inconsistent and ofen times plain stupid play calls. NU O has no idenity. We do nothing well- as the saying goes Jack of all trades but master of none. The NU O of old you could always count on them doing one thing well even if other parts of the game suffred ie passing. But now we can do nothing well. From an outsiders prespective the OC is just closing his eyes and puting his finger down on the play chart and that what he calls. If the O wants to run the ball then by God line up and put some one on their back sides. Next point Zack has got to go. The poor performance in Mizzery was not the weather as most people thoght it was. Give Cody the shot her deserves and let him learn. By next year he will have enough experience to make the team better and give us a shot at winning the North.
Congrats to the D for the game you tried your best to keep us in this one but you can’t polish the turd that was the O effort today.
Thought for today NU needs and new OC and Lord help us against OU because we could very easly be the first game in recenct history with negative yards for the entire game.
by NufaninTX on Oct 17, 2009 8:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
How much talent is there?
What has yet to be determined is how much talent there really is on offense. The defense has talent. Perhaps physical and not mental in the d-backfield, but the athletes are there. With freshmen playing linebacker, one has to ask is it because they are that talented or the depth is so poor? I would like to believe the former, but there is no doubt that depth is a problem at that position. However, on the offensive side of the of the ball, what level of talent really exists? Is Helu a “Nebraska back?” I don’t even want to talk about O-line. It looks like perhaps there are some young receivers that can catch and run, but apparently the ones that have had the starts can’t. Tight ends? Who knows? Maybe two balls thrown their way today? When it all goes well I think that the critics are over analyzing, but with the performance we have seen the past two weeks, perhaps it is Watson that is.
by jon's only friend on Oct 17, 2009 9:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you really wondering whether Helu is very talented?
Or am I just confused? Because that seems like an absurd statement to me. He’s one of the best RBs Nebraska has had this decade.
by Cheeseandcorn on Oct 17, 2009 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and the best running back in the Big 12, by quite a bit
I guess I'm just a worrier, that's why my friends call me whiskers
by Nunyabidness on Oct 17, 2009 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just because Helu is our best RB doesn't make him the best RB in the Big 12!
Helu is good and definitely our best player, but he needs to do it consistently against the Big 12, not the Sun Belt! Offensive line has a lot to do with his success, which is true of any running back.
by Champ24 on Oct 17, 2009 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If someone can explain why we ignored our best offensive player for the second straight week
I’ll believe Watson shouldn’t be blamed.
I guess I'm just a worrier, that's why my friends call me whiskers
by Nunyabidness on Oct 17, 2009 9:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
There's no way he's 100%
Darn we are missing Q right about now…
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
by JLew on Oct 17, 2009 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To me it starts with the o line
Tt d ends were 3 or 4 steps up the field before the tackles even engaged them. Reg got pushed around and can you tell me when there has been any holes?
by huskermic on Oct 17, 2009 9:47 PM CDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Callahan era games
always had the feeling that we were backpedaling and gunshy on the playcalling because we were afraid to make mistakes. That’s what it seems like here. I don’t know if it’s because we seem to have a lot of mediocre talent at WR and can’t commit to any definite set of starters, or because Lee seems to stare down his receivers like they’re the only people on the field.
For now, it seems like Va Tech was the turning point of the season. The D answered the call after the loss, and picked themselves up….the O never recovered. Easy to see which side of the ball Bo focuses more time on….they act more like him.
We beat up on the Sun Belt. We CAN execute. It’s just a matter of mental toughness.
by js17 on Oct 17, 2009 10:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
But offensively
Aren’t we kind of still in the Callahan era? Shouldn’t we expect this to look like the Husker play calling from back then? I mean, it’s the same guy running the offense and calling the plays. Has anything changed, other than that Cotton, Brown and Beck are around?
by Cheeseandcorn on Oct 17, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In some ways...
But I just don’t know. If we can just be honest with ourselves, though – this starts and ends with our O line. They pancake guys at the right time (and only the right time – yes, I’m looking at you henryIf only because I’m on the internet and he can’t find me and crush me like a bug) and it doesn’t matter who’s hitting the hole, it’s going to be a big gain.
How good are our linebackers? Better question is, with a D line like ours, does it really matter? Same thought process for our O. Good lines cover over talent gaps/inexperienced RBs.
Here’s hoping that next week is penalty free, hard-nosed football.
by js17 on Oct 17, 2009 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't blame Watson,completely
Bo Pelini is the head coach. He is the head coach of this Husker team that was thoroughly unprepared to play today. Many of these players are his recruits. We lack talent on offense and the play calling is suspect. We don’t seem to focus on our strengths. We run a 4 receiver set that relies on a good qb and good receivers. Thank goodness the Zac Lee experiment is over, I hope. I will lose a lot of respect for Pelini if he continues to go with Lee. Cody Green is better, obviously. Receivers just aren’t good, yet.
The Big 12 is gonna be tough and the Huskers better find some heart and leadership!
by Champ24 on Oct 17, 2009 11:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Champ24's dead on -- EXPERIMENT OVER!!
Zac maybe a great team/offensive leader and all, but not the the QB that needs to be in the starting line-up right now. I tried pulling for him the best I can, and have trusted Bo’s judgement in Zac, But I can’t take it any more!!!!!!!!!
by huskerfam4 on Oct 18, 2009 1:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Terrible play calls for most of the game. Watson needs to get his head out of his a**, and learn how to run the right plays at the right times. He reminds me of when I play any football game on a video game system. I simply pick a run or pass, and ignore the rest because it’s too complicated. Sometimes I get lucky and gain yards, and others are a disaster. Maybe he consults the magic 8-ball?
Lee is done.
I sat through Football 202 this year, and watched him up on the stage answering questions. The only thing that went through my head, other than “I can’t believe how small he is”, was that he seems to be this good-looking young man from California….that achieved the dream of playing QB at Nebraska. And I hope he knows that he is gonna have to perform, as that smile may get you in a few ladies pants…but won’t get you squat on the field.
I saw it at the Missouri game, when he played like garbage for 3 quarters, and then hit a few lucky passes. After that, he was yappin and smiling and acting like he had planned it all along. Suh was giving him crap about it, and he just grinned. This guy is living in fantasy-land, and Cody Green will wake him up.
The defense played well, allowing 24 points to a team like tech is about right for a team that dominates up front, but has questionable talent in the secondary. It wasn’t raining this time, so how are you going to excuse Amakamura for being owned every play. Another guy who was on the stage during 202, that needs to step up or be replaced. Very average talent.
Can’t say much else, other than we will get beaten by Iowa State at home if we play like that next week. Not to mention the teams with GOOD defenses like OU.
by Mr. Corn on Oct 18, 2009 7:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
...and another thing
Can we play every game on the road? Please?!
by Mr. Corn on Oct 18, 2009 7:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The final blame for the ineptitude of this offense
will land squarely at Watson’s feet. But I think the real problem is what corn blight alluded to towards the end here, and that is the terrible, awful, nauseating, detestable, egregious, infuriating (ect) line play. It is hard to do anything when you can’t seem to block anybody. And we can’t block anyone. Not to mention all of the false start penalties that this unit continues to rack up at the most inoppurtune times, and I think one has to start looking at Barney Cotton. He has been around for awhile now, and frankly, his charges have not been overly impressive. I feel great about the defense. But that O line….yikes. What a terrible game.
Frito: What's the minus of thirty and twenty?
Joe: Uh, it's eighty. It's eighty billion dollars. That's a mighty big minus isn't it?
Frito: Yeah. I like money.
by OmahaCub on Oct 18, 2009 9:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Really the whole offense was horrible
Poor QB play, poor WR play, terrible O-line play. The notion that some had that Watson was the “class” of this coaching staff is absolutely laughable. Watson and Cotton both have some serious work to do to keep their jobs. And to think that some were actually worried about Watson leaving to take a head coaching job somewhere. Yeah, that won’t be happening, unless its a high school gig.
BTW, Lee is still throwing behind his receivers. Which doesn’t matter for our receivers cannot catch.
by meatybob on Oct 18, 2009 9:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well
if we want a running game and the spread we are running isnt working, then why not just line up in the I and run the dam thing. We seem to do much better at opening holes when the full back leads. Just push the thing down their throats, quit trying all the finesse and spread crap and run the ball and use play action passing. Just becuase others are running the spread and having success with it doesnt mean we will or that we HAVE to.
I didnt think much of Watson when he was at CU, didnt understand why we hired him, and was even more confused when we kept him. Its time for someone new.
by taflorom on Oct 20, 2009 8:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
























