Good Game Marred by Bad Broadcast
The Big 12 needs to get on the horn and make sure ESPN never does what it did to the Nebraska-Oklahoma basketball game again. They probably won't, but they should.
The fact that most thought the game would be a blowout might have been the contributing factory, but whatever the reason, ESPNU took a game between two rivals embroiled in a major conference battle, and made it look like a high school A/V club broadcast.
First of all, I understand what ESPN was trying to do. They allowed budding broadcast journalism students to get a sample of what the big leagues was like. They allowed OU students to participate in every aspect of the broadcast, from camera work, to score keeping, to even allowing students to do the sideline and play by play reporting at times.
On it's face it was heartwarming, it was a classy move by a network devoted to college sports, and college students and athletes.
Here's the problem, way back in the day, I studied broadcast journalism. I worked on our campus television station as a crew member for our student news program. We were very good for our class, that being student journalists. We even won some awards. However, NBC never came calling, asking if we wanted to help cover the nightly news. I'm glad they didn't. We weren't ready to play in the big leagues and neither were the kids at OU.
The fact that the kids simply weren't ready was overshadowed by the fact that the way ESPNU covered the kids, took away from the coverage of the game. At several times, the camera actually cut away from action on the floor so we could see a student staring into a screen we could not see, doing virtually nothing. What great drama!
ESPNU apparently found it more important to keep track of the girl manning the camera, than cover the fact that Blake Griffin single handedly carried OU to that victory. When Griffin was struggling on offense (at one time 3-8 from the field) Nebraska was able to build a good lead, and held onto a six point lead at the half.
When Griffin found his rhythm like he did in the second half (finishing with 27 points and 18 rebounds) he is nearly unstoppable, especially by a team with no real big man, or inside presence.
Ryan Anderson tried his best to be Nebraska's Blake Griffin, coming out red hot in the first half, including hitting four of his first six 3-point shots, and tallied 14 points by halftime. Unfortunately for the Huskers, Anderson is no Blake Griffin, and he tailed off badly in the second half, missing his final 3-point attempts and scoring just five points down the stretch.
For most of the night, the game was much closer than the final 11 point margin would indicate, most of that lead was augmented over the final two minutes of the game, when Oklahoma had assured themselves a win, but not a comfortable one, and Nebraska began fouling.
It was a very good game, it was a basketball game worth watching during a night with several that were equally gripping, but ESPNU did themselves, the teams playing, and their fans a disservice by going out of their way to cover the wrong story all together
This FanPost created by a registered user of Corn Nation.
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
They could have done
without the split screen. That would have been okay if I maybe had a 50" screen, but I don’t.
The announcer kid was doing radio play by play for most of it. Ultimately, I think the game was destroyed by the intentional foul call that took any chance we had away.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
by corn blight on Jan 22, 2009 8:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Never good when I have to watch a game on mute
but by the end of the game, I had no sound on, because I was so sick of hearing about the kids.
by BoVandy on Jan 23, 2009 9:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
sweet jesus
that was the worst thing I’ve ever seen in my life
by PopeSoria on Jan 23, 2009 6:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe...
this will be the up and coming strategy for sports networks to CUT COSTS! Jusr send a skeletal pro crew to a game and the the interns do the rest—FOR FREE!
BRILLIANT!
"...don't TAZE me, bro..."
by zE bOp on Jan 24, 2009 7:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
if they
broadcast more games, I’d be okay with it.
Frustrating they don’t show Big 12 teams outside the states without Full Court. I’m already paying too much for this stuff, and it’s time to cut costs, not drive them up.
Given that, maybe you have a point. Although with some of the pro announcers, perhaps you could argue it’s already happened? :)
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
by corn blight on Jan 24, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yup,
well, I don’t follow CBB since the Huskers have never been that good, I can only handle the emotional investment in Husker FB: To watch the hoopsters lose is too much for me.
However, I do like to see what they’re doing from time to time and, yea, maybe they get 1-2 games per season aired, so I don’t see much.
"...don't TAZE me, bro..."
by zE bOp on Jan 24, 2009 11:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I liked the idea, but...
I agree totally. The coverage of covering the game really overshadowed the game. I realize this is “sports entertainment,” but the focus on a game broadcast should be the game. The “behind the scenes” stuff, highlighting the kids either should have been done before the game (maybe set up 15 minutes more between planned games to accomodate) or during halftime.
As for the strategy of cutting costs by using skeletal crews supplemented by local interns, that’s not far off of what NU does for the games on FSN. That’s why Greg Sharpe and Eric Piatkowski are the TV crew for NU games…
Got Corn?
by huskerlibrarian on Jan 24, 2009 11:17 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I was actually
being facetious about the intern idea as a regular thing, but I suppose if they are good, what the heck, why not?
Not for football games though, NEVERRR!
"...don't TAZE me, bro..."
by zE bOp on Jan 24, 2009 11:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 




























